Skip to content

· Private foundation

Laham Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$103k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$294kReligion$214kHuman Services$93kYouth Development$31kArts & Culture$24kInternational$16kHealth$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $76k
$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WICHITA COLLEGIATE SCHOOL$32,800
RAINBOWS UNITED$27,000
ANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN ARCHDIOCESE$16,000
ST GEORGE ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CATHEDRAL$6,200
ST MARY ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHURCH$6,030
UJUMP INC$6,000
COLLEGE NOTRE DAME DU BALAMAND$1,500
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$1,200
THE TREEHOUSE$1,000
KETCH$600
GUADALUPE CLINIC$500
FREEDOM HOOVES THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER$500
CHRIST THE SAVIOR ACADEMY$500
WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME$500
MARK ARTS$350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AINSLEY'S ANGLES OF AMERICA: $300 → 10%KETCH: $670 → 16%KETCH: $600 → 16%RAINBOWS UNITED: $27k → 16%RAINBOWS UNITED: $4k → 16%The Treehouse: $2k → 16%THE TREEHOUSE: $1k → 16%The Treehouse: $250 → 16%RAINBOWS UNITED: $1k → 16%RAINBOWS UNITED: $240 → 16%HARRY HYNES MEMORIAL HOSPICE: $200 → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $150 → 16%Pando Initiative: $50 → 16%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $3k → 16%WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $500 → 16%Wichita Childrens Home: $150 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
VA
MD
KS
OK
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$639k · 32 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
70

Total granted

$639k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+20%

Still filing today

63%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WICHITA COLLEGIATE SCHOOL
    5× · 2019–2025 · $73k · revenue +39%
  • MA
    MARK ARTS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +195%
  • WG
    WICHITA GRAND OPERA INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $9k · revenue +104%

Funded once

  • WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue -10%
  • ST
    STAND TOGETHER
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • WP
    WICHITA POLICE AND FIRE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +71%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wichita Eye Foundation

To engage in grant making to medical educational organizations and related charitable activities in the area of eye disease and vision disorder, and the care and treatment thereof.

Health
2
Wichitas Littlest Heroes

Wichita's littlest heroes (wlh) exists to provide hope, help, and happiness to families of children ages 0-18 in the kansas area who are battling life-threatening medical conditions. wlh strives to accomplish this be being a physical and…

Human Services
3
Wichita Regional Chamber of Commerce Inc

To drive economic growth and community advancement in the wichita region.

—
4
Wichita Montessori School Inc

We seek to provide a superior educational experience for children ages 3 to 11, utilizing the montessori methods of teaching and learning. we address the intellectual, emotional, physical and social growth of each child.

—
5
Wichita Area Sexual Assault Center Inc

Wichita area sexual assault center works with individuals and communities through comprehensive services and education to create a culture of intolerance for sexual violence and an atmosphere of healing for those impacted by it.

Health
6
Kansas Wesleyan University

Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.

Education
7
Wichita Downtown Development Corporation

The mission of Downtown Wichita is to cultivate opportunities that revitalize and enhance Wichita's urban core.

Community Improvement
8
Opportunity Wichita Inc

Engage community partners (including local governments, nonprofit organizations, and public institutions) to develop a community vision to address education, quality of life, infrastructure, workforce, and economic development and…

Community Improvement
9
Kansas Bioscience Organization Inc

Biokansas is the unified voice representing the biosciences in kansas. across the human, plant, animal and industrial biosciences, biokansas is focused on enhancing the business and research climate and working with leaders across the…

Education
10
Kansas Chapter American Academy of Pediatrics Inc

Ensuring that all children and youth can reach their full potential for physical, mental, emotional, and social health, growing up safe, strong, and with confidence in the future.

