· Public charity
La Fiesta de Las Seis Banderas Inc
Perform charitable activities within the meaning of internal revenue code section 501(c)(3) & texas tax code section 11.18(c)(1), & specifically as follows: (1) to preserve, protect, & promote the historic culture & aesthetic attributes & traditions of the towns of highland park & university park, texas, including the development &…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $568,056 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $588,256 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $20,200 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k9 grants · $159k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
- $250k+1 grant · $329k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HP EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $328,641 |
| HP ARTS | $80,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE UP LIBRARY | $30,000 |
| CONNECTING POINT OF PARK CITIES | $28,915 |
| HIGHLAND PARK LITERARY FESTIVAL | $25,000 |
| HPHS SCIENCE AND TECH FESTIVAL | $18,000 |
| THE CENTER FOR INTEGRATIVE COUNSELING AND PSYCHOLOGY | $15,000 |
| TO BE LIKE ME | $12,500 |
| MOODY FAMILY YMCA IN THE PARK CITIES | $10,000 |
| CARE DALLAS | $10,000 |
| HPHS STUDENT COUNCIL | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $354k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HPHIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +588%
- HPHighland Park Arts8× · 2017–2025 · $528k · revenue +23% · 81% of their budget
- FOFRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY PARK PUBLIC LIBRARY8× · 2017–2025 · $225k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- TFThe Family Placeone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.
Downtown Dallas, Inc. Foundation is the charitable arm of Downtown Dallas, Inc. whose purpose is to help make the area in and around Downtown Dallas a more vibrant and livable place for both daytime and permanent residents by promoting the…
Downtown Dallas, Inc. (DDI), is the champion of a clean and safe Downtown and of the economic development and vibrancy of this community of diverse, unique neighborhoods. DDI: Mobilizes and amplifies the services of public agencies.…
Provide education support and resources to parents and early childhood educators.
The mission of the Houston Area Parkinson Society is to use a whole-human approach to community building, which reduces the fear and isolation associated with a Parkinson's diagnosis.
Pta texas congress highland park elementary school is a support organization for the students and faculty of highland park elementary school and the austin isd community
To further the education of children in the highland park independent school district ("hpisd")' support and accomplish the educational purposes of the hpisd; support and promote the educational, social, and emotional development of…
The Dallas Parks Foundation is dedicated to preserving, protecting, promoting and enhancing existing Dallas Parks while making a lasting contribution to the Park System by securing funds to promote the use of our parks and support the…
Create an integrated social impact campus for downtown dallas, combining homeless services with innovative new channels to meet the growing needs of the people of dallas. preserve historic buildings and offer new venues and cultural…
Trinity Park Conservancy champions the transformation of the Trinity River to become the heart of Dallas. With the community, the Conservancy will design public spaces that unite us, enrich people's lives through access to nature, create…
The Dallas Bar Association is a nonprofit corporation chartered by the State of Texas to protect and advance the professional interests of persons licensed to practice law in the Dallas area, to improve the relations between the Bench, the…
Dallas Center for Photography's mission is to serve as a focal point for creators and appreciators of all forms of photography through education, mentorship, exhibitions, and community outreach.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Dallas Inc and the most unlike its peers is Connecting Point of Park Cities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Highland Park Arts ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY PARK PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds THE HIGHLAND PARK LITERARY FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTING POINT OF PARK CITIES ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR INTEGRATIVE COUNSELING AND PSYCHOLOGY ↗
- Who funds C A R E DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds HIGHLAND PARK HIGH SCHOOL PTA ↗
- Who funds TO BE LIKE ME ↗
- Who funds TEXAS EATING DISORDERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds DALLAS COUNTY HERITAGE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds The Family Place ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization La Fiesta de Las Seis Banderas Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.