Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lakshmi & C Krishnamoorthy Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$238k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Environment$63kEducation$50kHealth$45kYouth Development$45kReligion$41kInternational$3kArts & Culture$3kHousing & Shelter$987Other$0
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $188k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$45,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARYS ACADEMY$50,000
NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS$45,000
GIRLS INC OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST$45,000
HINDU EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA$40,000
PARKINSON RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC$40,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY$17,584
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $697) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BAPS CHARITIES INC: $387 → 11%BAPS CHARITIES INC: $200 → 8%BAPS CHARITIES INC: $110 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
OR
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

23%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$53k · 18 repeat orgs$180k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
3

Total granted

$53k
$360

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+64%

Still filing today

83%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $180k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthReligionArts & CulturePhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PR
    Parkinson Research Foundation Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $41k · revenue +24%
  • II
    ILID INC
    3× · 2018–2022 · $2k · revenue +15%
  • FLORIDA STUDIO THEATRE INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • TN
    TAMIL NADU FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $200 · revenue +64%
  • PN
    PEDIATRIC NEUROTRANSMITTER DISEASE ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $110 · revenue -78%
  • MS
    MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC - DOCTORS WITHOUT
    one grant, 2020 · $50

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Ayurvedic Medical Association

The National Ayurvedic Medical Association represents the Ayurvedic profession in the United States of America. Our mission is to preserve, protect, promote and advance the consciousness-based philosophy, knowledge, science and practice of…

Community Improvement
2
Nalanda 20

Improve excellence and access in higher education. Current focus is on India. Thus, Nalanda 2.0's current focus is to make India's higher education system world-class by building a world-class multidisciplinary research university,…

Education
3
Varasiddhi
Arts & Culture
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
Sampradaya Usa

Foster teachings of hindu religion

Religion
6
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
7
Ravi and Naina Patel Foundation
Philanthropy
8
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
9
Sindhi Association of North America
10
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
11
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
12
Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

The society is a multidisciplinary professional medical organization dedicated to improving human health by advancing nuclear medicine, molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baps Charities Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ilid Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr19%29%20–35yr12%19%35–55yr16%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr19%53%20–35yr12%1%35–55yr16%28%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
11%
2,771/25,408

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST MARYS ACADEMY — $50,000 · OtherST MARYS ACADEMYTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $17,584 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY+12 more — $6,440 · Other+12 moreGirls Inc of the Pacific Northwest — $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentGirls Inc of the Pac…NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC — $45,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL NETWORK OF …Parkinson Research Foundation Inc — $41,134 · HealthParkinson Research …+3 more — $1,794 · HealthHINDU EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA CORP — $40,000 · ReligionHINDU EDUCATIONAL …+1 more — $547 · ReligionILID INC — $1,997 · PhilanthropyTAMIL NADU FOUNDATION INC — $200 · PhilanthropyFLORIDA STUDIO THEATRE INC — $1,095 · Arts & CultureWHYY INC — $497 · Arts & Culture
Other$74,024Youth Development$45,000Environment$45,000Health$42,928Religion$40,547Philanthropy$2,197Arts & Culture$1,592

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGirls Inc of the Pacific Northwest — $45,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC — $45,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetParkinson Research Foundation Inc — $41,134 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetHINDU EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA CORP — $40,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $17,584 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetILID INC — $1,997 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetFLORIDA STUDIO THEATRE INC — $1,095 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALACHUA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $987 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $897 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSATHYA SAI SOCIETY OF AMERICA — $887 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBAPS CHARITIES INC — $697 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARSHA BODHA CENTER A NEW JERSEY NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $547 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCARNATIC MUSIC ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA — $497 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWHYY INC — $497 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $497 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKeystone Paralyzed Veterans of America Inc — $497 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTKG ACADEMY INC — $497 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $497 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTAMIL NADU FOUNDATION INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way WorldwideVA11.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Worldwide · Verizon Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lakshmi & C Krishnamoorthy Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Girls Inc of the Pacific Northwest4% of income from government
  • Florida Studio Theatre Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph