Skip to content

· Private foundation

Larson Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$329k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0168% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$957kInternational$670kHousing & Shelter$595kHealth$380kHuman Services$251kFood & Nutrition$95kArts & Culture$70kPhilanthropy$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $134k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $180k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ON THE RISE$70,000
FULL FRAME INITIATIVE (CCF)$60,000
EDVESTORS$50,000
Individual grant recipient$34,000
LEA$25,000
MGH FUND$15,000
DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$15,000
LOON ECHO LAND TRUST$15,000
GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$10,000
FULL PLATES FULL POTENTIAL$10,000
USC ASSOCIATES$10,000
NEIGHBORHOOD TRUST FINANCIAL PARTNERS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
JULIE'S FAMILY LEARNING PROGRAM$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $600k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ON THE RISE: $75k → 8%ON THE RISE: $75k → 8%ON THE RISE: $75k → 8%ON THE RISE: $75k → 8%ON THE RISE: $75k → 8%ON THE RISE: $75k → 8%ON THE RISE: $75k → 8%ON THE RISE: $70k → 8%JULIE'S FAMILY LEARNING PROGRAM: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 18 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
3

Total granted

$3.7M
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+91%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OT
    ON THE RISE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $595k · revenue +138%
  • VP
    VICTORY PROGRAMS INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $370k · revenue +185%
  • TF
    THE FAMILY CENTER INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $200k · revenue +148%

Funded once

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +91%
  • BR
    BOSTON RESILIENCY FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New England Community Project Inc

Necp believes that social change happens when those most impacted by issues of systemic injustice, organize at the block level to address issues within their neighborhoods. through their involvement at a community level, residents engage…

Community Improvement
2
Neighborhealth Corporation

Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…

Health
3
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
4
Boston Foundation Inc

As Greater Boston's community foundation, the Boston Foundation devotes its resources to expanding opportunities, improving lives and strengthening communities. See Schedule OThe Foundation fulfills this mission in three principal ways:…

Philanthropy
5
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
6
United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc

To advance an economically just region where prosperity is shared across race and ethnicity.

Philanthropy
7
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
8
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
9
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
10
Philabundance

PHILABUNDANCE WAS FOUNDED IN 1984 WITH THE SIMPLE BELIEF THAT NO ONE SHOULD GO HUNGRY WHILE HEALTHY FOOD GOES TO WASTE. OUR MISSION IS TO DRIVE HUNGER FROM OUR COMMUNITIES TODAY AND TO END HUNGER FOR GOOD. We have a commitment to always…

Food & Nutrition
11
Family Promise North Shore Boston Inc

Family promise north shore boston's mission is to prevent and end family homelessness. we promote access to economic opportunity and housing stability through a holistic, family-centered, community-based response.

Human Services
12
Brookline Community Mental Health Center Inc Dba the Brookline Center

The brookline center for community mental health provides groundbreaking mental health services rooted in meaningful innovation and compassionate care. in response to today's mental health landscape and the ongoing mental health crisis,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Boston Food Bank Inc; the most unlike its peers is Desert Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE FULL FRAME INITIATIVE INC: $670,000 · OtherTHE FULL FRAME INITIATIVE INCMACALESTER COLLEGE ANNUAL FUND: $521,700 · OtherMACALESTER COLLEGE ANNUAL FUNDLEA: $220,000 · OtherLEAUSC: $150,000 · OtherUSCIndividual grant recipient: $128,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMGH: $105,000 · Other+9 more: $251,000 · Other+9 moreON THE RISE INC: $595,000 · Human ServicesON THE RISE INC+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesVICTORY PROGRAMS INC: $370,000 · HealthVICTORY PROGRAMS …THE FAMILY CENTER INC: $200,000 · HealthTHE FAMILY CENTER…+1 more: $10,000 · HealthEDVESTORS INC: $435,000 · EducationEDVESTORS IN…NEIGHBORHOOD TRUST FINANCIAL PARTNERS INC: $70,000 · Arts & CultureFULL PLATES FULL POTENTIAL: $45,000 · Food & NutritionDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $35,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,045,700Human Services$600,000Health$580,000Education$435,000Arts & Culture$70,000Food & Nutrition$45,000Philanthropy$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FULL FRAME INITIATIVE INC: $670,000 over 8y, 11% of budgetON THE RISE INC: $595,000 over 8y, 6.6% of budgetEDVESTORS INC: $435,000 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetVICTORY PROGRAMS INC: $370,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetTHE FAMILY CENTER INC: $200,000 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD TRUST FINANCIAL PARTNERS INC: $70,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFULL PLATES FULL POTENTIAL: $45,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLoon Echo Land Trust Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJulies Family Learning Program Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FULL FRAME INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds ON THE RISE INC ↗
  • Who funds EDVESTORS INC ↗
  • Who funds VICTORY PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD TRUST FINANCIAL PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds FULL PLATES FULL POTENTIAL ↗
  • Who funds DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Loon Echo Land Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Julies Family Learning Program Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall Charity Fund · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Larson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Larson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Victory Programs Inc: 49% of income from government
  • On the Rise Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • The Family Center Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Edvestors Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Larson Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph