Skip to content
Land Family Foundation Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Land Family Foundation Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$131k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$509kCivil Rights$495kEnvironment$439kPublic Benefit$218kPhilanthropy$86kArts & Culture$63kAnimals$61kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $129k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATURE FORWARD$33,000
FLORA OF VIRGINIA PROJECT$30,000
EARTH FORCE INC$25,000
TOGETHER VIRGINIA$21,000
POTOMAC CONSERVANCY$20,000
SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE & FOOD SYSTEMS FUNDERS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TALMAR GARDENS & HORTICULTURAL THERAPY CENTER: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Land Family Foundation Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Land Family Foundation Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 17 repeat orgs$242k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
21

Total granted

$1.7M
$242k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+46%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentCivil RightsHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OXFAM-AMERICA INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $509k · revenue +8%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OHIO FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $412k · revenue +73%
  • NF
    Nature Forward
    8× · 2017–2024 · $165k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • TP
    THE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCILgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue +85%
  • CI
    CIVIC INFLUENCERS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -16%
  • WR
    Wildlife Rescue League
    one grant, 2023 · $27k · revenue -59%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Wildlife & Recreation Coalition

Creating a greener, healthier, more equitable, and better Washington for all through community outreach, network building, and advocacy for conservation and outdoor recreation funding.

—
2
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
3
Nature for Justice

To empower frontline communities to lead nature-based solutions that advance climate justice, ecosystem restoration, and resilient livelihoods through connecting locally-led initiatives to funding, markets, and technical support.

Environment
4
Center for Environmental Law & Policy

The Center for Environmental Law & Policy is a statewide organization whose mission is to protect, preserve and restore Washington's waters through education, advocacy, policy reform, and public interest litigation.

Environment
5
Northern Virginia Conservation Trust

The Northern Virginia Conservation Trust saves nearby nature by encouraging and assisting governments and private landowners to preserve and care for natural areas, trails, streams, parks, and historic and cultural resources for the…

Environment
6
Earthcorps

To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.

International
7
Wild Virginia Incorporated

Protecting and connecting virginia's wild places.

Environment
8
Partnership for Policy Integrity

Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.

Environment
9
California Environmental Voters

To increase public awareness of elected officials' performances on environmental issues, to influence decisions of public officials on environmental legislation and policy, and to engage in related social welfare activities to promote and…

Civil Rights
10
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
11
Greenwater Foundation

Greenwater Foundation provides leadership of marine conservation and humanitarian efforts undertaken by diverse organizations (governments, universities, NGOs, and private companies) by providing coordination of affordable vessels and…

Science & Tech
12
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Potomac Conservancy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Talmar Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
21/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OXFAM-AMERICA INC: $508,973 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INCAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OHIO FOUNDATION INC: $412,188 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES U…CIVIC INFLUENCERS INC: $50,000 · Civil RightsCIVIC INFLUENCERS INCIndividual grant recipient: $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTOGETHER VIRGINIA: $78,000 · OtherTOGETHER VIRGINIAWCBE-FM 905: $59,688 · OtherWCBE-FM 905FLORA OF VIRGINIA PROJECT: $33,000 · OtherFLORA OF VIRGINIA PROJECTLeague of Women Voters of the Fairfax Area: $20,000 · OtherONEVIRGINIA2021 FOUNDATION: $34,050 · OtherONEVIRGINIA2021 FOUNDATION+12 more: $67,343 · Other+12 moreNature Forward: $165,000 · EnvironmentNature ForwardTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $60,000 · EnvironmentTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRO…THE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC: $39,000 · EnvironmentTHE POTOMAC CONSERV…Northern Virginia Bird Alliance Inc: $17,870 · EnvironmentNATUREBRIDGE: $17,063 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT: $15,000 · Environment+7 more: $34,902 · Environment+7 morePLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC: $66,000 · PhilanthropyVOLUNTEER CENTER OF FAIRFAX COUNTY INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $30,000 · AnimalsWildlife Rescue League: $26,500 · AnimalsEarth Force Inc: $49,000 · Human ServicesTALMAR INC: $2,400 · Human Services
International$508,973Civil Rights$462,188Other$492,081Environment$348,835Philanthropy$81,000Animals$56,500Human Services$51,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $508,973 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OHIO FOUNDATION INC: $412,188 over 6y, 13% of budgetNature Forward: $165,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC: $66,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $60,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCIVIC INFLUENCERS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetEarth Force Inc: $49,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetTHE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC: $39,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetONEVIRGINIA2021 FOUNDATION: $34,050 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Rescue League: $26,500 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetNorthern Virginia Bird Alliance Inc: $17,870 over 1y, 13% of budgetNATUREBRIDGE: $17,063 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVOLUNTEER CENTER OF FAIRFAX COUNTY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBAY JOURNAL MEDIA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SYSTEMS FUNDERS: $7,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $5,130 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNorthern Virginia Community College Educational Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITIZENS FOR PENNSYLVANIA'S FUTURE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF KENILWORTH AQUATIC GARDENS: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPotomac Riverkeeper Network: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCity Wildlife Inc: $4,100 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHESAPEAKE LEGAL ALLIANCE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPRINCE WILLIAM CONSERVATION ALLIANCE: $2,400 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Keith Campbell Fo…The Community Foundat…Frederick Henry Princ…The Oak Hill FundKentfields FoundationGreater Washington Co…White House Farm Foun…Agua FundincFoundation for Pennsy…The Morris and Gwendo…Max & Victoria Dreyfu…Patagoniaorg
The Keith Campbell Foundation for the Environment IncMD23.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Keith Campbell Foundation for the Environment Inc · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · Frederick Henry Prince Testamentary Trust · The Oak Hill Fund · Kentfields Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · White House Farm Foundation · Agua Fundinc · Foundation for Pennsylvania Watersheds · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Max & Victoria Dreyfus Foundation Inc · Patagoniaorg

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Land Family Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Land Family Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 32%
  • Talmar Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Nature Forward: 32% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Land Family Foundation Trust?

Find your warmest path to Land Family Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Land Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home