Education
11
Wichita Center for Graduate Medical Education Inc

On behalf of the university of kansas school of medicine-wichita, wcgme administers the graduate medical education program for resident physicians in the city of wichita, kansas. wcgme's involvement in graduate medical education in wichita…

Education
12
Wichita Foundation

The wichita foundation invests in people and ideas to spark change, and envisions a place where all wichitans thrive and belong. as community conveners, the foundation leads with courage, grows equitable relationships, ignites philanthropy…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wichita State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Timothy P O'shaughnessy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 111 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/43
Grantees still filing
33/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST GEORGE ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CATHEDRAL: $117,766 · OtherST GEORGE ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CATHEDRALSt Mary Orthodox Christian Church: $64,335 · OtherSt Mary Orthodox Christian ChurchRainbows: $50,617 · OtherRainbowsANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN ARCHDIOCESE: $26,000 · OtherANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN ARCHDIOCESE+80 more: $61,768 · Other+80 moreYouth Entrepreneurs Inc: $195,923 · EducationYouth Entrepreneurs IncWICHITA COLLEGIATE SCHOOL: $72,705 · EducationWICHITA COLLEGIATE SCHOOLWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $11,050 · Education+6 more: $8,600 · EducationRAINBOWS UNITED INC: $32,085 · Human ServicesTHE TREEHOUSE INC: $3,381 · Human ServicesTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $3,150 · Human Services+5 more: $1,970 · Human ServicesMARK ARTS INC: $13,100 · Arts & CultureWICHITA GRAND OPERA INC: $9,167 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $1,150 · Arts & CultureUJUMP INC: $21,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $600 · Youth DevelopmentWICHITA POLICE AND FIRE FOUNDATION: $5,250 · Public Safety & DisasterPROJECT MEXICO OF THE ORTHODOX CHURCH: $3,125 · International
Other$320,486Education$288,278Human Services$40,586Arts & Culture$23,417Youth Development$21,600Public Safety & Disaster$5,250International$3,125

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYouth Entrepreneurs Inc: $195,923 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetWICHITA COLLEGIATE SCHOOL: $72,705 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRAINBOWS UNITED INC: $32,085 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUJUMP INC: $21,000 over 4y, 9.6% of budgetMARK ARTS INC: $13,100 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $11,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA GRAND OPERA INC: $9,167 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetWICHITA POLICE AND FIRE FOUNDATION: $5,250 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetCHRIST THE SAVIOR ACADEMY INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE TREEHOUSE INC: $3,381 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $3,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT MEXICO OF THE ORTHODOX CHURCH: $3,125 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWICHITA CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,250 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetKANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC: $2,150 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKANSAS ELKS TRAINING CENTER FOR THE HANDICAPPED INC: $1,270 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCars for Charities Co: $750 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $725 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGuadalupe Clinic Inc: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDUI VICTIMS CENTER OF KANSAS INC: $500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSPORTING WICHITA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR ANDOVER SCHOOLS: $450 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOTANICA INC: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KANSAS AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM INC: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAINSLEY'S ANGELS OF AMERICA: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetArtist Outreach Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetORPHEUM PERFORMING ARTS CENTRE LTD: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH HORIZONS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC THEATRE WICHITA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHarry Hynes Memorial Hospice Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEN & SWORD: $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIMOTHY P O'SHAUGHNESSY FOUNDATION: $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PANDO INITIATIVE INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Youth Entrepreneurs Inc ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA COLLEGIATE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOWS UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds UJUMP INC ↗
  • Who funds MARK ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA GRAND OPERA INC ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA POLICE AND FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST THE SAVIOR ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TREEHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT MEXICO OF THE ORTHODOX CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS ELKS TRAINING CENTER FOR THE HANDICAPPED INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Cars for Charities Co ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353RI45.8× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Wichita Foundation · Berry Foundation Inc · Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable Trust · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · United Way of the Plains Inc · Ima Foundation · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · The David and Debbi Elkouri Foundation · K T Wiedemann Foundation Inc · Belin Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Laham Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Laham Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Laham Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Laham Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 111 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Laham Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph