· Private foundation
KYOCERA AVX Components Foundation (fka AVX-Kyocera Foundation)
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of KYOCERA AVX Components Foundation (fka AVX-Kyocera Foundation)’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 33 grants below total $563,662 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $636,662 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $73,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k17 grants · $54k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $240k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $270k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Clemson University Foundation | $210,000 |
| American Heart Association | $60,000 |
| SC Governor's School for Science & Mathematics | $35,000 |
| Peace Center Concert Hall | $35,000 |
| Pertubuhan Rumah Kebajikan Seri Cahaya Pulau Pinang | $25,000 |
| Servants for Sight (GRV Office) | $25,000 |
| United Way of North Carolina | $20,000 |
| South Carolina Charities Inc | $20,000 |
| Uherske Hradiste Hospital | $10,000 |
| Brno University of Technology | $10,000 |
| Persatuan Kebajikan Orang Kurang Upaya ( OKU ) Al Bokhari Da Mar Laut | $10,000 |
| Petrklic Shelter for Single Mothers | $10,000 |
| March of Dimes- Greenville | $10,000 |
| United Way of Greenville County | $10,000 |
| University of Colorado Foundation | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — across the US and around the world.
Your US giving — 0% of grant dollars ($0). The 100% that went abroad ($2.9M) is mapped below.
Beyond the US — 100% of all-years giving ($2.9M)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
40 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CUCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION5× · 2021–2025 · $402k · revenue +5%
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc4× · 2021–2025 · $173k · revenue +33%
- PCPEACE CENTER FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $145k · revenue +138%
Funded once
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY SC INCone grant, 2022 · $85k · revenue +3%
- AAprobomberosone grant, 2023 · $30k
- PEPegasus-SC Equestrian Centerone grant, 2024 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
To promote and support the educational, medical, scientific, and research purposes of the medical university of south carolina "musc", and university medical associates of the medical university of south carolina "uma", including their…
Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clemson University Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Greenville Triumph Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds PEACE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CARING UNLIMITED ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY SC INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH CAROLINA CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD CANCER CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds A Child's Haven Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY EFFECT ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTH CAROLINA ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds GREENVILLE TRIUMPH FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ge Aerospace Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Scsymmes Foundation · Daniel-Mickel Foundation · The Jolley Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Yeargin Foundation · Charity Ball Board of Greenville · Charles Timmons Foundation · John I Smith Charities Inc · Scansource Charitable Foundation · Dabo's All in Team Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.