Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Laster Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Religion$101kHealth$19kEducation$17kHuman Services$7kFood & Nutrition$6kHousing & Shelter$6kInternational$6kAnimals$500
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$47k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
First United Methodist$10,000
The Salvation Army$2,000
Harvesters Comm Food Network$2,000
Flourish$2,000
Habitat for Humanity$1,000
The Smile Train$1,000
Heifer International$1,000
St Jude Childrens Hospital$1,000
Washburn University Foundation$1,000
Humane Society of Kansas City$500
American Cancer Society$50
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%The Smile Train: $1k → 17%Heifer International: $1k → 17%Washburn University Foundation: $2k → 14%Emporia State Univ Foundation: $10k → 16%The Salvation Army: $2k → 15%St Jude Childrens Hospital: $1k → 17%The Smile Train: $1k → 17%Heifer International: $1k → 17%Washburn University Foundation: $1k → 14%The Salvation Army: $1k → 15%St Jude Childrens Hospital: $1k → 17%The Smile Train: $1k → 17%Heifer International: $1k → 17%Washburn University Foundation: $1k → 14%First United Methodist: $10k → 15%The Salvation Army: $1k → 15%St Jude Childrens Hospital: $1k → 17%The Smile Train: $1k → 17%Heifer International: $1k → 17%Washburn University Foundation: $1k → 14%The Salvation Army: $1k → 15%St Jude Childrens Hospital: $1k → 17%The Smile Train: $1k → 17%Heifer International: $1k → 17%Washburn University Foundation: $1k → 14%The Salvation Army: $1k → 15%St Jude Childrens Hospital: $1k → 17%The Smile Train: $1k → 17%Washburn University Foundation: $1k → 14%The Salvation Army: $1k → 15%Aldersgate United Methodist Church: $18k → 15%Aldersgate United Methodist Church: $18k → 15%Aldersgate United Methodist Church: $18k → 15%Aldersgate United Methodist Church: $18k → 15%Aldersgate United Methodist Church: $18k → 15%Harvesters Comm Food Network: $2k → 15%Harvesters Community Food Network: $1k → 15%Harvesters Community Food Network: $1k → 15%Harvesters Community Food Network: $1k → 15%Flourish: $2k → 15%Habitat for Humanity: $1k → 15%Habitat for Humanity: $1k → 15%Habitat for Humanity: $1k → 15%Childrens Mercy: $1k → 15%Habitat for Humanity: $1k → 15%Childrens Mercy: $1k → 15%Habitat for Humanity: $1k → 15%Childrens Mercy: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$137k · 11 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$137k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+164%

Still filing today

45%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WU
    WASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +208%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +24%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • PC
    Partridge Community Church
    one grant, 2022 · $500
  • HH
    Hospice Homecare of Reno County
    one grant, 2021 · $500
  • SC
    SUMMIT CHRISTIAN ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50 · revenue +164%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Cook Children's Medical Center - Prosper

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
3
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
4
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Augusta Health Care Inc

The mission of augusta health is to strengthen the health and well-being of all people in our communities.

Health
6
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
7
Emanate Health

Our mission is to help people keep well in body, mind, and spirit by providing quality health care services in a safe, compassionate environment.

Health
8
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
10
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

11
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emporia State University Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Flourish. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALDERSGATE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $90,000 · OtherALDERSGATE UNITED METHODIST CHURCHFirst United Methodist — $10,000 · OtherFirst United MethodistSALVATION ARMY — $7,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INC — $6,000 · OtherHeifer International — $5,500 · OtherHabitat for Humanity — $5,500 · Other+5 more — $8,000 · Other+5 moreEMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationEMPORIA STAT…WASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $7,000 · EducationWASHBURN UNI…+1 more — $50 · EducationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $5,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $1,050 · HealthHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK — $3,000 · Food & NutritionFlourish — $2,000 · Youth Development
Other$132,000Education$17,050Health$6,550Food & Nutrition$3,000Youth Development$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $5,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFlourish — $2,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $1,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMIT CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WASHBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK
  • Who funds Flourish
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds SUMMIT CHRISTIAN ACADEMY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Laster Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph