Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lalwani Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$25kReligion$18kFood & Nutrition$14kPhilanthropy$13kCommunity Improvement$12kHealth$7kHousing & Shelter$5kArts & Culture$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$472k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LACASA$5,000
GLEANERS OAKLAND DISTRIBUTION CENTER$2,500
ARYA SAMAJ GREATER HOUSTON$2,500
LIVINGSTON COUNTY UNITED WAY$2,500
FOOD GATHERERS$2,500
DETROIT INDIAN WOMEN ASSOCIATION$1,500
MAI FAMILY SERVICES$1,000
LIVINGSTON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,000
FORGOTTEN HARVEST$1,000
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD ART CENTER$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$1,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$800
CHINMAYA MISSION ANN ARBOR$500
BRIGHTON DISTRICT LIBRARY$500
THE HINDU TEMPLE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 42% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%ARYA SAMAJ GREATER HOUSTON: $3k → 16%LIVINGSTON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2k → 5%FORGOTTEN HARVEST: $1k → 8%CHINMAYA MISSION ANN ARBOR: $500 → 14%KASI SRI VISHWANATHA TEMPLE: $500 → 16%DETROIT INDIAN WOMEN ASSOCIATION: $2k → 21%LIVINGSTON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1k → 5%FORGOTTEN HARVEST: $1k → 8%CHINMAYA MISSION ANN ARBOR: $500 → 14%KASI SRI VISHWANATHA TEMPLE: $500 → 16%DETROIT INDIAN WOMEN ASSOCIATION: $2k → 21%LIVINGSTON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1k → 5%FORGOTTEN HARVEST: $500 → 8%DETROIT INDIAN WOMEN ASSOCIATION: $2k → 21%LIVINGSTON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1k → 5%DETROIT INDIAN WOMEN ASSOCIATION: $1k → 21%LIVINGSTON COUNTY UNITED WAY: $3k → 5%BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD ART CENTER: $1k → 8%LIVINGSTON COUNTY UNITED WAY: $3k → 5%BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD ART CENTER: $1k → 8%FOOD GATHERERS: $3k → 14%MAI FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 21%LIVINGSTON COUNTY UNITED WAY: $3k → 5%BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD ART CENTER: $1k → 8%FOOD GATHERERS: $3k → 14%MAI FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 21%LIVINGSTON COUNTY UNITED WAY: $3k → 5%BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD ART CENTER: $1k → 8%FOOD GATHERERS: $3k → 14%AMI FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 21%LIVINGSTON COUNTY UNITED WAY: $2k → 5%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $800 → 8%FOOD GATHERERS: $3k → 14%MAI FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 21%FOOD GATHERERS: $1k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $1k → 14%ARYA PRATINIDHL SABHA AMERICA: $3k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $1k → 14%LACASA: $5k → 5%ARYA PRATINIDHL SABHA AMERICA: $3k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $1k → 14%LACASA: $5k → 5%ARYA PRATINIDHL SABHA AMERICA: $3k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $1k → 14%LACASA: $3k → 5%ARYA PRATINIDHL SABHA AMERICA: $1k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $1k → 14%LACASA: $3k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$96k · 17 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
4

Total granted

$96k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+36%

Still filing today

59%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FG
    FOOD GATHERERS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $11k · revenue +28%
  • AP
    ARYA PRATINIDHI SABHA AMERICA
    4× · 2020–2023 · $9k · revenue +96%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    5× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +139%

Funded once

  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2022 · $500
  • BD
    BIRGHTON DISTRICT LIBRARY
    one grant, 2022 · $500
  • PK
    PASCHIMA KASI SRI VISWANATHA TEMPLE
    one grant, 2020 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Laborers International Union of State of Mi

Collective bargaining and representation

—
2
Food Bank of Eastern Michigan

The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…

Food & Nutrition
3
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

—
4
Michigan Advocacy Program

To advance the safety, independence, and economic stability of those most affected by poverty, racism, and other structurally oppressive systems by increasing access to justice and working for systemic solutions.

Crime & Legal
5
Oakland County Bar Association

The mission of the Oakland County Bar Association is to serve the professional needs of our members, improve the justice system, and ensure the delivery of quality legal services to the public.

—
6
Area Agency On Aging of Western Michigan Inc

Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…

Human Services
7
Home Builders Association of Michigan

A voice of the building industry in Michigan. The primary purpose is to positively influence the legislative, regulatory and legal issues that affect the industry.

—
8
Lakeshore Legal Aid

Standing with our neighbors, Lakeshore Legal Aid fights poverty and injustice through advocacy and by providing meaningful and dignified access to the legal system.

Crime & Legal
9
Alumni Association of the University of Michigan

The Association is an independent worldwide organization that nurtures lifelong relationships with and among current and future Michigan alumni. As a committed partner of the University the Association offers programs of relevance and…

Education
10
Legal Aid of Western Michigan

We protect rights, challenge injustice, and fight poverty through freelegal advocacy for people and families.

Crime & Legal
11
Detroit Food Policy Council

The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…

Food & Nutrition
12
Washtenaw Care-Based Safety

Care-Based Safetys mission is to provide a nonpolice response program that will grow life-affirming support and opportunities for all community members in Washtenaw County. We deliver a community cocreated program with two mutually…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food Gatherers; the most unlike its peers is Arya Pratinidhi Sabha America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LACASA: $15,500 · OtherLACASAFOOD GATHERERS: $11,000 · OtherFOOD GATHERERSGLEANERS OAKLAND DISTRIBUTION CENTER: $11,000 · OtherGLEANERS OAKLAND DISTRIBUTION CENTERDETROIT INDIAN WOMEN ASSOCIATION: $6,000 · OtherDETROIT INDIAN WOMEN ASSOCIATIONUniversity of Michigan: $5,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganLIVINGSTON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $4,500 · OtherLIVINGSTON HABITAT FOR HUMANITYARYA SAMAJ GREATER HOUSTON: $2,500 · OtherCHINMAYA MISSION ANN ARBOR: $2,500 · OtherHINDU TEMPLE: $2,500 · Other+5 more: $4,000 · Other+5 moreLIVINGSTON COUNTY UNITED WAY: $12,500 · PhilanthropyLIVINGSTON COU…ARYA PRATINIDHI SABHA AMERICA: $8,500 · ReligionARYA PRAT…Birmingham Bloomfield Art Ctr Inc: $4,000 · Arts & CultureMAI FAMILY SERVICES SASHITAL: $4,000 · Arts & CultureFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $3,000 · Food & NutritionSewa International Inc: $2,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,800 · HealthCOTS: $500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$64,500Philanthropy$12,500Religion$8,500Arts & Culture$8,000Food & Nutrition$3,000Human Services$2,000Health$1,800Housing & Shelter$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLACASA: $15,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLIVINGSTON COUNTY UNITED WAY: $12,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD GATHERERS: $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetARYA PRATINIDHI SABHA AMERICA: $8,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $5,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBirmingham Bloomfield Art Ctr Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMAI FAMILY SERVICES SASHITAL: $4,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSewa International Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOTS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LACASA ↗
  • Who funds LIVINGSTON COUNTY UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds FOOD GATHERERS ↗
  • Who funds ARYA PRATINIDHI SABHA AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds Birmingham Bloomfield Art Ctr Inc ↗
  • Who funds MAI FAMILY SERVICES SASHITAL ↗
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds Sewa International Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds COTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lalwani Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lalwani Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lalwani’s filings →

    More from the funding graph