Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Laurans a & Arlene H Mendelson Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$4.0MHealth$1.4MPhilanthropy$1.3MEducation$1.2MCivil Rights$150kReligion$125kInternational$95kHuman Services$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $750k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.2M
$6,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$180k
Total assets

Anchored by a single position — about 100% of reported assets are held in Heico Corp Common New.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORY ART$1,209,452
UM MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$200,000
BAPTIST HEALTH SO FLA$200,000
UNITED WAY OF MIAMI DADE$100,000
FLORIDA GRAND OPERA$100,000
GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION$100,000
SOUTH FLORIDA PBS$50,000
KRAFT CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE$25,000
AMER FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$10,000
INSTITURE FOR JEWISH STUDIES$10,000
DANIELS MUSIC FOUNDATION$10,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$10,000
FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE$10,000
AMER FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CTN$10,000
AMER COMMITTEE FOR WEIZMANN INSTIT$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%SELF HELP COMMUNITY SERVICE: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CA
NE
WV
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of Laurans a & Arlene H Mendelson Charitable Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 82% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 79% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Laurans a & Arlene H Mendelson Charitable Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.7M · 34 repeat orgs$264k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

34 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
20

Total granted

$5.7M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+13%

Still filing today

44%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $233k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthInternationalHuman ServicesPublic BenefitEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $220k · revenue +46%
  • RE
    RANSOM EVERGLADES SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $200k · revenue +61%
  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
    6× · 2019–2025 · $150k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • SC
    SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +26%
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR ISRAEL AND JEWISH STU
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • BB
    BISCAYNE BAY WATERKEEPER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
7
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

8
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
9
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
10
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
11
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
12
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyUnited Way FederationsClassical Music EnsemblesGovernment Accountability R…Jewish Community FederationsLand Conservation Organizat…Cancer Support OrganizationsEducation Equity LeadershipHomeless Services & ShelterChild and Family ServicesAnimal Rescue and AdoptionChristian Missionary Organi…Community Arts OrganizationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr15%36%20–35yr9%16%35–55yr12%42%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr15%20%20–35yr9%28%35–55yr12%52%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
17%
17,089/103,012

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
21/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORY ART — $3,142,599 · OtherINSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORY ARTMT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $801,605 · OtherMT SINAI MEDICAL CENTERBAPTIST HEALTH SO FLA — $305,000 · OtherBAPTIST HEALTH SO FLAUM MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $200,000 · Other+48 more — $215,981 · OtherUNITED WAY MIAMI INC — $659,360 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY MIAMI …GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $631,660 · PhilanthropyGREATER MIAMI JEW…+1 more — $6,220 · PhilanthropyTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $1,012,072 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF …RANSOM EVERGLADES SCHOOL INC — $200,000 · EducationRANSOM EVERGLADE…FLORIDA GRAND OPERA INC — $510,671 · Arts & CultureFLORIDA GRA…SOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC — $220,214 · Arts & CultureSOUTH FLORI…DANIEL'S MUSIC FOUNDATION — $70,136 · Arts & CultureDANIEL'S MU…+4 more — $4,140 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $150,026 · Civil RightsBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $74,958 · International+1 more — $25 · InternationalHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $29,998 · Religion
Other$4,665,185Philanthropy$1,297,240Education$1,212,072Arts & Culture$805,161Civil Rights$150,026International$74,983Religion$29,998

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $1,012,072 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY MIAMI INC — $659,360 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $631,660 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFLORIDA GRAND OPERA INC — $510,671 over 9y, 24% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC — $220,214 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetRANSOM EVERGLADES SCHOOL INC — $200,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $150,026 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $74,958 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDANIEL'S MUSIC FOUNDATION — $70,136 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $29,998 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $10,012 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC — $6,220 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBISCAYNE BAY WATERKEEPER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $2,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $1,430 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $530 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMiami Rescue Mission Inc — $501 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC — $406 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute — $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art — $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BLEXIT FOUNDATION INC — $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds UNITED WAY MIAMI INC
  • Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC
  • Who funds FLORIDA GRAND OPERA INC
  • Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC
  • Who funds RANSOM EVERGLADES SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DANIEL'S MUSIC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE
  • Who funds SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BISCAYNE BAY WATERKEEPER INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Florman Family Foundation IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Florman Family Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Laurans a & Arlene H Mendelson Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 19%
  • United Way Miami Inc23% of income from government
  • Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc19% of income from government
  • South Florida Pbs Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Laurans a & Arlene H Mendelson Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Laurans a & Arlene H Mendelson Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph