Skip to content
Lake of the Ozarks Shootout Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Lake of the Ozarks Shootout Inc

To raise funds during an annual boat race and donate all the proceeds to local fire departments and other charitable organizations in the community.

$390k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$81k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$562kHuman Services$501kHealth$283kPhilanthropy$181kCommunity Improvement$179kEnvironment$128kCrime & Legal$60kReligion$59kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 19 grants below total $361,760, the rows itemized in this filing. The $390,322 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $28,562 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $62k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $156k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $144k
$12,147
Median grant
1
States reached
$127k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COFFMAN BEND FIRE ASSOCIATION INC$81,289
LAKE OF THE OZARKS WATERSHED ALLIAN$62,762
NORTHWEST FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT$31,661
ELKS LODGE 2705$28,959
LAKE AREA INDUSTRIES INC$22,016
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSOURI$17,186
MID-COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT$17,000
GREENVIEW ELKS LODGE 2857$13,517
SCHOOL OF THE OSAGE UPPER ELEMENTAR$13,111
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE LAKE MA$12,147
OSAGE BEACH FPD$8,612
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA TROOP 21$8,512
DAYBREAK ROTARY$8,173
SUNRISE BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT$7,224
LIVABILITIES$6,702
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $411k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CENTRAL MO FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION: $8k → 10%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSOURI: $17k → 11%KIDS HARBOR: $34k → 13%KIDS HARBOR: $13k → 13%KIDS HARBOR: $6k → 13%KIDS' HARBOR LLC: $6k → 13%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $75k → 13%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $73k → 13%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $53k → 13%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $39k → 13%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $19k → 13%THE CHANGING TABLE: $19k → 13%THE CHANGING TABLE: $17k → 13%THE CHANGING TABLE: $16k → 13%THE CHANGING TABLE: $10k → 13%THE CHANGING TABLE: $7k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 26 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
10

Total granted

$2.5M
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+59%

Still filing today

54%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsEnvironmentRecreation & SportsHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    COFFMAN BEND FIRE ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $328k · revenue +48% · 65% of their budget
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSOURI AND KANSAS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $276k · revenue +100%
  • BA
    BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF LODGE 2705
    6× · 2020–2025 · $193k · revenue +118%

Funded once

  • DD
    DUO DOGS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $34k · revenue +63%
  • MU
    MISC UNDER 5K
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • SC
    SUPER CAT FEST 4 KIDSgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +59%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Diamonds in the Ruff Rescue Mo

Ending pet homelessness and promoting responsible pet ownership by rescuing, rehabilitating, and adopting dogs which originate from animal control, as strays, or owner surrenders.

Animals
2
Clermont County Humane Society

Humane treatment of animals

Animals
3
Safe Harbor Animal Sanctuary

Protect and rescue abandoned and at-risk animals.

Animals
4
Second Chance Animal Refuge Society

No kill animal refuge for abused and homeless animals.

Animals
5
Coffeyville Friends of Animals Inc

Cfa is an organization working to provide dignified and humane care of the unwanted and unclaimed animals in our service area of coffeyville kansas; reduce the number of unwanted and strayed animals through aggressive educational programs…

Animals
6
Lake County Animal Services Dba Orphan Dog Rescue

We provide emergency medical services, spays ands neuters for animals in need.

—
7
Lafferty Volunteer Fire Department

Provide emergency assistance to a rural area

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Central California Labrador Retriever Rescue

Dog rescue and adoption

Animals
9
Marion County Humane Society

The marion county humane society was established for the purpose of providing temporary care and housing of stray or homeless dogs and cats, to assist in the return of lost dogs and cats to their owners, to provide a means of finding new…

Animals
10
Boone County Casa

Advocacy for abused and neglected children

Crime & Legal
11
Bicycle Coalition of the Ozarks
—
12
Loaves & Fishes Inc

Community kitchen and food pantry for needy in monett, missouri

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Missouri and Kansas; the most unlike its peers is Dogwood Animal Shelter Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COFFMAN BEND FIRE ASSOCIATION: $327,595 · OtherCOFFMAN BEND FIRE ASSOCIATIONOTHERS RECEIVING 5000 EACH: $238,288 · OtherOTHERS RECEIVING 5000 EACHBENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF LODGE 2705: $193,482 · OtherBENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF LODGE 2705GREENVIEW ELKS LODGE 2857: $156,351 · OtherGREENVIEW ELKS LODGE 2857NORTHWEST FIRE DISTRICT: $145,155 · OtherNORTHWEST FIRE DISTRICTLAURIE SUNRISE BEACH ROTARY CLUB: $111,803 · OtherLAURIE SUNRISE BEACH ROTARY CLUBMID-CO FIRE DISTRICT: $96,778 · OtherLake Ozarks West Chamber of Co: $86,246 · Other+23 more: $630,032 · Other+23 moreMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSOURI AND KANSAS: $276,293 · Human ServicesMAKE-A-WISH FOUND…THE CHANGING TABLE: $68,762 · Human ServicesTHE CHANGING TABL…KIDS HARBOR INC: $58,749 · Human ServicesKIDS HARBOR INC+1 more: $7,575 · Human ServicesLAKE OF THE OZARKS WATERSHED ALLIAN: $191,194 · EnvironmentCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC: $90,430 · PhilanthropyDogwood Animal Shelter Inc: $13,165 · AnimalsMISSOURI FORGET-ME-NOT HORSE RESCUE SANCTUARY: $5,325 · AnimalsLake Regional Health System: $13,360 · HealthSUPER CAT FEST 4 KIDS: $12,000 · Public Benefit
Other$1,985,730Human Services$411,379Environment$191,194Philanthropy$90,430Animals$18,490Health$13,360Public Benefit$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOFFMAN BEND FIRE ASSOCIATION: $327,595 over 6y, 65% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSOURI AND KANSAS: $276,293 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetBENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF LODGE 2705: $193,482 over 6y, 20% of budgetLAKE OF THE OZARKS WATERSHED ALLIAN: $191,194 over 6y, 24% of budgetGREENVIEW ELKS LODGE 2857: $156,351 over 5y, 35% of budgetLAURIE SUNRISE BEACH ROTARY CLUB: $111,803 over 5y, 78% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC: $90,430 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLake Ozarks West Chamber of Co: $86,246 over 6y, 18% of budgetTHE CHANGING TABLE: $68,762 over 5y, 27% of budgetKIDS HARBOR INC: $58,749 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetRAISING HOPE FREE STORE: $58,104 over 2y, 41% of budgetLAKE AREA INDUSTRIES INC: $56,093 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetDUO DOGS INC: $33,750 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetWONDERLAND CAMP FOUNDATION: $19,745 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLake Regional Health System: $13,360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDogwood Animal Shelter Inc: $13,165 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSUPER CAT FEST 4 KIDS: $12,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCamdenton Lakers Youth Football League: $8,565 over 1y, 12% of budgetDAYBREAK ROTARY CHARITY FUND OF LAK: $8,173 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetCENTRAL MISSOURI FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION ASSOCIATION: $7,575 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCITIZENS AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $6,665 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMary Mother of the Church Council NO 10381 Knights of Columbus: $5,746 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetMISSOURI FORGET-ME-NOT HORSE RESCUE SANCTUARY: $5,325 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COFFMAN BEND FIRE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSOURI AND KANSAS ↗
  • Who funds BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF LODGE 2705 ↗
  • Who funds LAKE OF THE OZARKS WATERSHED ALLIAN ↗
  • Who funds GREENVIEW ELKS LODGE 2857 ↗
  • Who funds LAURIE SUNRISE BEACH ROTARY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
  • Who funds Lake Ozarks West Chamber of Co ↗
  • Who funds THE CHANGING TABLE ↗
  • Who funds KIDS HARBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds RAISING HOPE FREE STORE ↗
  • Who funds LAKE AREA INDUSTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds DUO DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds WONDERLAND CAMP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Lake Regional Health System ↗
  • Who funds Dogwood Animal Shelter Inc ↗
  • Who funds SUPER CAT FEST 4 KIDS ↗
  • Who funds Camdenton Lakers Youth Football League ↗
  • Who funds DAYBREAK ROTARY CHARITY FUND OF LAK ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL MISSOURI FOSTER CARE & ADOPTION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds Mary Mother of the Church Council NO 10381 Knights of Columbus ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI FORGET-ME-NOT HORSE RESCUE SANCTUARY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …United Way of Central…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile FoundationFidelity Investments …
Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO22.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · United Way of Central Missouri Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lake of the Ozarks Shootout Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lake of the Ozarks Shootout Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lake of the Ozarks Shootout Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Lake of the Ozarks Shootout Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lake of the Ozarks Shootout’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home