Skip to content

· Private foundation

Labatt Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$625k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$556k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$3.4MEducation$624kArts & Culture$361kHealth$36kEnvironment$28kReligion$15kYouth Development$9kAnimals$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $39k
  • $250k+1 grant · $556k
$5,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Southwest Community Foundation$556,000
OPERA SAN ANTONIO$19,200
Classical Music Institute$10,000
Tobin Center for the Performing Art$10,000
Zoo Ball San Antonio$7,500
Autism Community Network$5,500
Christus Childrens Foundation$5,000
Trinity University Press$4,500
McNay Art Museum$3,500
Boy Scouts of America$2,500
San Antonio ISD Athletics$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SMITH COLLEGE: $10k → 12%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEW COLLEGE: $32k → 6%American Friends of New College: $10k → 7%TEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY: $150k → 10%Southwest Community Foundation: $562k → 14%HEADWATERS AT INCARNATE WORD: $20k → 16%Houston Grand Opera: $11k → 16%Snack Pack 4 Kids: $5k → 20%Ancient Art Archive: $10k → 13%Junior Achievement USA: $6k → 9%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $40k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $100k → 8%TEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY: $125k → 10%Southwest Community Foundation: $556k → 14%ALAMO HEIGHTS PRESBYTERIAN: $10k → 16%Houston Grand Opera: $10k → 16%TEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY: $75k → 10%Southwest Community Foundation: $540k → 14%Alamo Heights Presbyterian: $10k → 16%HOUSTON GRAND OPERA: $10k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $20k → 8%Southwest Community Foundation: $516k → 14%Alamo Heights Presbyterian Church: $10k → 16%HOUSTON GRAND OPERA: $10k → 16%SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $445k → 14%McNay Art Museum: $9k → 16%HOUSTON GRAND OPERA: $5k → 16%Southwest Community Foundation: $430k → 14%TEXAS CAVALIERS: $6k → 16%HOUSTON GRAND OPERA: $5k → 16%SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $312k → 14%SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $38k → 14%OPERA SAN ANTONIO: $19k → 16%Classical Music Institute: $10k → 16%CHRISTUS Children's in San Antonio: $40k → 14%Tobin Center for the Performing Art: $10k → 16%Autism Community Network: $6k → 16%OPERA SAN ANTONIO: $35k → 16%OPERA SAN ANTONIO: $30k → 16%OPERA SAN ANTONIO: $20k → 16%Christus Children's Hospital of San Antonio: $25k → 16%OPERA SAN ANTONIO: $60k → 16%OPERA SAN ANTONIO: $45k → 16%Opera San Antonio: $25k → 16%Opera San Antonio: $20k → 16%Zoo Ball San Antonio: $8k → 16%CHRISTA ROSA FOUNDATION: $8k → 16%Arc Humanities: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
TN
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 11 repeat orgs$255k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
20

Total granted

$4.3M
$209k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+44%

Still filing today

73%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    TEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2018–2020 · $350k · revenue +16%
  • TO
    THE OPERA SAN ANTONIO DBA OPERA SAN AN
    8× · 2017–2025 · $254k · revenue +63%
  • HG
    Houston Grand Opera Association Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $51k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHRISTUS Children's in San Antonio
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    one grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue +5%
  • CC
    Christus Children's Hospital of San Antonio
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Museum of Fine Arts Houston

The museum of fine arts, houston serves as a welcoming and inclusive place for all people, connecting the communities of houston with diverse histories of art spanning 6,000 years and six continents. through our permanent collections,…

Arts & Culture
2
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
3
San Antonio Museum of Art

The San Antonio Museum of Art brings people together with art by collecting, preserving, and presenting significant works of art representing a broad range of history and cultures, advancing human connection and understanding, and…

Arts & Culture
4
Texas Public Radio

The mission of Texas Public Radio is to engage, inspire and inform, bringing people together to better understand their community and world.

Arts & Culture
5
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
6
Artpace Inc (Audit)

Artpace san antonio is a nonprofit residency program which supports texas, national, and international artists in the creation of new art. see schedule o for continuation.

Arts & Culture
7
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
8
Universidad Del Sagrado Corazon Inc

The universidad del sagrado corazon (sagrado) is an independent, nonprofit, catholic university, committed to the education of the whole person through strong foundation in the liberal arts. sagrado is part of puerto ricos oldest private,…

Education
9
Saint Ann's School

Saint ann's exists to nurture the wonder of children. unfettered by grades, teachers and students embark on journeys of discovery in which the arts are central. through an ambitious curriculum and a culture of inquiry, we question the…

Education
10
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
11
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
12
University of Texas At San Antonio Alumni Association

To engage our alumni in activities that will advance utsa as a top-tier institution. our focus is to deliver value-added services and events where our alumni can connect with each other, with current students and/or with the university. we…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humanities Texas; the most unlike its peers is Ancient Art Archive. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Southwest Community Foundation: $3,398,782 · OtherSouthwest Community FoundationTEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY: $350,000 · OtherTEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY+25 more: $311,294 · Other+25 moreTHE OPERA SAN ANTONIO DBA OPERA SAN AN: $254,200 · Arts & CultureHouston Grand Opera Association Inc: $50,738 · Arts & CultureMCNAY ART MUSEUM: $15,500 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $22,000 · Arts & CultureThe Trustees of Princeton University: $40,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEW COLLEGE LTD: $42,000 · InternationalHeadwaters at Incarnate Word Inc: $20,000 · Crime & LegalPHIL HARDBERGER PARK CONSERVANCY: $8,000 · Recreation & SportsJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA: $6,000 · Youth Development
Other$4,060,076Arts & Culture$342,438Education$50,000International$42,000Crime & Legal$20,000Recreation & Sports$8,000Youth Development$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY: $350,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE OPERA SAN ANTONIO DBA OPERA SAN AN: $254,200 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetHouston Grand Opera Association Inc: $50,738 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEW COLLEGE LTD: $42,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHeadwaters at Incarnate Word Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetMCNAY ART MUSEUM: $15,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetClassical Music Institute CMI: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetANCIENT ART ARCHIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPHIL HARDBERGER PARK CONSERVANCY: $8,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TEXAS CAVALIERS: $5,750 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO ACADEMY OF TEXAS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANITIES TEXAS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIMANI COLLECTIVE: $900 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE OPERA SAN ANTONIO DBA OPERA SAN AN ↗
  • Who funds Houston Grand Opera Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEW COLLEGE LTD ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds Headwaters at Incarnate Word Inc ↗
  • Who funds MCNAY ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Classical Music Institute CMI ↗
  • Who funds ANCIENT ART ARCHIVE ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PHIL HARDBERGER PARK CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA ↗
  • Who funds THE TEXAS CAVALIERS ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SERVICE CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO DBA AUTISM COMMUNITY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO ACADEMY OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds HUMANITIES TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds IMANI COLLECTIVE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX23.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · The Tobin Endowment · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Semmes Foundation Inc · Charitable Foundation Frost F0359600 · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Betty Stieren Kelso Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Louis H and Mary Patricia Stumberg Foundation · Impetus Foundation · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Labatt Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Labatt Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Labatt Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Labatt Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Labatt’s filings →

More from the funding graph