Skip to content

· Private foundation

L Suzio Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$139kRecreation & Sports$30kHuman Services$7kHealth$5kYouth Development$3kPhilanthropy$3kReligion$950Public Safety & Disaster$750Other$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$400
Median grant
4
States reached
$207k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPECIAL OLYMPICS CT$10,000
ST PAUL'S CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$2,250
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INC$775
MERIDEN LIONS CLUB$750
MICHAEL HESSION SCHOLARSHIP FUND$750
XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL$500
CALVANESE FOUNDATION$400
Individual grant recipient$300
MERIDEN FIRE DEPARTMENT LOCAL 1148$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SURREY SERVICES: $100 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
NY
MA
PA
CT
MO
VA
TN
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$173k · 41 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +85% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
46

Total granted

$173k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+85%
+10%

Still filing today

15%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyEducationYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $21k · revenue +101%
  • TM
    THE MANAFORT FAMILY FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $3k · revenue +85%
  • CS
    COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • SAINT ANSELM COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +69%
  • SH
    SACRED HEART ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
9
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
10
Mitchell College

Mitchell college educates students through a highly individualized educational approach that brings forward each student's potential, reveals their strengths, and fosters personal growth.

Education
11
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Main Street Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Manafort Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PAUL'S CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $38,815 · OtherST PAUL'S CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLSPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INC: $21,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INCIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherMERIDEN LIONS CLUB: $6,525 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · Other+72 more: $53,455 · Other+72 moreTHE JOE AND KAY CALVANESE FOUNDATION INC: $3,100 · PhilanthropyTHE MANAFORT FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $2,750 · PhilanthropyKYLE PETTY CHARITY RIDE INC: $250 · Philanthropy+1 more: $100 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INC: $2,225 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $350 · HealthARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $100 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporation: $100 · HealthYALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL: $100 · Health+1 more: $75 · HealthSAINT ANSELM COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $250 · EducationBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF METRO QUEENS INC: $250 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MERIDEN INC: $175 · Youth DevelopmentWomens Sports Foundation: $103 · Recreation & SportsSURREY SERVICES FOR SENIORS INC: $100 · Human Services
Other$177,795Philanthropy$6,200Health$2,950Education$2,250Youth Development$425Recreation & Sports$103Human Services$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INC: $21,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JOE AND KAY CALVANESE FOUNDATION INC: $3,100 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetTHE MANAFORT FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $2,750 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INC: $2,225 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT ANSELM COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOMORROW'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF METRO QUEENS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKYLE PETTY CHARITY RIDE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMITY CHARITABLE TRUST FUND: $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWomens Sports Foundation: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAIN STREET COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSURREY SERVICES FOR SENIORS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAVY-MARINE CORPS RELIEF SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JOE AND KAY CALVANESE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MANAFORT FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT ANSELM COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY8.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization L Suzio Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from L Suzio Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Community Solutions Inc: 55% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Connecticut Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Meriden Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Yale New Haven Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 99 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on L Suzio Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph