Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lauri S Bauer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$71k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$371kCommunity Improvement$150kPhilanthropy$140kSocial Science$120kHealth$60kYouth Development$60kArts & Culture$50kReligion$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $500
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$426k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAURI BAUER GRIEF CENTER$30,000
JUF$30,000
THE AUDITORIUM THEATRE$10,000
HALLIE225 FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SEASONS HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%SEASONS HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%SEASONS HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%SEASONS HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$920k · 9 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$920k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+143%

Still filing today

67%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyHuman ServicesSocial ScienceYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WILLOW HOUSE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $150k · revenue +22%
  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    4× · 2017–2020 · $140k · revenue +13%
  • CP
    CHICAGO PSYCHOANALYTIC INSTITUTE
    2× · 2021–2022 · $120k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • EF
    ELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +143%
  • TE
    THE ELYSE MARCUS LEGACY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · 32% of their budget
  • HC
    HP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc

The tragedy assistance program for survivors (taps) is america's national nonprofit organization that has cared for the loved ones of our nation's fallen heroes since 1994. taps ensures these living legacies of service and sacrifice do not…

Health
2
Imagine a Center for Coping With Loss

A year round grief support center for children, parents and adults coping with the loss of a family member due to death or life-altering illness, designed to help children and teens develop healthy coping skills and foster resiliency and…

Health
3
Child Loss Foundation

The child loss foundation continues to expand its reach and strives to be a nationally recognized leader in providing comprehensive support to parents grieving the death of a child through retreats, financial assistance and…

Human Services
4
Kara

Kara provides grief support for children, teens, families and adults. Guided by its core values of empathy and compassion, and belief that loss and grief impact everyone, Kara supports people of all ages on their journey through grief so…

5
Brighter Days Family Grief Center

Brighter days grief center is a minnesota nonprofit organization serving adults, young adults, teenagers and children who are grieving the death or terminal diagnosis of a beloved family member. although we are a grief center providing…

Human Services
6
The Family Summit Foundation

A center for grieving children is a support center for children, teens and their families that are grieving the loss of someone they love because of death, divorce or separation. we also help children who are in foster care, children and…

Human Services
7
Caringmatters Inc

Caringmatters provides social supports and community education so that no one dies or grieves alone. our trained and screened volunteers provide compassionate support, without charge, to any montgomery county adult or child facing serious…

Human Services
8
Wildflower Inc

Wildflower is dedicated to serving children and families who have experienced the death of a parent. we provide the gifts of camp, enriching experiences, and consistent, long-term support to help families strengthen their resilience and…

Education
9
Olivia's House - a Grief and Loss Center for Children

Olivia's house is an organization of care-giving professionals and volunteers committed to supporting grieving children. its purpose is to facilitate healing through grief and loss education.

Human Services
10
Because Kids Grieve Inc

Our program in southern Idaho focuses on providing a safe space for children and teenagers aged 6 to 17 who are grieving the loss of a loved one. Through peer support groups and adult volunteer advocates we help these young individuals…

Human Services
11
East End Hospice Inc

East end hospice is dedicated to improving lives across eastern long island through expert care, comfort and compassion for terminally ill patients and their families.

Human Services
12
What About Remembering Me Center Inc

To provide year-round grief support services to children ages three and a half to 18 and their families, as well as young adults ages 19 to 25 who have experienced the death of a mother, father, sister, brother, or other loved one.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Willow House and the most unlike its peers is The Elyse Marcus Legacy Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BARR-HARRIS CHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER — $190,000 · OtherBARR-HARRIS CHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTERJCFS CHICAGO — $105,000 · OtherJCFS CHICAGOTHE AUDITORIUM THEATRE — $90,000 · OtherTHE AUDITORIUM THEATREJUF — $30,000 · OtherJUF+3 more — $19,482 · OtherWILLOW HOUSE — $150,000 · Community ImprovementWILLOW HOUSEJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $140,409 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FU…CHICAGO PSYCHOANALYTIC INSTITUTE — $120,000 · Social ScienceCHICAGO PSYCH…LAURI BAUER GRIEF CENTERS — $65,000 · HealthLAURI BAU…ELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATION — $20,000 · HealthELUNA FOR…SEASONS HOSPICE FOUNDATION — $40,000 · Human ServicesEXPERIENCE CAMPS — $20,000 · Youth Development
Other$434,482Community Improvement$150,000Philanthropy$140,409Social Science$120,000Health$85,000Human Services$40,000Youth Development$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWILLOW HOUSE — $150,000 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $140,409 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO PSYCHOANALYTIC INSTITUTE — $120,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetLAURI BAUER GRIEF CENTERS — $65,000 over 2y, 71% of budgetSEASONS HOSPICE FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetEXPERIENCE CAMPS — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE ELYSE MARCUS LEGACY FOUNDATION INC — $11,482 over 1y, 32% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WILLOW HOUSE
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
  • Who funds CHICAGO PSYCHOANALYTIC INSTITUTE
  • Who funds LAURI BAUER GRIEF CENTERS
  • Who funds SEASONS HOSPICE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds EXPERIENCE CAMPS
  • Who funds ELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE ELYSE MARCUS LEGACY FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lauri S Bauer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph