Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Laurie and Joseph Klinow Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$39kHealth$28kPhilanthropy$9kArts & Culture$7kEducation$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kAnimals$108Other$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$38k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE$14,375
OXALOSIS AND HYPEROXALURIA FOUNDATI$2,500
JEWISH COMMUNITY FUND$1,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$850
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $108) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLI: $108 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$64k · 8 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +359% since the first grant, against +139% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
14

Total granted

$64k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+359%
+139%

Still filing today

50%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
HealthArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $8k · revenue +12%
  • BF
    Brothers for Life
    2× · 2019–2023 · $3k · revenue +557%
  • TC
    THE CANTOR FITZGERALD RELIEF FUND
    2× · 2018–2019 · $1k · revenue +359%

Funded once

  • JH
    JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY PARENTS COU
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • OA
    OXYLOSIS AND HYPEROLYLAURIA FOUNDAT
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • O
    OHF
    one grant, 2023 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Huntington's Disease Foundation

To fund transformative research to find treatments, and ultimately a cure, for huntington's disease.

Health
2
The Goldstein Family Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Dystonia Medical Research Foundation

The foundation has three main purposes: (1)to advance dystonia research by awarding grants to basic, translational, and clinical investigators and to medical/scientific institutions committed to finding the cause and cure for all forms of…

Health
4
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

5
Northwell Health Foundation

Northwell health foundation inc. is dedicated toward helping donors, patients, and leaders link their vision and philanthropic support toward helping the underserved and uninsured, advancing the latest frontiers in medical technology and…

Health
6
The Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research

The foundation is dedicated to finding a cure for parkinson's disease through an aggressively funded research agenda and ensuring the development of improved therapies for those living with parkinson's today.

Health
7
The Goldenberg Family Foundation
Philanthropy
8
The Charles R Bronfman Prize Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Foundation for Neurologic Diseases Inc

The Foundation is dedicated to finding the cause of and providing treatments for complex, chronic diseases that prematurely destroys Brain Function. Focus is on Alzheimers Multiple Sclerosis and Parkinsons disease.

Health
10
The Steinman Foundation
11
Parkinson's Disease Research Society

Research to find a cure for parkinson's disease.

12
The Milstein Family Foundation
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Roundabout Theatre Company Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE — $38,705 · OtherCENTRAL SYNAGOGUEJOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY PARENTS COU — $5,000 · OtherJOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY PARENTS COUOXYLOSIS AND HYPEROLYLAURIA FOUNDAT — $5,000 · OtherOXYLOSIS AND HYPEROLYLAURIA FOUNDATUJA — $3,000 · OtherOHF — $2,500 · OtherFD FOUNDATION — $2,500 · OtherOHF FOUNDATION — $2,500 · Other+7 more — $6,300 · Other+7 moreCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUN…DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION INC DBA FAMILIAL DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION — $7,500 · HealthDYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATIO…The Oxalosis & Hyperoxaluria Foundation — $2,500 · HealthThe Oxalosis & Hyperox…+2 more — $500 · HealthROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC — $2,500 · Arts & CultureBrothers for Life — $2,500 · Arts & CultureThe Rome Chamber Music Festival Inc — $1,500 · Arts & CultureTHE CANTOR FITZGERALD RELIEF FUND — $1,000 · Public Safety & DisasterISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $108 · Human Services
Other$65,505Health$18,500Arts & Culture$6,500Public Safety & Disaster$1,000Human Services$108

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION INC DBA FAMILIAL DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Oxalosis & Hyperoxaluria Foundation — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBrothers for Life — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rome Chamber Music Festival Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE CANTOR FITZGERALD RELIEF FUND — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $108 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION INC DBA FAMILIAL DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds The Oxalosis & Hyperoxaluria Foundation
  • Who funds ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC
  • Who funds Brothers for Life
  • Who funds The Rome Chamber Music Festival Inc
  • Who funds THE CANTOR FITZGERALD RELIEF FUND
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Laurie and Joseph Klinow Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph