Skip to content

· Private foundation

Laster Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$101kHealth$19kEducation$17kHuman Services$7kFood & Nutrition$6kHousing & Shelter$6kInternational$6kAnimals$500
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$47k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
First United Methodist$10,000
The Salvation Army$2,000
Harvesters Comm Food Network$2,000
Flourish$2,000
Washburn University Foundation$1,000
Habitat for Humanity$1,000
The Smile Train$1,000
St Jude Childrens Hospital$1,000
Heifer International$1,000
Humane Society of Kansas City$500
American Cancer Society$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%The Smile Train: $1k → 17%Heifer International: $1k → 17%Washburn University Foundation: $2k → 14%Emporia State Univ Foundation: $10k → 16%The Salvation Army: $2k → 15%St Jude Childrens Hospital: $1k → 17%The Smile Train: $1k → 17%Heifer International: $1k → 17%Washburn University Foundation: $1k → 14%The Salvation Army: $1k → 15%St Jude Childrens Hospital: $1k → 17%The Smile Train: $1k → 17%Heifer International: $1k → 17%Washburn University Foundation: $1k → 14%First United Methodist: $10k → 15%The Salvation Army: $1k → 15%St Jude Childrens Hospital: $1k → 17%The Smile Train: $1k → 17%Heifer International: $1k → 17%Washburn University Foundation: $1k → 14%The Salvation Army: $1k → 15%St Jude Childrens Hospital: $1k → 17%The Smile Train: $1k → 17%Heifer International: $1k → 17%Washburn University Foundation: $1k → 14%The Salvation Army: $1k → 15%St Jude Childrens Hospital: $1k → 17%The Smile Train: $1k → 17%Washburn University Foundation: $1k → 14%The Salvation Army: $1k → 15%Aldersgate United Methodist Church: $18k → 15%Aldersgate United Methodist Church: $18k → 15%Aldersgate United Methodist Church: $18k → 15%Aldersgate United Methodist Church: $18k → 15%Aldersgate United Methodist Church: $18k → 15%Harvesters Comm Food Network: $2k → 15%Harvesters Community Food Network: $1k → 15%Harvesters Community Food Network: $1k → 15%Harvesters Community Food Network: $1k → 15%Flourish: $2k → 15%Habitat for Humanity: $1k → 15%Habitat for Humanity: $1k → 15%Habitat for Humanity: $1k → 15%Childrens Mercy: $1k → 15%Habitat for Humanity: $1k → 15%Childrens Mercy: $1k → 15%Habitat for Humanity: $1k → 15%Childrens Mercy: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$137k · 11 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$137k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+164%

Still filing today

45%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WU
    WASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +208%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +24%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • PC
    Partridge Community Church
    one grant, 2022 · $500
  • HH
    Hospice Homecare of Reno County
    one grant, 2021 · $500
  • SC
    SUMMIT CHRISTIAN ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50 · revenue +164%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Cook Children's Medical Center - Prosper

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
3
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
4
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Augusta Health Care Inc

The mission of augusta health is to strengthen the health and well-being of all people in our communities.

Health
6
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
7
Emanate Health

Our mission is to help people keep well in body, mind, and spirit by providing quality health care services in a safe, compassionate environment.

Health
8
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
10
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
11
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emporia State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Flourish. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALDERSGATE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $90,000 · OtherALDERSGATE UNITED METHODIST CHURCHFirst United Methodist: $10,000 · OtherFirst United MethodistSALVATION ARMY: $7,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INC: $6,000 · OtherHeifer International: $5,500 · OtherHabitat for Humanity: $5,500 · Other+5 more: $8,000 · Other+5 moreEMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationEMPORIA STAT…WASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $7,000 · EducationWASHBURN UNI…+1 more: $50 · EducationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,050 · HealthHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $3,000 · Food & NutritionFlourish: $2,000 · Youth Development
Other$132,000Education$17,050Health$6,550Food & Nutrition$3,000Youth Development$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFlourish: $2,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMIT CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Flourish ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SUMMIT CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Laster Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Laster Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Laster Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph