Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lakeridge Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
17
States reached
$276k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$11MReligion$2.1MInternational$2.1MHealth$1.8MYouth Development$267kPhilanthropy$210kHousing & Shelter$155kArts & Culture$104kOther$0
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $67k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $370k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+1 grant · $276k
$10,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$942k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$276,100
EQUIP HEALTH$227,000
WORLD HOPE INTERNATIONAL$200,000
OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL$150,000
JERICHO ROAD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$100,000
GENEROUS GIVINGS$85,000
SOWER MINISTRY$82,500
YOUNG LIFE$58,407
BUILD PROMISE (ST LUKES BLDG)$50,000
NEW HORIZONS FOUNDATION$50,000
BUFFALO AKG ART MUSEUM$50,000
WORLD RELIEF$45,000
THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION$40,000
THE VERITAS FORUM$40,000
NICHOLS SCHOOL$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $572k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOSPICE BUFFALO: $3k → 13%THE 38CHALLENGE PROJECT: $15k → 13%COACHING LOVE: $2k → 17%MOPS INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 12%THE 38CHALLENGE PROJECT: $5k → 13%MOPS INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 12%THE 38 CHALLENGE PROJECT: $5k → 13%MOPS INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 12%MOPS INTERNATIONAL: $8k → 12%BUILD PROMISE INC: $100k → 13%BUFFALO CITY MISSION: $170k → 13%BUFFALO CITY MISSION: $165k → 13%BUFFALO CITY MISSION: $20k → 13%BUFFALO CITY MISSION: $20k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 66% of Lakeridge Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 20% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 16% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Lakeridge Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.3M · 38 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +6% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

38 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
26

Total granted

$7.3M
$758k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+4%

Still filing today

61%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $382k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’22’23’24’25
InternationalReligionEducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JERICHO ROAD MINISTRIES INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +157%
  • NS
    NICHOLS SCHOOL OF BUFFALO
    6× · 2019–2025 · $865k · revenue +32%
  • GG
    GENEROUS GIVING INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $290k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $200k
  • BUILD PROMISE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • CU
    CANISIUS UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christel House International Inc

Chi prepares graduates of the christel house schools operated by its affiliated entities, which chi funds and oversees, to achieve upward economic mobility, demonstrate good citizenship, and become empowered to identify and realize their…

International
2
Good Shepherd Hospice Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

3
Chs Physician Partners Pc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
4
Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christs healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
5
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
6
Chs Services Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

7
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

8
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
10
Catholic Health System of Long Island

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities

11
Good Shepherd Hospice

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

12
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity International Inc D/B/a Opportunity International-Us and the most unlike its peers is Youth Mentoring Action Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Community Health CentersCommunity Arts OrganizationsCancer Support OrganizationsLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Community FoundationsChristian Youth CampsEducation Equity LeadershipPublic University Foundatio…Substance Abuse TreatmentHospice Care ServicesAt-Risk Youth MentoringHomeless Services & ShelterFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Independent K-8 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%7%<5yr13%7%5–10yr18%13%10–20yr15%22%20–35yr14%22%35–55yr22%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%1%<5yr13%1%5–10yr18%0%10–20yr15%15%20–35yr14%69%35–55yr22%15%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/51
the rest of the field
12%
8,891/72,308

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/48
Grantees still filing
28/48
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Wheaton College — $10,350,000 · EducationWheaton CollegeNICHOLS SCHOOL OF BUFFALO — $865,480 · EducationNICHOLS SCHOOL OF BUFFALO+5 more — $96,250 · EducationWESLEYAN CHURCH CORPORATION — $950,000 · OtherWESLEYAN CHURCH CORP…EQUIP HEALTH — $477,000 · OtherEQUIP HEALTHSOWER MINISTRY — $277,500 · OtherSOWER MINISTRYIndividual grant recipient — $276,100 · OtherIndividual grant rec…WORLD RELIEF — $230,000 · OtherWORLD RELIEFIndividual grant recipient — $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant rec…THE FIELD SCHOOL INC — $120,000 · OtherYOUNG LIFE — $169,907 · Other+37 more — $768,931 · Other+37 moreWorld Hope International Inc — $900,000 · InternationalWorld Hope…OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US — $525,000 · InternationalOPPORTUNIT…CURE INTERNATIONAL INC — $175,000 · InternationalCURE INTER…+5 more — $105,000 · International+5 moreJERICHO ROAD MINISTRIES INC — $1,007,500 · ReligionGENEROUS GIVING INC — $290,000 · ReligionTHE VERITAS FORUM INC — $105,000 · ReligionCHRISTIAN UNION INC — $55,000 · Religion+2 more — $52,500 · ReligionCITY MISSION SOCIETY INC — $375,000 · Human ServicesBUILD PROMISE INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesMOMCO GLOBAL INC — $68,000 · Human ServicesTHE 38 CHALLENGE PROJECT INC — $25,000 · Human Services+2 more — $4,000 · Human ServicesThe New Horizons Foundation Inc — $200,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BISON CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $30,000 · PhilanthropyROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION — $25,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION — $122,500 · HealthCHRISTIAN COUNSELING MINISTRIES WESTERNNEWYORK INC — $50,000 · HealthHOWARD HANNA CHILDREN'S FREE CARE FUND — $30,000 · HealthECMC FOUNDATION INC — $21,500 · Health+1 more — $1,500 · Health
Education$11,311,730Other$3,469,438International$1,705,000Religion$1,510,000Human Services$572,000Philanthropy$255,000Health$225,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWheaton College — $10,350,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetJERICHO ROAD MINISTRIES INC — $1,007,500 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetWorld Hope International Inc — $900,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetNICHOLS SCHOOL OF BUFFALO — $865,480 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US — $525,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCITY MISSION SOCIETY INC — $375,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetGENEROUS GIVING INC — $290,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc — $200,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCURE INTERNATIONAL INC — $175,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $169,907 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION — $122,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FIELD SCHOOL INC — $120,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE VERITAS FORUM INC — $105,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBUILD PROMISE INC — $100,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetBUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY — $83,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCABRINI GREEN LEGAL AID — $75,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCANISIUS UNIVERSITY — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOMCO GLOBAL INC — $68,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCHRISTIAN UNION INC — $55,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHEART'S CRY CHILDREN'S MINISTRY — $50,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN COUNSELING MINISTRIES WESTERNNEWYORK INC — $50,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetTHE SOWERS MINISTRY — $40,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetOASIS INTERNATIONAL LTD NFP — $40,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS — $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BISON CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHOWARD HANNA CHILDREN'S FREE CARE FUND — $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE 38 CHALLENGE PROJECT INC — $25,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetECMC FOUNDATION INC — $21,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCROSS TRAINING FOOTBALL INC — $20,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetVillage of Hamburg Community Foundation — $15,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC — $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERHOPE INC — $12,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTrinity International University — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH HAVEN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUFFALO PREP INC — $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity at Buffalo Foundation Inc — $6,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDUNATIONS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEIGHT DAYS OF HOPE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HILARY GRACE FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetARTPARK & COMPANY INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH MENTORING ACTION NETWORK — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOACHING LOVE INC — $1,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Wheaton College
  • Who funds JERICHO ROAD MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds World Hope International Inc
  • Who funds NICHOLS SCHOOL OF BUFFALO
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US
  • Who funds CITY MISSION SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds GENEROUS GIVING INC
  • Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc
  • Who funds CURE INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE FIELD SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds THE VERITAS FORUM INC
  • Who funds BUILD PROMISE INC
  • Who funds BUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY
  • Who funds CABRINI GREEN LEGAL AID
  • Who funds CANISIUS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MOMCO GLOBAL INC
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN UNION INC
  • Who funds HEART'S CRY CHILDREN'S MINISTRY
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN COUNSELING MINISTRIES WESTERNNEWYORK INC
  • Who funds THE SOWERS MINISTRY
  • Who funds OASIS INTERNATIONAL LTD NFP
  • Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS
  • Who funds THE BISON CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC
  • Who funds HOWARD HANNA CHILDREN'S FREE CARE FUND

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo IncNY34.3× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc · The Osc Charitable Foundation · The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation · The John R Oishei Foundation · William & Diane Hein Foundation · Rich Family Foundation · First Niagara Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · J&S Laidig Family Foundation Inc 3717 · Demakos Foundation · The Baird Foundation · Buffalo Bills Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lakeridge Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals67% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lakeridge Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lakeridge Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph