Skip to content

· Private foundation

LAiglon Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$293k
Granted FY2024still arriving
60
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$606kPhilanthropy$482kArts & Culture$270kHealth$223kEnvironment$150kRecreation & Sports$144kCivil Rights$104kYouth Development$91kOther$0
02FY2024 · 60 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k49 grants · $128k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $166k
$2,500
Median grant
13
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Schwab Charitable$31,100
Notley Impact$22,500
ASSUMPTION HIGH SCHOOL$16,000
MT CARMEL HIGH SCHOOL$16,000
Princeton University$15,000
King Ranch Family Trust$15,000
Real Clear Foundation$10,000
Princeton for Free Speech$10,000
Leadership Institute$10,000
Texas Parks and Wildlife Foundation$10,000
Making Gay History Inc$10,000
Habitat for Humanity Monterey Bay$7,500
ESTEAM Foundation$7,000
New York Foundation for the Arts$5,500
Texas Foundation for Conservation$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%Larkin Street Youth Services: $6k → 10%Larkin Street Youth Services: $4k → 10%Larkin Street Youth Services: $3k → 10%Prison Entrepreneurship Program Inc: $1k → 16%Prison Entrepreneurship Program Inc: $1k → 16%Larkin Street Youth Services: $2k → 10%El Centro de la Raza: $5k → 9%El Centro de la Raza: $4k → 9%El Centro de la Raza: $4k → 9%El Centro de la Raza: $3k → 9%El Centro de la Raza: $3k → 9%The Other Ones Foundation Inc: $5k → 10%Charity Global Inc: $1k → 17%Charity Global Inc: $1k → 17%Charity Water: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of LAiglon Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 40% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 43%.

LAiglon Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 116 repeat orgs$292k to everyone else

116 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2024, 73 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

116
74

Total granted

$1.9M
$229k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+30%

Still filing today

64%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $150k · revenue +5%
  • KR
    KING RANCH FAMILY TRUST
    8× · 2017–2024 · $109k · revenue +181%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • PA
    Parks and Wildlife Foundation of TX
    one grant, 2017 · $26k
  • TC
    Taking Care of Texasgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +136%
  • SF
    ST FRANCES ACADEMY
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
2
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
3
Aclu Foundation of Texas Inc

The ACLU Foundation of Texas is the unyielding guardian and promoter of freedom, justice, equality and dignity of all people, particularly for those who are still fighting to secure the full exercise of their civil rights and liberties.…

Civil Rights
4
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
5
Uatx

Uatx is a nonprofit dedicated to building a liberal arts university committed to freedom of inquiry, freedom of conscience, and civil discourse. to maintain these principles, the university will be fiercely independent financially,…

Education
6
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
7
Association of Legal Administrators

Ala is the catalyst for growth by providing: diverse educational experiences, engaged peer communities, strategic solutions, dynamic resources, and trusted networks.

—
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
9
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

—
10
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
11
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
12
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Jersey Seeds Inc; the most unlike its peers is A Glimmer of Hope Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

127 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 127 of the 209 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
27
Early backer (in before they grew)
124/127
Grantees still filing
80/127
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KING RANCH FAMILY TRUST: $109,000 · OtherKING RANCH FAMILY TRUSTMT CARMEL HIGH SCHOOL: $77,000 · OtherMT CARMEL HIGH SCHOOLASSUMPTION HIGH SCHOOL: $72,000 · OtherASSUMPTION HIGH SCHOOLCOLIBRI GRANTS INC: $51,775 · OtherPrinceton for Free Speech: $44,900 · Other+130 more: $963,294 · Other+130 moreThe Trustees of Princeton University: $149,500 · EducationThe Trustees of …REAL CLEAR FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationREAL CLEAR FOUND…CODEORG: $28,000 · EducationCODEORGBLACK GIRLS CODE INC: $24,096 · EducationBLACK GIRLS CODE…NOTLEY IMPACT: $22,500 · EducationNOTLEY IMPACTKleberg County Adult Literacy Council: $19,710 · EducationKleberg County A…IVY FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION INC: $17,000 · EducationNEW JERSEY SEEDS INC: $15,000 · Education+9 more: $49,700 · Education+9 moreDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $243,469 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED …South Texas Charity Weekend Inc: $51,000 · PhilanthropySouth Texas Ch…+8 more: $25,650 · Philanthropy+8 moreMaking Gay History Inc: $33,000 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN CREATIVE ALLIANCE: $33,000 · Arts & CultureRiver Oaks Chamber Orchestra: $25,000 · Arts & CultureZACHARY SCOTT THEATRE CENTER: $8,930 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $8,375 · Arts & CultureCenter for the Art of Translation: $6,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC: $5,500 · Arts & CultureIngersoll Gender Center: $5,500 · Arts & Culture+7 more: $11,000 · Arts & CulturePLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $70,000 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $17,500 · HealthCreative Growth Art Center: $16,000 · HealthFRIEDREICH'S ATAXIA RESEARCH ALLIANCE: $7,500 · Health+6 more: $13,500 · HealthPARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $37,000 · EnvironmentIRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC: $25,500 · EnvironmentTaking Care of Texas: $20,000 · EnvironmentLAND PRESERVATION TRUST INC: $13,000 · EnvironmentFOREVER MARYLAND INC: $6,000 · EnvironmentTHE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA: $5,000 · EnvironmentTHE GREAT SPRINGS PROJECT INC (AUDIT): $4,000 · Environment+4 more: $7,000 · EnvironmentHEALTH START FOUNDATION INC: $80,720 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $1,100 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,317,969Education$355,506Philanthropy$320,119Arts & Culture$136,305Health$124,500Environment$117,500Food & Nutrition$81,820

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $243,469 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $149,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetKING RANCH FAMILY TRUST: $109,000 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetHEALTH START FOUNDATION INC: $80,720 over 7y, 45% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $70,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSouth Texas Charity Weekend Inc: $51,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetPARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $37,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMaking Gay History Inc: $33,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetAUSTIN CREATIVE ALLIANCE: $33,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetREAL CLEAR FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBaltimoreans United in Leadership Development Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCODEORG: $28,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $27,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC: $25,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRiver Oaks Chamber Orchestra: $25,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBLACK GIRLS CODE INC: $24,096 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNOTLEY IMPACT: $22,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $20,626 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGILROY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTaking Care of Texas: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetKleberg County Adult Literacy Council: $19,710 over 3y, 12% of budgetFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC: $19,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM CENTER TEXAS: $17,316 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetGIRLSTART: $16,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCreative Growth Art Center: $16,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $15,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF TRAVIS COUNTY: $15,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION CAPITAL: $15,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNEW JERSEY SEEDS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services: $14,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL: $14,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLAND PRESERVATION TRUST INC: $13,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSVP AUSTIN INC: $11,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetTHE VALLEYS PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $10,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetInneract Project Inc: $10,500 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetADA DEVELOPERS ACADEMY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN EMPOWERED: $9,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF KLEBERG COUNTY: $9,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetPRINCETON PROSPECT FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetZACHARY SCOTT THEATRE CENTER: $8,930 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $8,375 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL SPORTING LIBRARY AND MUSEUM: $8,200 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGirls Leadership Institute Inc dba Girls Leadership: $8,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds KING RANCH FAMILY TRUST ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH START FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds South Texas Charity Weekend Inc ↗
  • Who funds PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Making Gay History Inc ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN CREATIVE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds REAL CLEAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Baltimoreans United in Leadership Development Inc ↗
  • Who funds CODEORG ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds IRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds River Oaks Chamber Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds BLACK GIRLS CODE INC ↗
  • Who funds NOTLEY IMPACT ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds GILROY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Taking Care of Texas ↗
  • Who funds Kleberg County Adult Literacy Council ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM CENTER TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds IVY FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX35.1× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800 · Brown Advisory Charitable Foundation Inc · The Moody Foundation · Better Business Bureau · St David's Foundation · The Cynthia & George Mitchell Foundation · The Applied Materials Foundation · Tingari Foundation · Naylor Family Foundation · The Webber Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization LAiglon Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from LAiglon Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Raritan Headwaters Association: 94% of income from government
  • Land Preservation Trust Inc: 64% of income from government
  • Gunpowder Valley Conservancy Inc: 20% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • Maryland Historical Society Inc: 9% of income from government
  • National Center for Jewish Filminc: 4% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
31report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to LAiglon Fund?

Find your warmest path to LAiglon Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 209 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on LAiglon’s filings →

More from the funding graph