Skip to content
Kropid Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Kropid Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$25kHealth$13kHousing & Shelter$9kInternational$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kHuman Services$4kReligion$2kEducation$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
8
States reached
$309k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HCS Family Services$5,500
St Judes$1,000
Little Sisters of the Poor$1,000
Misericordia$900
Safe Haven$500
Our Lady of the Angels Mission$500
Healtnetwork$500
Mayo Clinic$500
St Isaac Jogues Church$500
Women Resource Medical Center Allyfe$500
Illinois Right to Life$500
Habitat for Humanity$500
MDA$500
Assistance League$500
Cancer Research$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%Saving Mothers: $3k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $750 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
NV
IN
OH
CT
CA
NE
MD
TN
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$45k · 16 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
26

Total granted

$45k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+5%

Still filing today

38%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HCS FAMILY SERVICES
    5× · 2021–2025 · $21k · revenue +9%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2021–2024 · $3k · revenue +27%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • DS
    DULUTH SUPERIOR AREA COMMUNITY FOUN
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • SM
    SAVING MOTHERSgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +81%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SO NV
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
3
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
Edward W Sparrow Hospital

Improving the health of the people in our communities by providing quality, compassionate care to everyone, every time.

Health
6
Washington Regional Medical Center

Washington regional is committed to improving the health of people in communities we serve through compassionate, high-quality care, prevention, and wellness education.

Health
7
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
8
Americares Foundation Inc

Americares mission is to help people and communities around the world access (see schedule o).

International
9
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
10
International Committee of the Red Cross

The international committee of the red cross (switzerland)(icrc) is an impartial, neutral, and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and of violence…

International
11
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
12
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DULUTH SUPERIOR AREA COMMUNITY FOUN: $5,000 · OtherDULUTH SUPERIOR AREA COMMUNITY FOUNLittle Sisters of the Poor: $3,500 · OtherLittle Sisters of the PoorST THERESE CENTER HIV OUTREACH: $2,500 · OtherST THERESE CENTER HIV OUTREACHCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SO NV: $2,200 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SO NVFIT FOUNDATION FOR AN INDEPENDENT T: $2,000 · OtherFIT FOUNDATION FOR AN INDEPENDENT TCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $2,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESAssistance League: $1,700 · OtherMisericordia: $1,500 · OtherSt Isaac Jogues Church: $1,500 · OtherHabitat for Humanity: $1,250 · Other+25 more: $14,150 · Other+25 moreHCS FAMILY SERVICES: $21,360 · Community ImprovementHCS FAMILY SERVICESSAVING MOTHERS: $3,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,750 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $2,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $300 · InternationalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,650 · HealthWOMENS RESOURCE MEDICAL CENTERS: $500 · HealthMAYO CLINIC: $500 · HealthDISCOVERY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $1,000 · Arts & CultureWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $100 · Arts & CultureGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $600 · PhilanthropyHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER: $100 · Animals
Other$37,300Community Improvement$21,360Human Services$5,750International$4,300Health$2,650Arts & Culture$1,100Philanthropy$600Animals$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHCS FAMILY SERVICES: $21,360 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSAVING MOTHERS: $3,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR POSITIVELY KIDS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDISCOVERY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEdward Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENS RESOURCE MEDICAL CENTERS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HCS FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SAVING MOTHERS ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR POSITIVELY KIDS ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVERY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Edward Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS RESOURCE MEDICAL CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kropid Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kropid Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kropid Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home