Skip to content

· Private foundation

L Shafer Fb Var Charities Xxxxx8001

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$187k
Granted FY2026still arriving
17
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$517kAnimals$194kEnvironment$129kSocial Science$73kEducation$65kHuman Services$65kPhilanthropy$65k
02FY2026 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,998
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LANDMARK SOCIETY OF WESTERN NY INC$10,998
WESTERN MONROE HISTORICAL SOC$10,998
UNITED WAY OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC$10,998
ROCHESTER MUSEUMSCIENCE CENTER$10,998
AMERICAN MUSEUM NATURAL HISTORY$10,998
MUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK$10,998
THE SALVATION ARMY INC$10,998
THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$10,998
SENECA PARK ZOO SOCIETY$10,998
ROCHESTER HISTORICAL SOCIETY$10,998
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY$10,998
THE NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN$10,998
BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORP$10,998
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$10,998
AL SIGL CENTER FOR$10,998
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 41% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 16%SENECA PARK ZOO SOCIETY: $11k → 14%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $11k → 16%THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $11k → 17%BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORP: $11k → 20%THE NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $11k → 28%SENECA PARK ZOO SOCIETY: $11k → 14%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $11k → 16%THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $11k → 17%BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORP: $11k → 20%THE NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $11k → 28%SENECA PARK ZOO SOCIETY: $10k → 14%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $10k → 16%THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $10k → 17%BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORP: $10k → 20%THE NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $10k → 28%AMERICAN MUSEUM NATURAL HISTORY: $11k → 17%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $11k → 28%WESTERN MONROE HISTORICAL SOC: $11k → 14%AMERICAN MUSEUM NATURAL HISTORY: $11k → 17%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $11k → 28%WESTERN MONROE HISTORICAL SOC: $11k → 14%AMERICAN MUSEUM NATURAL HISTORY: $10k → 17%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $10k → 28%WESTERN MONROE HISTORICAL SOC: $10k → 14%MUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $11k → 17%AL SIGL CENTER FOR: $19k → 14%MUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $11k → 17%LANDMARK SOCIETY OF WESTERN NY INC: $11k → 14%MUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $10k → 17%AL SIGL CENTER FOR: $11k → 14%LANDMARK SOCIETY OF WESTERN NY INC: $11k → 14%LANDMARK SOCIETY OF WESTERN NY INC: $10k → 14%AL SIGL CENTER FOR: $10k → 14%DAVID HOCHSTEIN SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $11k → 14%DAVID HOCHSTEIN SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $11k → 14%DAVID HOCHSTEIN SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $10k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF ROCHESTER: $11k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF ROCHESTER: $11k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF ROCHESTER: $10k → 14%ROCHESTER MUSEUMSCIENCE CENTER: $11k → 14%UNITED WAY OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $11k → 14%UNITED WAY OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $11k → 14%ROCHESTER MUSEUMSCIENCE CENTER: $11k → 14%ROCHESTER MUSEUMSCIENCE CENTER: $10k → 14%ROCHESTER HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $11k → 14%THE SALVATION ARMY INC: $11k → 14%ROCHESTER HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $11k → 14%THE SALVATION ARMY INC: $11k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 17 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2026, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
2

Total granted

$1.3M
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+20%

Still filing today

53%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24’25’26
Arts & CultureAnimalsEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN
    8× · 2018–2026 · $76k · revenue +14%
  • Cornell University
    8× · 2018–2026 · $76k · revenue +49%
  • TL
    THE LANDMARK SOCIETY OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC
    8× · 2018–2026 · $76k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • RM
    ROCHESTER MUSEUM &
    one grant, 2018 · $7k
  • AM
    American Museum of Natural History
    one grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
2
National Gallery of Art

The National Gallery of Art serves the nation by welcoming all people to explore and experience art, creativity, and our shared humanity.

Arts & Culture
3
New York Historical Society

The founding mission of the new-york historical society ("the new york historical "tnyh") is to collect, preserve, and interpret, for the broadest possible public, material relevant to the history of the united states in general and of new…

Arts & Culture
4
Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens Inc

Phipps' mission is to inspire and educate all with the beauty and importance of plants, to advance sustainability and promote human and environmental well-being through action and research, and to celebrate its historic glasshouse.

Environment
5
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
6
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
7
Cook Museum of Natural Science
Arts & Culture
8
Baltimore Museum of Art

The baltimore museum of art connects art to baltimore and baltimore to the world, embodying a commitment to artistic excellence and social equity in every decision from art presentation, interpretation, and collecting, to the composition…

Arts & Culture
9
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
10
Municipal Art Society of New York

The municipal art society of new york (mas) lifts up the voices of the people in the debates that shape new york's built environment and leads the way to a more livable city from sidewalk to skyline. mas envisions a future in which all new…

Arts & Culture
11
The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…

Science & Tech
12
Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery

The huntington library, art museum, and botanical gardens shares its world-renowned collections to support scholarship, foster learning, inspire creativity, and offer transformative experiences for diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Botanical Garden; the most unlike its peers is Morgan-Manning House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AL SIGL CENTER FOR: $83,545 · OtherAL SIGL CENTER FORTHE SALVATION ARMY: $75,710 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYDAVID HOCHSTEIN SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $75,710 · OtherDAVID HOCHSTEIN SCHOOL OF MUSICHUMANE SOCIETY OF ROCHESTER: $75,710 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF ROCHESTERUNITED WAY OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $75,710 · OtherUNITED WAY OF GREATER ROCHESTER INCMorgan-Manning House: $75,710 · OtherMorgan-Manning HouseRochester Historical Society: $75,095 · OtherRochester Historical SocietyROCHESTER MUSEUMSCIENCE CENTER: $68,871 · OtherROCHESTER MUSEUMSCIENCE CENTERAMERICAN MUSEUM NATURAL HISTORY: $68,871 · OtherAMERICAN MUSEUM NATURAL HISTORY+1 more: $6,839 · OtherTHE LANDMARK SOCIETY OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC: $75,710 · Arts & CultureTHE LANDMARK SOCIETY…METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $75,710 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM …MUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $75,710 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF THE CITY O…+1 more: $6,839 · Arts & CultureSENECA PARK ZOO SOCIETY: $75,710 · AnimalsSENECA PARK Z…Wildlife Conservation Society: $75,710 · AnimalsWildlife Cons…NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $75,710 · EnvironmentNEW YORK BOTA…BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION: $75,710 · EnvironmentBROOKLYN BOTA…Cornell University: $75,710 · Education
Other$681,771Arts & Culture$233,969Animals$151,420Environment$151,420Education$75,710

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSENECA PARK ZOO SOCIETY: $75,710 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $75,710 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $75,710 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LANDMARK SOCIETY OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC: $75,710 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $75,710 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION: $75,710 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $75,710 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $75,710 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMorgan-Manning House: $75,710 over 8y, 16% of budgetRochester Historical Society: $75,095 over 8y, 11% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History: $6,839 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SENECA PARK ZOO SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds THE LANDMARK SOCIETY OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds Morgan-Manning House ↗
  • Who funds Rochester Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization L Shafer Fb Var Charities Xxxxx8001 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from L Shafer Fb Var Charities Xxxxx8001. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on L Shafer Fb Var Charities Xxxxx8001’s filings →

    More from the funding graph