Skip to content
Krietzburg Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Krietzburg Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$8kPhilanthropy$6kRecreation & Sports$6kInternational$5kFood & Nutrition$5kHuman Services$3kCommunity Improvement$2kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
3
States reached
$44k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$1,500
ZAKA NORTH INC$250
Individual grant recipient$160
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%MORGAN'S INCLUSION INITIATIVE: $1k → 16%MORGAN'S INCLUSION INITIATIVE: $500 → 16%DISABILITY SA: $500 → 16%BCFS: $1k → 16%PROJECT ANGEL FARES: $750 → 16%MORGAN'S WONDERLAND CAMP: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$27k · 8 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
11

Total granted

$27k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+83%

Still filing today

50%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyFood & NutritionArts & CultureEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    ALPHA HOME INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $8k · revenue -48%
  • CE
    CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY RELIEF INTERNATIONAL
    3× · 2021–2023 · $5k · revenue +109%
  • IS
    IMPACT SAN ANTONIO FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $5k · revenue -2%

Funded once

  • MC
    MORGAN'S CAMP FKA MORGAN'S WONDERLAND CAMP
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +12%
  • MT
    MEATING THE NEED
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +4%
  • FF
    FirstDay Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Morgan's Wonderland

Morgan's wonderland owns, manages and maintains the special needs park in san antonio, texas. it has over 25 acres dedicated to outdoor recreation for people with mental and physical disabilities (see schedule o)

Recreation & Sports
2
Connectability

ConnectAbility's mission is to empower those with life altering disabilities and their caregivers to reach their fullest potential.

Human Services
3
The National Association of State Workforce Agencies

The national association of state workforce agencies (naswa) mission is to enhance the state workforce agencies' ability to accomplish their goals, statutory roles and responsibilities.

—
4
Greater Satx

The mission of greater:satx is to lead the developemnt and diversification of san antonio regional economy through the recruitment and expansion of qualify employers and job producing investments.

—
5
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
6
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
7
San Antonio Medical Foundation

The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.

Health
8
Qm Quality Matters Inc

To promote and improve the quality of online education and student learning through: 1. development of research-supported, best (continued on schedule o) practice-based quality standards and appropriate evaluation tools and procedures. 2.…

Education
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
10
Opportunity Partners

Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…

Employment
11
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
12
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is FirstDay Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Wimberley Valley Art League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALPHA HOME INC: $7,500 · OtherALPHA HOME INCIndividual grant recipient: $3,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOCIAL VENTURES PARTNERS SA: $2,200 · OtherSOCIAL VENTURES PARTNERS SAIndividual grant recipient: $1,210 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $1,000 · Other+4 more: $1,750 · Other+4 moreMORGAN'S CAMP FKA MORGAN'S WONDERLAND CAMP: $5,000 · Human ServicesMORGAN'S CAMP FKA MORGA…Morgan's Inclusion Initiative FKA Morgan's Wonderland Inclusion Foundation: $1,500 · Human ServicesMorgan's Inclusion Init…FirstDay Foundation: $1,300 · Human ServicesFirstDay FoundationCompass Connections: $750 · Human ServicesCompass ConnectionsDISABILITYSA dba FIESTA ESPECIAL DISABILITYSA CREATIVE SERVICES: $500 · Human ServicesDISABILITYSA dba FIESTA…CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY RELIEF INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 · InternationalCHILDREN'S E…IMPACT SAN ANTONIO FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 · PhilanthropyIMPACT SAN …MEATING THE NEED: $4,500 · Food & NutritionMEATING THE…WIMBERLEY VALLEY ART LEAGUE: $1,000 · Arts & CulturePROJECT QUEST INC: $1,000 · Employment
Other$19,210Human Services$9,050International$5,000Philanthropy$4,500Food & Nutrition$4,500Arts & Culture$1,000Employment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALPHA HOME INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMORGAN'S CAMP FKA MORGAN'S WONDERLAND CAMP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S EMERGENCY RELIEF INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetIMPACT SAN ANTONIO FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMEATING THE NEED: $4,500 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetMorgan's Inclusion Initiative FKA Morgan's Wonderland Inclusion Foundation: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFirstDay Foundation: $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIMBERLEY VALLEY ART LEAGUE: $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPROJECT QUEST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCompass Connections: $750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetZAKA NORTH INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area Foun…Nancy Smith Hurd Foun…Enterprise Holdings F…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
San Antonio Area FoundationTX17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Krietzburg Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Krietzburg Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Krietzburg Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home