Skip to content

· Private foundation

Laurie Foundation for the Performing Arts Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$63kHuman Services$57kEducation$46kAnimals$39kFood & Nutrition$39kHealth$27kYouth Development$26kCivil Rights$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,611
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Columbia Center for Urban Agriculture$15,611
The Spay Neuter Project$15,611
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Columbia Second Chance: $17k → 11%PASCALE'S PALS: $11k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Laurie Foundation for the Performing Arts Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 81% of the giving stays in MO; by stated purpose, 67%.

Laurie Foundation for the Performing Arts Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 10% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$176k · 13 repeat orgs$142k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +182% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
21

Total granted

$176k
$142k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+182%
+10%

Still filing today

38%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Columbia Center for Urban Agriculture
    2× · 2019–2024 · $28k · revenue +182%
  • DD
    DAY DREAMS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2022 · $26k · revenue +322%
  • VA
    VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER
    4× · 2017–2021 · $6k · revenue +731%

Funded once

  • CS
    COLUMBIA SECOND CHANCE
    one grant, 2023 · $17k · revenue -36%
  • LW
    LIZZYS WALK OF FAITHgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +108%
  • WH
    WELCOME HOME INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $12k · revenue +114%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Capital City Casa

It is the mission of the capital city casa to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children with the 19th judicial circuit of missouri, based on the belief that all children are entitled to a safe and permanent home. the…

Crime & Legal
2
Columbia County Animal Protection Society

To provide temporary, humane care, food, water, shelter and medical attention for stray, homeless, abandoned, neglected and abused animals

Animals
3
Casa of South Central Illinois

The trained volunteers of CASA of South Central Illinois will work with legal and child welfare professionals, educators, and service providers to advocate for the best interests of children that have experienced abuse and/or neglect that…

—
4
Spay Neuter Charlotte

The organization stands for every pet and pet owner by making the highest quality veterinary care and spay neuter services affordable and accessible, with the goal of reducing the number of dogs and cats euthanized in regional shelters and…

Animals
5
Pet Missouri - Columbia Inc

To provide appropriate mobility for all of god's children in need. we seek to provide mobility first for those in greatest need and with the least resources in poor or underdeveloped countries.

Human Services
6
Casa of West Central Illinois

To advocate for abused and neglected children in the legal welfare system.

Crime & Legal
7
Bridge Home No Kill Animal Rescue

To provide a no kill shelter in order to rescue and find homes for displaced animals

Animals
8
Paws of Grays Harbor

PAWS cares for lost, abandoned and abused animals and finds them new homes with responsible owners. PAWS also provides low cost spay and neuter services, a pet food pantry, and community education. During 2024 PAWS adopted out 577 pets.…

Animals
9
Cumberland Valley Animal Shelter Inc

Provide shelter for homeless animals and prevent animal cruelty

Animals
10
Prevent Child Abuse Illinois

To prevent child abuse in Illinois through education, awareness, advocacy, and community support

Crime & Legal
11
Stray Rescue of St Louis

To rescue stray animals in need of medical attention, restore them to health, and place them in homes.

Animals
12
Pets Without Parents Columbus

To be a resource as a no-kill pet rescue service

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Abuse and Neglect Emergency Shelter Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lizzys Walk of Faith. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT EMERGENCY SHELTER INC: $27,938 · OtherCHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT EMERGENCY SHELTER INCThe Spay Neuter Project: $17,081 · OtherThe Spay Neuter ProjectIndividual grant recipient: $15,687 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $15,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWELCOME HOME INC: $11,966 · OtherWELCOME HOME INCMEALS ON WHEELS: $11,507 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELSCENTRAL MO STOP HUMAN TRAFFICKING COALITION: $11,507 · OtherCENTRAL MO STOP HUMAN TRAFFICKING COALITIONIndividual grant recipient: $11,507 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $11,269 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $6,880 · Other+15 more: $55,886 · Other+15 moreCOLUMBIA SECOND CHANCE: $16,775 · Human ServicesCOLUMBIA …PASCALE'S PALS INC: $11,163 · Human ServicesPASCALE'S…Columbia Center for Urban Agriculture: $27,634 · EnvironmentColumbia …DAY DREAMS FOUNDATION: $26,263 · Youth DevelopmentDAY DREAM…LIZZYS WALK OF FAITH: $15,100 · HealthFIRST CHANCE FOR CHILDREN: $11,966 · EducationVOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER: $6,097 · PhilanthropyVOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS: $777 · PhilanthropyNo Kill Columbia Inc: $5,405 · Animals
Other$196,428Human Services$27,938Environment$27,634Youth Development$26,263Health$15,100Education$11,966Philanthropy$6,874Animals$5,405

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT EMERGENCY SHELTER INC: $27,938 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetColumbia Center for Urban Agriculture: $27,634 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetDAY DREAMS FOUNDATION: $26,263 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetCOLUMBIA SECOND CHANCE: $16,775 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetLIZZYS WALK OF FAITH: $15,100 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetWELCOME HOME INC: $11,966 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPASCALE'S PALS INC: $11,163 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetVOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER: $6,097 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNo Kill Columbia Inc: $5,405 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetVOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS: $777 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT EMERGENCY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Columbia Center for Urban Agriculture ↗
  • Who funds DAY DREAMS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA SECOND CHANCE ↗
  • Who funds LIZZYS WALK OF FAITH ↗
  • Who funds WELCOME HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST CHANCE FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds PASCALE'S PALS INC ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds No Kill Columbia Inc ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Veterans United FoundationMO25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Veterans United Foundation · Orscheln Industries Foundation Inc · Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation · Boone County Community Trust · Heart of Missouri United Way Inc · Community Foundation of Central Mo · Boone Electric Community Trust · Mfa Oil Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Laurie Foundation for the Performing Arts Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Laurie Foundation for the Performing Arts Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Laurie Foundation for the Performing Arts Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Laurie Foundation for the Performing Arts Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Laurie Foundation for the Performing Arts’ filings →

    More from the funding graph