Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lane Walker Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$36kReligion$17kPublic Benefit$9kAnimals$6kInternational$4kEducation$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$581k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
First Presbyterian Church$4,000
Salvation Army$3,000
Hillsdale College$2,000
Food Bank of Alaska$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
PAWS for Purple Hearts$1,500
Hope Center$1,500
Outdoorsforall$1,000
PAWS$1,000
Boy Scouts of America$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Salvation Army: $3k → 16%Judicial Watch: $3k → 14%Hillsdale College: $2k → 14%AWON: $100 → 16%Outdoorsforall: $1k → 9%The Assistance League: $1k → 9%CWU Foundation: $500 → 11%Alaska SPCA: $1k → 10%Wreaths Across America: $200 → 16%Judicial Watch: $3k → 14%Hillsdale College: $1k → 14%USO Northwest: $200 → 9%Salvation Army: $7k → 9%Food Bank of Alaska: $2k → 10%Wreaths Across America: $100 → 16%Judicial Watch: $2k → 14%University of Washington Foundation: $200 → 9%First Presbyterian Church: $6k → 9%Salvation Army: $1k → 10%Judicial Watch: $1k → 14%UW Foundation: $100 → 9%Salvation Army: $5k → 9%Friends of the National WWII Memori: $500 → 14%University of Washington Foundation: $50 → 9%Salvation Army: $4k → 9%University Presbyterian Church: $4k → 9%Salvation Army: $4k → 9%University Presbyterian Church: $2k → 9%First Presbyterian Church: $4k → 9%University Presbyterian Church: $1k → 9%Salvation Army: $3k → 9%University Presbyterian Church: $300 → 9%Two Hearts Pregnancy Center: $1k → 9%Brier Helping Brier: $1k → 9%Boy Scouts of America: $250 → 9%Mountlake Terrace: $2k → 9%Concern for Neighbors FB: $1k → 9%SnoIsle Library Foundation: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
WA
MI
IN
DC
OK
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of Lane Walker Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Lane Walker Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$62k · 9 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
15

Total granted

$62k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+17%

Still filing today

33%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’24’25
Public BenefitEducationAnimalsHealthFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $9k · revenue +16%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $350 · revenue +7%
  • WA
    Wreaths Across America
    2× · 2020–2022 · $300 · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • CF
    Concern for Neighbors FB
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • TA
    The Assistance League
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alaska Whale Foundation

Alaska Whale Foundation is dedicated to marine mammal conservation through research monitoring and education.

Environment
2
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
3
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
4
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
5
Blood Bank of Alaska Inc

The blood bank provides blood products and testing services to hospitals to ensure an adequate and safe supply of blood in routine and emergency situations. it provides educational services to potential donors and recipients of blood…

Health
6
American Civil Liberties Union of Alaska

Preservation and promotion of civil rights and civil liberties.

—
7
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
8
Washington Society of Certified Public a

We are a community of cpas and financial professionals cultivating authentic relationships, unique learning experiences, and purposeful advocacy for our future.

—
9
America's Newspapers

Providing research, education and practical information all aimed at optimizing newspapers' business operations, deepening their community engagement and enhancing the quality of their journalism.

Employment
10
Alaska Nurses Association

To improve health standards,foster high standards for nurses and to promote the profession of nursing

—
11
Amazon Conservation Association

Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…

Environment
12
Alaska Farmers Market Association

to promote, support and advocate for Alaska agriculture

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Providence General Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Alaska Mountain Rescue Group. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Salvation Army: $25,000 · OtherSalvation ArmyFirst Presbyterian Church: $10,000 · OtherFirst Presbyterian ChurchUNIVERSITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $6,800 · OtherUNIVERSITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHHope Center: $6,000 · OtherHope CenterPAWS: $3,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $3,000 · Other+16 more: $11,850 · Other+16 moreJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $9,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WAT…+1 more: $300 · Public BenefitWORLD VISION INC: $4,000 · InternationalHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $3,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $350 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationFood Bank of Alaska: $1,500 · Food & NutritionALASKA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,000 · AnimalsOutdoors for all Foundation: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$66,150Public Benefit$9,300International$4,000Education$3,450Food & Nutrition$1,500Animals$1,000Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFood Bank of Alaska: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALASKA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOutdoors for all Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MEMORIAL INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWreaths Across America: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE GENERAL FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSNO-ISLE LIBRARIES FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Food Bank of Alaska ↗
  • Who funds ALASKA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds ALASKA MOUNTAIN RESCUE GROUP ↗
  • Who funds Outdoors for all Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MEMORIAL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Wreaths Across America ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE GENERAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SNO-ISLE LIBRARIES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Holdings FoundationMO11.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lane Walker Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lane Walker Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lane Walker Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lane Walker Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lane Walker’s filings →

    More from the funding graph