Skip to content
Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$919k
Granted FY2022
1,278
Grants FY2022
49
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

59% of Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to American Online Giving Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 855 organizations, $919k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

1049
’20
829
’21
855
’22
6
’23
5
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$1.9MPhilanthropy$1.6MEducation$435kHealth$317kCivil Rights$284kAnimals$93kPublic Safety & Disaster$76kHuman Services$73kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1278 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1265 grants · $300k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $184k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $436k
$50
Median grant
49
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE IDAHO FOODBANK$110,000
SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST$100,000
OREGON FOOD BANK$100,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCORPORATED$64,054
SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA$61,500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$41,847
NORTH COUNTRY FOOD BANK$25,000
NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK$25,000
FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA$25,000
TABER FOOD BANK SOCIETY$21,294
IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE$21,250
SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST$14,450
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF IDAHO$10,000
OREGON FOOD BANK INC$9,575
SHARE OUR STRENGTH INC$6,900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC: $550 → 12%CHARITY FOR CHILDREN INC: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2k → 14%DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF WISCONSIN INC: $450 → 17%SWEET POTATOS CLOSET: $3k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC: $300 → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2k → 14%DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF WISCONSIN INC: $300 → 17%PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER INC: $1k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $650 → 14%FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA: $25k → 24%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $600 → 14%FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA: $20k → 24%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $350 → 14%FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA: $12k → 24%EASTERN OREGON MISSION: $6k → 12%EASTERN OREGON MISSION: $3k → 12%LA POSADA INC: $600 → 11%LA POSADA INC: $500 → 11%LA POSADA INC: $450 → 11%HOPE MEDICAL OF WASHINGTON: $650 → 11%TRI-CITY UNION GOSPEL MISSION: $1k → 11%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF BENTON & FRANKLIN COUNTIES: $550 → 11%WOMENS AND CHILDRENS ALLIANCE INC: $4k → 8%TRI-CITY UNION GOSPEL MISSION: $1k → 11%WOMENS AND CHILDRENS ALLIANCE INC: $2k → 8%WOMENS AND CHILDRENS ALLIANCE INC: $2k → 8%WOMENS AND CHILDRENS ALLIANCE INC: $1k → 8%EASTERN OREGON MISSION: $550 → 12%TRI-CITY UNION GOSPEL MISSION: $725 → 11%TRI-CITIES CHAPLAINCY: $1k → 11%BENTON-FRANKLIN COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE INC: $700 → 11%YMCA OF THE GREATER TRI-CITIES: $505 → 11%THE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO: $1k → 8%SWEET POTATOS CLOSET: $500 → 12%THE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO: $1k → 8%TRI-CITY UNION GOSPEL MISSION: $500 → 11%TRI-CITY UNION GOSPEL MISSION: $350 → 11%PLUMBERS AND STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 598 BIKES FOR TIKES CHARITY: $300 → 11%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF BENTON & FRANKLIN COUNTIES: $400 → 11%FAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER AND EDUCATION SERVICES - INC: $450 → 8%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF BENTON & FRANKLIN COUNTIES: $350 → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $838 → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $600 → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $500 → 14%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $550 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 34% of Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Lamb Weston Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 859 repeat orgs$157k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

859 repeat relationships: 587 still active in FY2022, 272 since wound down; 373 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

859
749

Total granted

$3.4M
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+28%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthAnimalsHuman ServicesEducationInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $538k · revenue +4%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST
    5× · 2020–2024 · $507k · revenue +14%
  • OREGON FOOD BANK
    5× · 2020–2024 · $444k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MARKS SCHOOL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +160%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF NE MINNESOTAgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +30%
  • UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +141%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
2
Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland

The Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland nurtures the connection between people and pets to advance animal welfare and improve the quality of life in our community.

Animals
3
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
4
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
5
Disability Rights Washington

Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.

