Skip to content

· Private foundation

Landgraf Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$443k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$102k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Youth Development$378kReligion$245kRecreation & Sports$153kAnimals$144kCommunity Improvement$115kHealth$99kEducation$91kInternational$56kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $208k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $204k
$10,551
Median grant
5
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMPERSHIPS$102,175
CAMPERSHIPS$50,911
GIRL SCOUTS$50,633
CHICAGO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$25,751
Individual grant recipient$25,645
NIU FOUNDATION$25,486
NEIC$20,641
CHICAGO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$20,324
FIELD MUSEUM$15,816
ST JOSEPH CHURCH$12,008
CLEARBROOK$10,582
ARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGO$10,551
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$10,495
CENTRAL METHODIST$10,235
UIUC$10,233
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CLEARBROOK: $11k → 14%CLEARBROOK: $11k → 14%CLEARBROOK: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 20 repeat orgs$392k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
12

Total granted

$1.1M
$161k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+23%

Still filing today

40%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $231k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Chicago Zoological Society
    5× · 2020–2024 · $119k · revenue +80%
  • NI
    NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $115k · revenue +484%
  • FM
    FEED MY HUNGRY CHILDREN
    4× · 2021–2024 · $56k · revenue +323%

Funded once

  • LU
    LOYLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO - FBO THE PARKINSON SCHOOL OF HEALTH SCIENCES
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • RC
    RED CROSS
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $23k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pediatric Faculty Foundation Inc

We value excellence and innovation in clinical and basic research, coordinated and comprehensive patient care, ongoing physician education, and evidence-based child advocacy. our goal is to provide leadership in endeavors that promote the…

Health
2
Children's Hospital of Chicago Medical Center

We are dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for the northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a leader in: -pediatric health care delivery…

Health
3
University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education
4
Stanley Manne Childrens Research Institute

Stanley manne children's research institute strives to generate new knowledge and advance the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric diseases.

Health
5
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
6
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
7
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
8
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
9
Lurie Children's Surgical Foundation Inc

Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.

—
10
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
11
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
12
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kids in Danger. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GIRL SCOUTS: $277,663 · OtherGIRL SCOUTSCAMPERSHIPS INC: $153,086 · OtherCAMPERSHIPS INCST JOSEPH CHURCH: $104,941 · OtherST JOSEPH CHURCHNORTHEAST ILLINOIS COUNCIL BSA: $99,030 · OtherNORTHEAST ILLINOIS COUNCIL BSAFEED MY HUNGRY CHILDREN: $55,791 · OtherST MARY OF THE LAKE SEMINARY: $51,239 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGO: $47,032 · OtherUIUC: $40,782 · Other+19 more: $300,648 · Other+19 moreChicago Zoological Society: $118,581 · AnimalsChicago Zoo…HINSDALE HUMANE SOCIETY: $15,339 · AnimalsHINSDALE HU…ORPHANS OF THE STORM: $10,087 · AnimalsORPHANS OF …NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $115,168 · EducationNORTHERN …Marquette University: $5,322 · EducationCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC: $5,155 · EducationCLEARBROOK: $31,224 · Human ServicesAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $10,365 · HealthCystic Fibrosis Research Fund Inc: $9,669 · HealthFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $15,816 · Arts & CultureNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $10,275 · Food & NutritionREADING POWER INC: $5,209 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,130,212Animals$144,007Education$125,645Human Services$31,224Health$20,034Arts & Culture$15,816Food & Nutrition$10,275Youth Development$6,209

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChicago Zoological Society: $118,581 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $115,168 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFEED MY HUNGRY CHILDREN: $55,791 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetCLEARBROOK: $31,224 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $15,816 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHINSDALE HUMANE SOCIETY: $15,339 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $10,495 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $10,365 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $10,275 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetORPHANS OF THE STORM: $10,087 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCystic Fibrosis Research Fund Inc: $9,669 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMarquette University: $5,322 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREADING POWER INC: $5,209 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC: $5,155 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKids In Danger: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Chicago Zoological Society ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY HUNGRY CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds CLEARBROOK ↗
  • Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds HINSDALE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ORPHANS OF THE STORM ↗
  • Who funds Cystic Fibrosis Research Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds READING POWER INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Kids In Danger ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Landgraf Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Landgraf Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Landgraf Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph