· Public charity
Landmarks Preservation Council of Illinois
To accelerate preserving and reusing significant places statewide to foster healthy, livable and thriving communities.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| A HOUSE IN AUSTIN | $6,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Holt co history
Promote history of the city of LeRoy
Exhibits and programs of the history of Orland Park, IL.
The mission of the Society is the collection preservation and dissemination of knowledge about the history of St Louis Park
Historical museum
Preservation of historic buildings and artifacts
Restore and Preserve Historic House
Manage, Maintain and Operate Historic Public Building
Society formed for the preservation of history of Elizabeth Township.
Preserve HIstorical Depot
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds A HOUSE IN AUSTIN ↗
- Who funds ELMHURST ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds SHELBYVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE OLD MILLSTADT WATER TOWER ↗
- Who funds MOLINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds SCHUYLER COUNTY ARCHITECTURE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR WOMENS HISTORY AND LEADERSHIP ↗
- Who funds HYDE PARK HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Landmarks Preservation Council of Illinois funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Landmarks Preservation Council of Illinois. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Landmarks Preservation Council of Illinois’ filings →