Human Services
6
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
7
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
8
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
9
Shelter Animal Resource Alliance

Shelter Animal Resource Alliance rescues, assists, and advocates for shelter animals in Lane County by developing and implementing programs designed to increase the number of animals adopted into permanent, loving homes and decrease the…

Animals
10
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
11
United Animal Nations Dba Redrover

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and…

—
12
Shelter From the Storm Animal Rescue Inc

Reduce the euthanasia rate of healthy and adoptable animals and improve the lives of companion animals by finding permanent homes for animals in need, providing support to communities who do not have access to humane organizations,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Idaho; the most unlike its peers is Imagine a Cure Cancer Treatment. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

1472 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1472 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
363
Early backer (in before they grew)
1414/1472
Grantees still filing
1060/1472
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $1,517,529 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION IN…+4 more: $37,750 · PhilanthropyOREGON FOOD BANK: $443,605 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANKScholarship America Inc: $316,201 · OtherScholarship America IncNORTH COUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $109,300 · OtherNORTH COUNTRY FOOD BANK INCCanadian Online Giving Foundation: $62,510 · Other+123 more: $493,857 · Other+123 moreIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $537,783 · Food & NutritionIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSESECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST: $507,384 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTH…NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $105,350 · Food & NutritionNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK+5 more: $10,587 · Food & NutritionNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC: $250,100 · Civil Rights+2 more: $2,500 · Civil RightsST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $120,741 · HealthRonald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Inc: $21,250 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $15,140 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $14,839 · Health+22 more: $39,685 · HealthFOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA INC: $68,730 · Human ServicesEASTERN OREGON MISSION: $10,015 · Human ServicesWomen's and Children's Alliance: $8,691 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,246 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $4,925 · Human Services+16 more: $25,451 · Human ServicesWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $64,700 · InternationalUnited States Association for UNHCR: $3,771 · InternationalCompassion International Incorporated: $3,359 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $3,238 · InternationalMercy Corps: $3,103 · International+5 more: $6,578 · International
Philanthropy$1,555,279Other$1,425,473Food & Nutrition$1,161,104Civil Rights$252,600Health$211,655Human Services$123,058International$84,749

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $1,517,529 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $537,783 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST: $507,384 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $443,605 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC: $250,100 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $120,741 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH COUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $109,300 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $105,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA INC: $68,730 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $64,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $36,153 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $25,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThurgood Marshall College Fund: $25,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Inc: $21,250 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $15,140 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $14,839 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWENATCHEE VALLEY UNITED SOCCER CLUB: $11,000 over 3y, 50% of budgetSeattle Children's Foundation: $10,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEASTERN OREGON MISSION: $10,015 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetFUZZ BALL ANIMAL RESCUE: $8,915 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetWomen's and Children's Alliance: $8,691 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTRI-CITIES CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $6,312 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPEOPLE FOR PETS MAGIC VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,800 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE COLUMBIA BASIN: $5,450 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBENTON FRANKLIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,246 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIMMIGRANT LAW CENTER OF MINNESOTA INC: $5,150 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLAKES AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5,150 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH FRANKLIN EAGLE'S NEST: $5,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF DISABLED VETERANS: $5,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetGRANT COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $5,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $4,925 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Idaho Foundation Inc: $4,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMIKEYS CHANCE MORENO: $4,636 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $4,165 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRI CITY UNION GOSPEL MISSION: $3,821 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $3,771 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BENTON AND FRANKLIN COUNTIES: $3,450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWashington State University Alumni Association: $3,405 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $3,238 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $3,103 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIdaho Humane Society Inc: $2,970 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA CO ID: $2,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-CITIES PREP A CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $2,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,748 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,608 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

3 Rivers Community Fo…Idaho Power Foundatio…United Way of Benton …Laura Moore Cunningha…St Luke's Health Syst…Claude R & Ethel B Wh…Blue Cross of Idaho F…Simplot Company Found…The Julius C Jeker Fo…Idaho Community Found…Idaho Womens Charitab…Jeker Family Trust
3 Rivers Community FoundationWA69.9× affinity39 shared granteesties to 3 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: 3 Rivers Community Foundation · Idaho Power Foundation Inc · United Way of Benton & Franklin Counties · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Claude R & Ethel B Whittenberger Foundation · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · The Julius C Jeker Foundation Inc · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Idaho Womens Charitable Foundation · Jeker Family Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 180%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute: 44% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Prudence Crandall Center Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
18get no government money at all
50report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lamb Weston’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home