Skip to content
La Habra Community Support Foundati at a glance

· Public charity

La Habra Community Support Foundati

To support non-profit organizations within the la habra community and to carry on other charitable and education activities associated with this goal.

$184k
Granted FY2021
7
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Recreation & Sports$95kEducation$90kHealth$45kHousing & Shelter$41kArts & Culture$33kHuman Services$31kFood & Nutrition$30kOther$0
02FY2021 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $179k
$28,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADVANCE$40,000
ROSIES GARAGE$31,031
HELP FOR BRAIN INJURED CHILDREN INC$30,000
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDRENS MUSEUM AT$28,000
CITRUS COLLEGE FOUNDATION$26,500
CYPRESS COLLEGE FOUNDATION$23,000
LA HABRA OLD SETTLERS HISTORICAL SO$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WHITTIER AREA INTERFAITH COUNCIL: $25k → 14%OC WALK TO REMEMBER INC: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Habra High School Boys Basketball Booster Club

To provide support to the la habra boys basketall program promote good sportsmanship

Education
2
Los Alamitos Baseball Booster Club

Provide uniforms, equipment, tournament fees, field maintenance at LAHS through donations and fundraising.

Recreation & Sports
3
La Habra High School Grad Night

Participation for all senior students to participate in grad night ceremonies

Education
4
Irvine High School Athletic Boosters Club Inc

To support irvine High schools sports programs

Education
5
La Habra School Football Boosters Club

To provide organized support tothe football program at la habra high school; promote good sportmsmanship; and support the other school sanctioned organizations at la habra high

Education
6
Oxnard Homeless Prevntion
Human Services
7
La Habra City Little League Inc

Little league baseball organization

—
8
Los Alamitos High School Softball Boosters Inc

To support the Los Alamitos High School Softball program through donations and time.

Recreation & Sports
9
Los Al Boys Soccer Booster Club

To raise funds to financially support the Los Alamitos High School Boys' Soccer program.

Education
10
On Deck Crew Softball Boosters Inc

To provide support and funding for the girls softball program at citrus valley high school.

Education
11
La Habra Collaborative

Create opportunities to improve qualit of life

—
12
Hand to Hand Relief Organization

Provide aide and food to disabled locals and homeless

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Habra Community Resources Council; the most unlike its peers is La Habra Old Settlers Historical Society Co Kent Roberts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/14
Grantees still filing
4/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ADVANCE: $40,000 · EducationADVANCEROSIES GARAGE: $31,031 · EducationROSIES GARAGECitrus College Foundation: $26,500 · EducationCitrus College FoundationCYPRESS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $23,000 · EducationCYPRESS COLLEGE FOUNDATIONSONORA RAIDERS BASEBALL BOOSTERS: $20,000 · EducationSONORA RAIDERS BASEBALL BOOSTERSTROY BASEBALL BOOSTERS: $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentTROY BASEBALL BOOSTERSLA HABRA MEALS ON WHEELS: $30,000 · OtherLA HABRA MEALS …ANDREWS UMBRELLA: $15,000 · OtherANDREWS UMBRELL…LA HABRA COMMUNITY RESOURCES COUNCIL: $6,000 · OtherLA HABRA COMMUN…WHITTIER AREA INTERFAITH COUNCIL: $25,000 · Human ServicesWHITTIER AR…ORANGE COUNTY WALK TO REMEMBER DBA FOREVER FOOTPRINTS: $15,000 · Human ServicesORANGE COUN…FRIENDS OF THE CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $28,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS O…LA HABRA OLD SETTLERS HISTORICAL SOCIETY CO KENT ROBERTS: $5,000 · Arts & CultureLA HABRA …HELP FOR BRAIN INJURED CHILDREN INC: $30,000 · HealthThe Soup Hour: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$140,531Youth Development$75,000Other$51,000Human Services$40,000Arts & Culture$33,000Health$30,000Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTROY BASEBALL BOOSTERS: $75,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetADVANCE: $40,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetROSIES GARAGE: $31,031 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetHELP FOR BRAIN INJURED CHILDREN INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetLA HABRA MEALS ON WHEELS: $30,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $28,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetCitrus College Foundation: $26,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetWHITTIER AREA INTERFAITH COUNCIL: $25,000 over 1y, 48% of budgetCYPRESS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $23,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetORANGE COUNTY WALK TO REMEMBER DBA FOREVER FOOTPRINTS: $15,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetThe Soup Hour: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetLA HABRA COMMUNITY RESOURCES COUNCIL: $6,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetLA HABRA OLD SETTLERS HISTORICAL SOCIETY CO KENT ROBERTS: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Landmark Certified De…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Landmark Certified Development CorpCA26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Landmark Certified Development Corp · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization La Habra Community Support Foundati funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from La Habra Community Support Foundati. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to La Habra Community Support Foundati?

    Find your warmest path to La Habra Community Support Foundati through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on La Habra Community Support Foundati’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home