Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ladies of Charity of Austin

TO SERVE THE SICK AND LONELY AND PROVIDE FOR THE SPIRITUAL AND CORPORAL WELFARE OF THE POOR AND NEEDY OF THE COMMUNITY.

$939k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$925k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$1.9MEducation$1.0MHuman Services$130kFood & Nutrition$91kReligion$25kCrime & Legal$25k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
  • $250k+1 grant · $925k
$11,734
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Housing Authority of the City of Au$925,000
Society of St Vincent de Paul$11,734
Daughters of Charity$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AGE of Central Texas: $2k → 10%Family Eldercare: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 3 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +202% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
20

Total granted

$1.1M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+202%
0%

Still filing today

33%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterReligionHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    Housing Authority of the City of Au
    2× · 2024–2025 · $935k
  • TS
    THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN
    5× · 2017–2025 · $92k · revenue +202%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k

Funded once

  • FC
    FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1.0M · revenue 0%
  • SE
    St Edwards University
    one grant, 2024 · $1.0M · revenue -11%
  • GT
    Grants to nonprofits Attachment C
    one grant, 2023 · $61k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
HomeAid Austin Inc

Engage in building procted to provide emergency shelters, transitional housing, and permanent housing while offering job skills training and support to help residents move toward self-sufficiency.

Employment
2
Austin Affordable Housing Corporation

To ensure and preserve quality, affordable housing opportunities for low- to moderate-income families in austin as well as provide financial literacy and homeownership opportunities.

Housing & Shelter
3
Austin Street Center

The mission of austin street center is to provide emergency shelter and related services to the homeless. programs provide crisis intervention, substance abuse awareness information and opportunities to improve present life situations to…

—
4
Austin Habitat for Humanity Inc

Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
5
HousingWorks Austin

To provide research, education and advocacy related to affordable housing

Housing & Shelter
6
Affordable Homes of South Texas Inc

Affordable Homes of South Texas, Inc. is organized for the purpose of providing housing for qualified low-income families within the City of McAllen, Texas and Hidalgo County, Texas.

Housing & Shelter
7
Lake Travis Crisis Ministries

Meet the short-term needs of people in crisis situations by providing immediate help in the form of food & financial assistance. Long-term assistance may also be provided.

Human Services
8
LifeHouse of Houston Inc

LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.

—
9
Castle Care Community Ministries

Our mission is to end Veteran homelessness in Texas and throughout America by providing shelter, transitional living, counseling, case management, job training and job placement.

Housing & Shelter
10
Vincare Services of Austin Foundation

To empower women with children to overcome homelessness. saint louise house provides long term housing and support services to homeless women with children.

—
11
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
12
Atx Helps

ATX Helps was created to fill gaps in the spectrum of services available to people in Austin who are experiencing homelessness.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mobile Loaves & Fishes Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Society of St Vincent De Paul Diocesan Council of Austin. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
2/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Housing Authority of the City of Au: $935,000 · OtherHousing Authority of the City of AuTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN: $92,280 · OtherTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESA…Grants to nonprofits Attachment C: $60,774 · Other+13 more: $76,026 · Other+13 moreFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC: $1,000,000 · Housing & ShelterFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC+1 more: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterSt Edwards University: $1,000,000 · EducationSt Edwards UniversityBRIDGES TO LIFE: $25,000 · Crime & LegalMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $10,320 · ReligionAustin City Lutherans: $5,000 · ReligionFAMILY ELDERCARE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesAUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY: $1,500 · Human Services
Other$1,164,080Housing & Shelter$1,005,000Education$1,000,000Crime & Legal$25,000Religion$15,320Human Services$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSt Edwards University: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN: $92,280 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetBRIDGES TO LIFE: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $10,320 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Low-Income Housing Information Service: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAustin City Lutherans: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFAMILY ELDERCARE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds St Edwards University ↗
  • Who funds THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES TO LIFE ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of Central Texas ↗
  • Who funds Texas Low-Income Housing Information Service ↗
  • Who funds Austin City Lutherans ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY ELDERCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · United Way for Greater Austin · St David's Foundation · Strake Foundation · The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · Donald D Hammill Foundation · The Rachael and Ben Vaughan Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ladies of Charity of Austin funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ladies of Charity of Austin. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ladies of Charity of Austin?

    Find your warmest path to Ladies of Charity of Austin through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ladies of Charity of Austin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph