· Private foundation
Krzyzanowski Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k22 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RC SHRINE OUR LADY CZESTOCHOWA DIOCESE | $35,000 |
| KATOLICKI UNIVERSITY LUBELSKI | $10,000 |
| ROMAN CATHOLIC CENTER OF JOHN PAUL II KRAKOW | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| PONTIFICAL ECCLESIASTICAL ACADEMY | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| SAMUEL D COZEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| CURE SMA | $1,000 |
| POLISH AMERICAN SOCIAL SERVICES | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF PA LAW SCHOOL | $500 |
| ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION | $250 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $100 |
| TURNING POINT USA | $100 |
| CATHOLIC LEAGUE | $100 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
US giving: 77% of grant dollars ($169k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 23% that went abroad ($50k) is mapped below.
Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $340) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
Beyond the US: 23% of all-years giving ($50k)
3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.
32 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- CLCATH LEAGUE FOR RELIGIOUS & CIVIL RIGHTS5× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +65%
- TPTHE PUBLIC SCHOOL OF GERMANTOWN3× · 2021–2024 · $400 · revenue +26%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches4× · 2020–2023 · $240 · revenue +38%
Funded once
- FOFRIENDS OF JOHN PAUL II FOUNDATION OF PHILADELPHIA INCone grant, 2020 · $46k · revenue -69% · 76% of their budget
- CPCOLLEGIO POLACCO VATICAN ROMEone grant, 2024 · $5k
- ACAMERICAN COLLEGE OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF THE USone grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…
American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…
Airlines for america (a4a) vigorously advocates for america's airlines as models of safety, customer service, and environmental responsibility; and as the indispensable network that drives our nation's economy and global…
The american political science association ("apsa") supports excellence in scholarship and teaching and informed discourse about politics, policy, and civic participation. the association promotes a lively, diverse community of scholars,…
How this is measured
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIENDS OF JOHN PAUL II FOUNDATION OF PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
- Who funds CATH LEAGUE FOR RELIGIOUS & CIVIL RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES OF SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY DBA CURE SMA ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds THE PUBLIC SCHOOL OF GERMANTOWN ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL POLICE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Polish American Congress Charitable Foundation ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds THE 1492 SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POLICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Citizens United Foundation ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Krzyzanowski Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Krzyzanowski Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Krzyzanowski’s filings →