Skip to content
KrohaCasner Family Foundation Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

KrohaCasner Family Foundation Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$362k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$2.1MFood & Nutrition$682kYouth Development$240kArts & Culture$97kHealth$88kCrime & Legal$70kAnimals$60kCommunity Improvement$58kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
  • $250k+8 grants · $2.7M
$5,076
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Raymond James Charitable fbo Bryce$362,177
Fidelity Giving Acct FBO Scott Sara$359,232
Fidelity Giving Acct FBO Kroha Bean$359,232
American Endow Found fbo Kroha Fami$358,052
American Endow Found fbo Kroha Fami$323,600
Fidelity Giving Acct FBO Kroha Bean$321,512
Fidelity Giving Acct FBO Scott Sara$321,512
Raymond James Charitable fbo Bryce$320,157
San Diego Social Venture Partners$20,000
Just in Time for Foster Youth$15,000
American Brain Foundation$13,354
KidsFirst at Sunset View$5,076
Transgender Law Center$5,000
Los Angeles LGBT Center$5,000
LACMA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Selah Neighborhood Homeless Coaliti: $4k → 14%Selah Neighborhood Homeless Coaliti: $2k → 14%Selah Neighborhood Homeless Coaliti: $1k → 14%Safe Place for Youth: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
OH
CA
MD
TN
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

19%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$696k · 34 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +92% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
23

Total granted

$696k
$126k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+92%
+10%

Still filing today

53%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEnvironmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JI
    JUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH
    7× · 2017–2024 · $127k · revenue +209%
  • VF
    VOICES FOR CHILDREN
    3× · 2017–2019 · $50k · revenue +44%
  • PH
    PASADENA HUMANE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $40k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • PH
    Pasadena Humane Society SPCA
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • LB
    LONG BEACH BOY SCOUT COUNCIL
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • JI
    JUST IN TIME
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Life Sciences Association

Clsa advances californias world-leading life sciences innovation ecosystem by advocating for effective national, state and local public policies and supporting entrepreneurs and life sciences businesses.

Community Improvement
2
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
3
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
4
Active San Gabriel Valley

Active San Gabriel Valley (ActiveSGV) is a community-based environmental advocacy and public health non-profit organization. Our mission is to promote a more sustainable, equitable, and livable San Gabriel Valley.

Community Improvement
5
Los Padres Forestwatch Inc

Los padres forestwatch protects the los padres national forest and the carrizo plain national monument through education, advocacy, and when necessary, legal action for the benefit of our communities, climate and future generations.

Environment
6
Policy & Innovation Center

The policy & innovation center's (pic) mission is to unlock the region's potential by cultivating and building partnerships. our niche is to address intractable issues that can only be solved with cross-sector, multi-jurisdictional…

Philanthropy
7
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
8
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
9
California Coastkeeper dba California Coastkeeper Alliance

California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.

Environment
10
San Diego County Bar Association

The mission of the san diego county bar association is to be the representative of the san diego county legal profession, serving the prblic and the profession by enhancing the legal system and promoting justice, professional excellence,…

—
11
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
12
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Natural Resources Defense Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
30/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Raymond James Charitable fbo Bryce: $682,334 · OtherRaymond James Charitable fbo BryceAmerican Endow Found fbo Kroha Fami: $681,652 · OtherAmerican Endow Found fbo Kroha FamiFidelity Giving Acct FBO Kroha Bean: $680,744 · OtherFidelity Giving Acct FBO Kroha BeanFidelity Giving Acct FBO Scott Sara: $680,744 · OtherFidelity Giving Acct FBO Scott Sara+47 more: $511,036 · Other+47 moreJUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH: $127,000 · Youth DevelopmentVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $50,000 · Civil RightsTransgender Law Center: $24,000 · Civil RightsKaren Organization of San Diego: $26,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $17,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $2,500 · Arts & CultureALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $18,000 · HealthAMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION: $13,354 · HealthALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES: $5,000 · HealthTranslifeline DBA Trans Lifeline: $4,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $2,076 · HealthPASADENA HUMANE: $40,000 · AnimalsUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $15,000 · EducationDiamond Educational Excellence Partnership: $13,000 · EducationSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $8,000 · EducationBARRIO LOGAN COLLEGE INSTITUTE: $4,000 · Education
Other$3,236,510Youth Development$127,000Civil Rights$74,000Arts & Culture$46,000Health$42,430Animals$40,000Education$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH: $127,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $50,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPASADENA HUMANE: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMPLIFIED IMPACT PARTNERS fka SAN DIEGO SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS: $28,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetKaren Organization of San Diego: $26,000 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $24,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTransgender Law Center: $24,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO COASTKEEPER: $22,500 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $17,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $13,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION: $13,354 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDiamond Educational Excellence Partnership: $13,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetKIDS FIRST AT SUNSET VIEW: $9,076 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANZA-BORREGO FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSELAH NEIGHBORHOOD HOMELESS COALITION: $6,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetDREAMS FOR CHANGE INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCasa Cornelia Legal Services: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget350ORG: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTranslifeline DBA Trans Lifeline: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetArts Business Collaborative: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLIMATE RESOLVE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBARRIO LOGAN COLLEGE INSTITUTE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $2,076 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOINT LOMA ASSOCIATION %BRAD NELSON: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetINDEGO AFRICA PROJECT: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLAGUNA DANCE FESTIVAL: $1,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP SHELTER INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds PASADENA HUMANE ↗
  • Who funds AMPLIFIED IMPACT PARTNERS fka SAN DIEGO SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds Karen Organization of San Diego ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Transgender Law Center ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO COASTKEEPER ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Diamond Educational Excellence Partnership ↗
  • Who funds KIDS FIRST AT SUNSET VIEW ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANZA-BORREGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SELAH NEIGHBORHOOD HOMELESS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds DREAMS FOR CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Casa Cornelia Legal Services ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego Foundat…Sempra FoundationCalifornia Community …Jewish Community Foun…The Parker FoundationPrice Philanthropies …The Conrad Prebys Fou…The James Irvine Foun…Rancho Santa Fe Found…ImpactassetsincTides FoundationThe Ayco Charitable F…
The San Diego FoundationCA20.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Sempra Foundation · California Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The Parker Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Tides Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization KrohaCasner Family Foundation Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from KrohaCasner Family Foundation Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on KrohaCasner Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home