· Private foundation
Laurenti Family Charitable Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $57k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $57k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Sarasota Memorial Health Care | $27,000 |
| St Labre Indian School | $10,000 |
| Rider University | $10,000 |
| Mote Marine Laboratory | $10,000 |
| Guide Dog Foundation | $6,000 |
| Palo Alto Medical Foundation | $6,000 |
| Sutter Health | $5,000 |
| Bonefish & Tarpon Trust | $5,000 |
| Mercer County Police & Fire Foundation | $5,000 |
| Save Our Sea Birds | $5,000 |
| Sarasota Performing Arts Center | $5,000 |
| Range of Motion Project | $5,000 |
| The Family Giving Tree | $5,000 |
| American Heart Association | $3,000 |
| Doctors Without Borders | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
33 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GDGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC5× · 2020–2024 · $33k · revenue +20%
- RORange Of Motion Project6× · 2017–2024 · $27k · revenue +106%
MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC5× · 2020–2024 · $25k · revenue +129%
Funded once
- ARALASKA RAPTOR REHABILITATION CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +42%
- TMTHE MIDNIGHT PASS SOCIETY II INCone grant, 2021 · $5k
- MCMercer County Police And Firemenone grant, 2021 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…
The organization's mission is to increase local services and resources for the homeless. miph provides affordable permanent housing in central new jersey, giving families a stable place to live while they prepare for their lives free from…
Mercy home provides essential services for children and adults with developmental disabilities. mercy home's mission is to ensure the quality of life for persons with developmental disabilities through the recognition of each person's…
A medical school dedicated to excellence in the tripartite academic medical missions of education, scientific research, and clinical care.
The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…
The mission of the children's home society of new jersey is to save children's lives and build healthy families. chs provides at-risk children and their families with a range of culturally sensitive social services that strengthen, support…
The organizations are committed to providing the full spectrum of life-enhancing care and services to create and sustain healthy, vibrant communities. please refer to schedule h, part vi, question 5 for the organization's community benefit…
The Mission of Riverbank Charter School of Excellence is to provide students with opportunities to develop their intellectual, emotional, and social potential through the implementation of a dynamic curriculum that fosters learning through…
Mentis provides bilingual professional mental health services to people throughout the county of every age, stage, and income level.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
To provide enhanced opportunities for all citizens of bergen and passaic counties with intellectual and other disabilities and their families through advocacy, community education, direct services, and customized supports to help these…
Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Serv Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mercer County Police and Firemans Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds Range Of Motion Project ↗
- Who funds BONEFISH & TARPON TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC ↗
- Who funds SARASOTA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAVE OUR SEABIRDS INC ↗
- Who funds Rescue Mission of Trenton New Jersey ↗
- Who funds SUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR EDUCATIONAL ADVANCEMENT ↗
- Who funds RIDER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY GIVING TREE ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds Platinum Minds Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS CENTRAL NEW JERSEY ↗
- Who funds SERV FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALASKA RAPTOR REHABILITATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE MIDNIGHT PASS SOCIETY II INC ↗
- Who funds HOMEFRONT INC ↗
- Who funds MOMS HELPING MOMS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOPEWELL VALLEY ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Investors Foundation Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · Citizens Philanthropic Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · FirstBank Charitable Foundation Inc · Columbia Bank Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · The Provident Bank Foundation · Oceanfirst Foundation · The James Kerney Foundation · William Penn Bank Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Laurenti Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Womanspace Inc — 47% of income from government
- Anchor House Inc — 45% of income from government
- Prevention Education Inc — 39% of income from government
- Horizons Inc — 39% of income from government
- Homefront Inc — 9% of income from government
- Rescue Mission of Trenton New Jersey — 8% of income from government
- Mote Marine Laboratory Inc — 4% of income from government
- Grounds for Sculpture Inc — 1% of income from government
- Rider University — 1% of income from government
- Sierra House Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.