· Private foundation
Larry J and Dinah M Bird Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $58k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $155k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| John McNichols Memorial Track | $25,000 |
| Community School of Naples | $20,000 |
| Toby Keith Foundation | $10,000 |
| Indiana State University Foundation Inc | $10,000 |
| Wabash Valley Family Sports Center | $10,000 |
| Springs Valley Education Foundation | $10,000 |
| Reggie Lewis Track and Field Athletic Center | $10,000 |
| Golisano Children's Museum of Naples | $10,000 |
| Hamilton Center Foundation | $10,000 |
| NAMI Collier County | $10,000 |
| Sheltering Wings | $10,000 |
| Gibson Family Center for Hospice | $10,000 |
| Dana-Farber Cancer Institute | $10,000 |
| Indiana State University Foundation Inc | $5,000 |
| Carmel United Methodist Church | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $143k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WVWabash Valley Family Sports Center Inc4× · 2022–2025 · $50k · revenue +40%
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC2× · 2020–2022 · $45k · revenue +34%
COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC2× · 2024–2025 · $25k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- AAAlzheimer's Association for Researchone grant, 2023 · $25k
- CHComfort Home Place Incone grant, 2024 · $20k · 38% of their budget
- DBDavid Benner Memorial Fund CO Pacers Foundationone grant, 2024 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Humane Society for Hamilton County (HSHC) is saving lives, educating communities and completing families by providing a compassionate and healthy environment for the homeless animals of Hamilton County, Indiana, until they can be placed…
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.
To mobilize people, ideas, and investments to make this a community where all individuals have equitable opportunity to reach their full potential - no matter place, race or identity.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
The institute for protein innovation is advancing protein science to accelerate research and improve human health.
Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NAISMITH MEMORIAL BASKETBALL HALL OF FAME ↗
- Who funds Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds HAMILTON CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Wabash Valley Family Sports Center Inc ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds HAMBLEN TOWNSHIP VOLUNTARY FIRE DEP ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC ↗
- Who funds Simon Youth Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE TOBY KEITH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Comfort Home Place Inc ↗
- Who funds THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds Brown County Humane Society Inc ↗
- Who funds Indiana State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI Collier County Inc ↗
- Who funds SPRINGS VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GOLISANO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NAPLES INC ↗
- Who funds MIDDLE WAY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds WARRIORS HOMES OF COLLIER INC ↗
- Who funds BROWN COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC ↗
- Who funds Peggy Adams Animal Rescue League of the Palm Beaches Inc ↗
- Who funds Terre Haute Boys & Girls Club ↗
- Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds HORIZON HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COLLIER COUNTY FLOR ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Collier Community Foundation Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · The George F and Marion D Johnson Charitable Trust · Lacy Foundation · The League Club Inc · Samerian Foundation Inc · Eugene & Marilyn Glick Foundation · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Larry J and Dinah M Bird Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc — 2% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.