Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Krietzburg Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$8kPhilanthropy$6kRecreation & Sports$6kInternational$5kFood & Nutrition$5kHuman Services$3kCommunity Improvement$2kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$250
Median grant
3
States reached
$44k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$1,500
ZAKA NORTH INC$250
Individual grant recipient$160
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%MORGAN'S INCLUSION INITIATIVE: $1k → 16%MORGAN'S INCLUSION INITIATIVE: $500 → 16%DISABILITY SA: $500 → 16%BCFS: $1k → 16%PROJECT ANGEL FARES: $750 → 16%MORGAN'S WONDERLAND CAMP: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$27k · 8 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
11

Total granted

$27k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+83%

Still filing today

50%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalFood & NutritionPhilanthropyArts & CultureEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    ALPHA HOME INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $8k · revenue -48%
  • CE
    CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY RELIEF INTERNATIONAL
    3× · 2021–2023 · $5k · revenue +109%
  • IS
    IMPACT SAN ANTONIO FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $5k · revenue -2%

Funded once

  • MC
    MORGAN'S CAMP FKA MORGAN'S WONDERLAND CAMP
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +12%
  • MT
    MEATING THE NEED
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +5%
  • FF
    FirstDay Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue -3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Morgan's Wonderland

Morgan's wonderland owns, manages and maintains the special needs park in san antonio, texas. it has over 25 acres dedicated to outdoor recreation for people with mental and physical disabilities (see schedule o)

Recreation & Sports
2
Connectability

ConnectAbility's mission is to empower those with life altering disabilities and their caregivers to reach their fullest potential.

Human Services
3
The National Association of State Workforce Agencies

The national association of state workforce agencies (naswa) mission is to enhance the state workforce agencies' ability to accomplish their goals, statutory roles and responsibilities.

4
Greater Satx

The mission of greater:satx is to lead the developemnt and diversification of san antonio regional economy through the recruitment and expansion of qualify employers and job producing investments.

5
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
6
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
7
San Antonio Medical Foundation

The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.

Health
8
Qm Quality Matters Inc

To promote and improve the quality of online education and student learning through: 1. development of research-supported, best (continued on schedule o) practice-based quality standards and appropriate evaluation tools and procedures. 2.…

Education
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

10
Opportunity Partners

Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…

Employment
11
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
12
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is FirstDay Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Wimberley Valley Art League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALPHA HOME INC — $7,500 · OtherALPHA HOME INCIndividual grant recipient — $3,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOCIAL VENTURES PARTNERS SA — $2,200 · OtherSOCIAL VENTURES PARTNERS SAIndividual grant recipient — $1,210 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $1,000 · Other+4 more — $1,750 · Other+4 moreMORGAN'S CAMP FKA MORGAN'S WONDERLAND CAMP — $5,000 · Human ServicesMORGAN'S CAMP FKA MORGA…Morgan's Inclusion Initiative FKA Morgan's Wonderland Inclusion Foundation — $1,500 · Human ServicesMorgan's Inclusion Init…FirstDay Foundation — $1,300 · Human ServicesFirstDay FoundationCompass Connections — $750 · Human ServicesCompass ConnectionsDISABILITYSA dba FIESTA ESPECIAL DISABILITYSA CREATIVE SERVICES — $500 · Human ServicesDISABILITYSA dba FIESTA…CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY RELIEF INTERNATIONAL — $5,000 · InternationalCHILDREN'S E…MEATING THE NEED — $4,500 · Food & NutritionMEATING THE…IMPACT SAN ANTONIO FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 · PhilanthropyIMPACT SAN …WIMBERLEY VALLEY ART LEAGUE — $1,000 · Arts & CulturePROJECT QUEST INC — $1,000 · Employment
Other$19,210Human Services$9,050International$5,000Food & Nutrition$4,500Philanthropy$4,500Arts & Culture$1,000Employment$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetALPHA HOME INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S EMERGENCY RELIEF INTERNATIONAL — $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMORGAN'S CAMP FKA MORGAN'S WONDERLAND CAMP — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMEATING THE NEED — $4,500 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetIMPACT SAN ANTONIO FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMorgan's Inclusion Initiative FKA Morgan's Wonderland Inclusion Foundation — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFirstDay Foundation — $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIMBERLEY VALLEY ART LEAGUE — $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPROJECT QUEST INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCompass Connections — $750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetZAKA NORTH INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Krietzburg Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph