Skip to content

· Private foundation

L&L Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$455k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$890kReligion$625kYouth Development$150kHuman Services$150kPhilanthropy$60kEmployment$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $280k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
$30,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Bartholomew's Episocopal Church$125,000
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center$50,000
The JED Foundation$30,000
Boomer Esiason Foundation$30,000
St Jude Children's Research Hospital$30,000
Pursuit Transformation Company Inc$30,000
National Foundation for Facial Reconstruction$30,000
Friends of the Children New York$30,000
Partnership With Children Inc$30,000
Alzheimer's Foundation of America$20,000
Cure Alzheimer Fund$20,000
Crossroads Community Services Inc$15,000
SOUTHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOME$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Boomer Esiason Foundation: $30k → 6%Pursuit Transformation Company Inc: $30k → 13%National Foundation for Facial Reconstruction: $30k → 17%The JED Foundation: $30k → 20%St Jude Children's Research Hospital: $30k → 17%Boomer Esiason Foundation: $30k → 6%Pursuit Transformation Company Inc: $30k → 13%National Foundation for Facial Reconstruction: $30k → 17%The JED Foundation: $30k → 20%St Jude Children's Research Hospital: $30k → 17%Boomer Esiason Foundation: $30k → 6%PURSUIT Levelup: $30k → 13%National Foundation for Facial Reconstruction: $30k → 17%The JED Foundation: $30k → 20%St Jude Children's Research Hospital: $25k → 17%Boomer Esiason Foundation: $30k → 6%PURSUIT Levelup: $30k → 13%National Foundation for Facial Reconstruction: $30k → 17%The JED Foundation: $30k → 20%St Jude Children's Research Hospital: $25k → 17%Boomer Esiason Foundation: $25k → 6%PURSUIT Levelup: $30k → 13%National Foundation for Facial Reconstruction: $25k → 17%The JED Foundation: $30k → 20%St Jude Children's Research Hospital: $25k → 17%Boomer Esiason Foundation: $25k → 6%Purauit Levelup: $28k → 13%The JED Foundation: $30k → 20%Partners with Children Inc: $30k → 17%Partnership With Children Inc: $30k → 17%Partners with Children Inc: $30k → 17%Partners with Children Inc: $30k → 17%Partners with Children Inc: $30k → 17%Partners with Children Inc: $30k → 17%St Bartholomew's Episocopal Church: $125k → 17%St Bartholomew's Episocopal Church: $125k → 17%St Bartholomew's Episocopal Church: $125k → 17%St Bartholomew's Episocopal Church: $125k → 17%St Bartholomew's Episocopal Church: $125k → 17%St Bartholomew's Episocopal Church: $125k → 17%Friends of the Children New York: $30k → 17%Friends of the Children New York: $30k → 17%Friends of the Children New York: $30k → 17%Friends of the Children New York: $30k → 17%Friends of the Children New York: $30k → 17%Friends of the Children New York: $30k → 17%Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: $50k → 17%Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: $30k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 13 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

$2.3M
$28k

Still filing today

62%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TJ
    THE JED FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $180k · revenue +142%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN- NEW YORK
    6× · 2020–2025 · $180k · revenue +31%
  • NF
    NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $170k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $28k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Tumor Foundation

Our mission: drive research, expand knowledge, and advance care for the nf community. our vision: end nf.

Health
2
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
3
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Families Together in New York State Inc

Establish a unified voice for children and youth with emotional, behavioral, and social challenges. the organizational mission is to ensure that every family has access to needed information, support, and services.

Human Services
5
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
1199SEIUGREATER New York Child Care

To establish child care youth programs and related services for fund eligible 1199 members in order to increase their access to high quality, affordable child care and youth related services and information. to assist parents reconciling…

Membership Benefit
11
Alternatives for Children

To provide quality programs for young children with special needs.

—
12
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partnership With Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Crossroads Community Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Bartholomew's Episocopal Church: $750,000 · OtherSt Bartholomew's Episocopal ChurchNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION INC: $170,000 · OtherNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION INCPartners with Children Inc: $150,000 · OtherPartners with Children IncMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: $125,000 · OtherMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterCure Alzheimer Fund: $120,000 · OtherCure Alzheimer FundIndividual grant recipient: $90,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+3 more: $72,500 · OtherTHE JED FOUNDATION: $180,000 · HealthTHE JED FOUNDATIONBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $170,000 · HealthBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATIONST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $160,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSP…ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $120,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERIC…THE SOUTHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOME: $70,000 · HealthTHE SOUTHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOMEFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN- NEW YORK: $180,000 · Crime & LegalPURSUIT TRANSFORMATION COMPANY INC: $60,000 · Education
Other$1,477,500Health$700,000Crime & Legal$180,000Education$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION: $180,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN- NEW YORK: $180,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION INC: $170,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $170,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $160,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $120,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOME: $70,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetPURSUIT TRANSFORMATION COMPANY INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPARTNERSHIP WITH CHILDREN INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE JED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN- NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SOUTHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOME ↗
  • Who funds PURSUIT TRANSFORMATION COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP WITH CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA11.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization L&L Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from L&L Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to L&L Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to L&L Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on L&L’s filings →

    More from the funding graph