Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kristin-Kendrick Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$57kFood & Nutrition$43kHousing & Shelter$16kHealth$7kAnimals$3kYouth Development$1kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$274k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAINTS PANTRY FOOD BANK$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
WHITE CENTER FOOD BANK$4,000
HOSPITALITY HOUSE$2,000
TIDES OF CHANGE$2,000
KITTEN RESCUE OF MASON COUNTY$2,000
HOPE ALLIANCE$1,500
SUPPORT CENTER$1,000
VANESSA BEHAN CRISIS NURSERY$1,000
FAILSAFE FOR LIFE$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%QUILCEDA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 9%The Answer for Youth: $1k → 12%SUPPORT CENTER: $1k → 17%SUPPORT CENTER: $1k → 17%SUPPORT CENTER: $1k → 17%SUPPORT CENTER: $1k → 17%SUPPORT CENTER: $1k → 17%SUPPORT CENTER: $1k → 17%SUPPORT CENTER: $1k → 17%SUPPORT CENTER: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$146k · 10 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
5

Total granted

$146k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+183%

Still filing today

90%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SAINT'S PANTRY FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue ×12
  • TO
    TIDES OF CHANGE FKA TILLAMOOK CO WOMEN'S RESOURCE C
    9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +16%
  • WC
    WHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CENTER FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +344%

Funded once

  • TP
    TURNING POINTE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICE
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • D
    DVSAS
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • QC
    QUILCEDA COMMUNITY SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +183%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Womens Crisis Center of Taney County Inc

The Crisis Center provides shelter and services to victims and their children of domestic and sexual violence.

Human Services
2
Kodiak Womens Resource and Cri Center

Provide support services to persons in crisis as a result of domestic violence or sexual assault. Maintain a shelter building.

Human Services
3
Family Crisis Center

Promote safety, self-sufficiency, hope and healing to those effected by abuse.

Health
4
Transitions

Transitions works to end poverty and homelessness for women and children in Spokane, Washington.

Human Services
5
Skagit Valley Hospitality House Association

To reflect the heart of God by feeding, sheltering, clothing, healing and empowering those in need. Programs include housing, a cafe and job training system, shelter resources, and more. Our core values are: compassion, respect, joy and…

Housing & Shelter
6
Queen Anne Helpline

Queen Anne Helpline prevents homelessness and bolsters access to the foundational resources we all need to thrive.

7
Emergency Support Shelter

Our mission is to end sexual and domestic violence while providing education, safety and support to our community.

Human Services
8
Tenino Community Service Center

Tenino Community Service Center/Tenino Food Bank Plus is a deep-rooted community-based service center dedicated to feeding those within the Tenino school district (Tenino and Bucoda) that may be disadvantaged. In addition, it is our…

Food & Nutrition
9
Family Crisis Shelter Inc

Emergency shelter for victims of domestic abuse and supportive services to all victims of abuse

Human Services
10
SafeQuest Solano Inc

SafeQuest Solano is dedicated to providing prevention education, advo cacy, and intervention services to those affected by domestic violence and sexual assault.

11
Hope Crisis Center

Hope crisis center provides crisis line services and shelter to domestic violence and sexual assault victims

Health
12
Vera House Inc

Vera house, inc. prevents, responds to and partners to end domestic and sexual violence and other forms of abuse.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Support Center and the most unlike its peers is Kitten Rescue of Mason County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $24,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTIDES OF CHANGE FKA TILLAMOOK CO WOMEN'S RESOURCE C — $22,500 · OtherTIDES OF CHANGE FKA TILLAMOOK CO WOMEN'S RESOURCE CWHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CENTER FOOD BANK — $18,000 · OtherWHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CENTER FOOD B…Hope Alliance Public Benefit Non-Profit Corporation — $12,000 · OtherHope Alliance Public Benefit Non-Profit Corporation+3 more — $3,000 · OtherTHE SAINT'S PANTRY FOOD BANK — $25,000 · Food & NutritionTHE SAINT'S PANTRY…Hospitality House — $16,000 · Housing & ShelterHospitality …THE SUPPORT CENTER — $8,000 · Human ServicesTHE SUPPORT…FAILSAFE FOR LIFE — $5,500 · Human ServicesFAILSAFE FO…QUILCEDA COMMUNITY SERVICES — $1,000 · Human ServicesQUILCEDA CO…ANSWER FOR YOUTH — $1,000 · Human ServicesANSWER FOR …VANESSA BEHAN — $12,000 · Crime & LegalVANESSA B…KITTEN RESCUE OF MASON COUNTY — $3,000 · Animals
Other$79,500Food & Nutrition$25,000Housing & Shelter$16,000Human Services$15,500Crime & Legal$12,000Animals$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SAINT'S PANTRY FOOD BANK — $25,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetTIDES OF CHANGE FKA TILLAMOOK CO WOMEN'S RESOURCE C — $22,500 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetWHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CENTER FOOD BANK — $18,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHospitality House — $16,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetVANESSA BEHAN — $12,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHope Alliance Public Benefit Non-Profit Corporation — $12,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SUPPORT CENTER — $8,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetFAILSAFE FOR LIFE — $5,500 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetKITTEN RESCUE OF MASON COUNTY — $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetQUILCEDA COMMUNITY SERVICES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANSWER FOR YOUTH — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SAINT'S PANTRY FOOD BANK
  • Who funds TIDES OF CHANGE FKA TILLAMOOK CO WOMEN'S RESOURCE C
  • Who funds WHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CENTER FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Hospitality House
  • Who funds VANESSA BEHAN
  • Who funds Hope Alliance Public Benefit Non-Profit Corporation
  • Who funds THE SUPPORT CENTER
  • Who funds FAILSAFE FOR LIFE
  • Who funds KITTEN RESCUE OF MASON COUNTY
  • Who funds QUILCEDA COMMUNITY SERVICES
  • Who funds ANSWER FOR YOUTH

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kristin-Kendrick Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 31%
  • Tides of Change Fka Tillamook Co Women's Resource C31% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kristin-Kendrick Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Kristin-Kendrick Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph