Loading…
· Public charity
LA HABRA COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOUNDATI
To support non-profit organizations within the la habra community and to carry on other charitable and education activities associated with this goal.
$184k
Granted FY2021
7
Grants
1
Communities
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2021.
Education$141kYouth Development$75kHuman Services$40kArts & Culture$33kHealth$30kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$51k
02FY2021 · 7 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2021
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $179k
$28,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
- ADVANCE$40,000
- ROSIES GARAGE$31,031
- HELP FOR BRAIN INJURED CHILDREN INC$30,000
- FRIENDS OF THE CHILDRENS MUSEUM AT$28,000
- CITRUS COLLEGE FOUNDATION$26,500
- CYPRESS COLLEGE FOUNDATION$23,000
- LA HABRA OLD SETTLERS HISTORICAL SO$5,000
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 63% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
La Habra School Football Boosters Club
To provide organized support tothe football program at la habra high school; promote good sportmsmanship; and support the other school sanctioned organizations at la habra high
Education
2
La Habra High School Grad Night
Participation for all senior students to participate in grad night ceremonies
Education
3
Los Alamitos Baseball Booster Club
Provide uniforms, equipment, tournament fees, field maintenance at LAHS through donations and fundraising.
Recreation & Sports
4
La Habra High School Boys Basketball Booster Club
To provide support to the la habra boys basketall program promote good sportsmanship
Education
5
Los Alamitos High School
To support the Los Alamitos High School Softball program through donations and time.
Recreation & Sports
6
On Deck Crew Softball Boosters Inc
To provide support and funding for the girls softball program at citrus valley high school.
Education
7
Oxnard Homeless Prevntion
Human Services
8
Los Al Boys Soccer Booster Club
To raise funds to financially support the Los Alamitos High School Boys' Soccer program.
Education
9
Irvine High School Athletic Boosters Club Inc
To support irvine High Schools sports programs
Education
10
La Mirada High School Football Booster Club
Public Charitable purpose
Education
11
La Costa Canyon High School
To provide support for la costa canyon high school's educational & extracurricular activities.
Unclassified
12
Los Angeles County High School for the
Promote the arts and the advancement of young artists by raising and distributing funds to the operation of a public arts high school in los angeles county.
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Habra Community Resources Council and the most unlike its peers is La Habra Old Settlers Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Education$140,531Youth Development$75,000Other$51,000Human Services$40,000Arts & Culture$33,000Health$30,000Food & Nutrition$10,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TROY HIGH SCHOOL BASEBALL BOOSTERS ↗
- Who funds ADVANCE ↗
- Who funds ROSIES GARAGE ↗
- Who funds HELP FOR BRAIN INJURED CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds LA HABRA MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDRENS MUSEUM AT ↗
- Who funds CITRUS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WHITTIER AREA INTERFAITH COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds CYPRESS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SONORA RAIDERS BASEBALL BOOSTERS ↗
- Who funds OC WALK TO REMEMBER INC ↗
- Who funds THE SOUP HOUR ↗
- Who funds LA HABRA COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds LA HABRA OLD SETTLERS HISTORICAL SO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Landmark Certified Development CorpCA26.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Landmark Certified Development Corp · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation LA HABRA COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOUNDATI funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WHITTIER AREA INTERFAITH COUNCIL.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
high risk
2 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.
Legal standing
medium risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 954495511 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on WHITTIER AREA INTERFAITH COUNCIL, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 48% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to La Habra Community Support Foundati?
Find your warmest path to La Habra Community Support Foundati through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines