Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lang Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$567k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$1.9MAnimals$451kPublic Safety & Disaster$98kRecreation & Sports$53kEducation$43kArts & Culture$33kHuman Services$30kYouth Development$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $250k+2 grants · $500k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION$250,000
CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION$250,000
SAEGERTOWN HERITAGE SOCIETY$25,000
SAEGERTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$25,000
ERIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
SAEGERTOWN HIGH SCHOOL$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PLACE OF HOPE: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 8 repeat orgs$154k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
11

Total granted

$2.5M
$129k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+30%

Still filing today

75%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureFood & NutritionHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $450k · revenue +39%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PBC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $20k · revenue +109%
  • FC
    FRENCH CREEK VALLEY CONSERVANCY
    3× · 2019–2022 · $13k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • NC
    NORTON CANCER INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • CI
    CARP INC
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • AO
    Adopt-A-Family of the Palm Beaches Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +47%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pennsylvania Beef Council

The pennsylvania beef council (pbc) is a non-profit organization working on behalf of 25,000 beef, dairy, and veal producers in pennsylvania. the council seeks to promote the beef industry in pennsylvania and educate consumers through a…

—
2
Humane Pennsylvania

Humane pennsylvania empowers the people in our communities to increase their capacity to care for animals so that all animals are healthy, safe, and treated humanely.

Animals
3
Humane Pennsylvania Foundation

To encourage and motivate the making of gifts and donations by deed, will, or otherwise, for the advancement, promotion, extension, and maintenance of the various causes and objectives fostered by the humane pennsylvania.

Animals
4
The Piedmont Environmental Council

Protect and restore the lands and waters of the virginia piedmont, while building stronger, more sustainable communities.

Environment
5
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
6
Community Foundation of Fayette County Pa

To build a stronger fayette county by inspiring charitable giving, supporting nonprofits, and nurturing positive community impact.

Philanthropy
7
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
8
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
9
Peoria County Farm Bureau

To be an advocate of agriculture through leadership and education.

Food & Nutrition
10
Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (PSPCA) protects animals from cruelty and abuse, rescues and rehabilitates neglected, abandoned and unwanted animals, and promotes animal welfare throughout Pennsylvania.…

Animals
11
Professional Fire Fighters of Wisconsin Charitable Foundation Inc

The mission of the professional fire fighters of wisconsin charitable foundation is to champion community risk reduction initiatives; promote fire safety and prevention; and deliver meaningful support to burn survivors, fire fighters and…

Human Services
12
Peninsula Community Health Services

Pchs exemplifies a culture of community service.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Erie Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Saegertown Heritage Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $1,850,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION+11 more: $214,000 · Other+11 moreWILD SHEEP FOUNDATION: $450,000 · AnimalsWILD SHEEP FOUNDAT…+1 more: $1,000 · AnimalsTHE SAEGERTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $97,500 · Public Safety & DisasterSAEGERTOWN HERITAGE SOCIETY: $25,000 · Arts & CultureRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureERIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PBC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentFOUNDATION FOR FREE ENTERPRISE EDUCATION: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRENCH CREEK VALLEY CONSERVANCY: $13,000 · Environment
Other$2,064,000Animals$451,000Public Safety & Disaster$97,500Arts & Culture$30,000Philanthropy$25,000Youth Development$25,000Environment$13,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWILD SHEEP FOUNDATION: $450,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetTHE SAEGERTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $97,500 over 7y, 17% of budgetGOLF FORE AFRICA INC: $53,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetAdopt-A-Family of the Palm Beaches Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetERIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PBC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRENCH CREEK VALLEY CONSERVANCY: $13,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPLACE OF HOPE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR FREE ENTERPRISE EDUCATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPalm Beach County Food Bank Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEADVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCRAWFORD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Crawford Heritage Community FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Crawford Heritage Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lang Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lang Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Adopt-a-Family of the Palm Beaches Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Place of Hope Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lang Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lang Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lang Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph