Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kretz Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$73kHuman Services$20kFood & Nutrition$16kEducation$14kHousing & Shelter$8kInternational$3kScience & Tech$2kYouth Development$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$762k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK$2,500
VILLAGE PROJECT$2,500
OUR LADY OF THE WAYSIDE$2,500
HENRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK$1,000
VICTORY TEMPLE SOUP KITCHEN$1,000
GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN & FAMILY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
BOOKS FOR COLLIER KIDS$1,000
YOUTH HAVEN$1,000
MALACHI HOUSE$1,000
ST MATTHEWS HOUSE$1,000
BLESSING HOUSE$1,000
FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%BLESSING HOUSE: $1k → 13%BLESSING HOUSE: $1k → 13%BLESSING HOUSE: $1k → 13%FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY: $1k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN: $1k → 10%BLESSING HOUSE: $2k → 17%NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR HOMELE: $2k → 17%NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR HOMELE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Kretz Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 84%.

Kretz Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$99k · 17 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
22

Total granted

$99k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+77%

Still filing today

59%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OL
    OUR LADY OF THE WAYSIDE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +46%
  • AC
    ACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN
    3× · 2017–2021 · $12k · revenue +57%
  • GC
    GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $21k
  • CC
    CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • SR
    STRONGSVILLE ROTARY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope for Cleveland's Children
—
2
West Side Catholic Center

The west side catholic center provides food, clothing, shelter, and advocacy to all who come to us in need. through various programs, we serve the homeless and indigent of cleveland, ohio.

Human Services
3
Central Community House

Central community house (cch) is a comprehensive, neighborhood-based community center that has been serving the near east and south side neighborhoods of columbus, ohio since 1936. rather than specifically address one problem or social…

—
4
Saint Lukes Foundation of Cleveland Ohio
Health
5
Choices for Victims of Domestic Violence

To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…

Human Services
6
Care Alliance

To transform lives by providing exceptional, accessible, and compassionate healthcare experiences for all.

Human Services
7
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Greater Cincinnati Inc

Providing essential services that remove barriers, strengthens families, and promotes healing when children need healthcare.

Human Services
8
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
9
Community of Hope

To build lasting relationships, nurture hope, and restore dignity by creating family-like relationships for cleveland's youth. we connect young adults & young families to groups of committed volunteers from the community, using a national…

Youth Development
10
Project Hope of Cleveland Inc

To provide a temporary health care safety net for individuals in need while educating and empowering them to manage their own health, always respecting the dignity of each person we serve. financial support is offered for medications, bus…

Health
11
Covenant House Michigan

Covenant house michigan is a sanctuary for homeless and at-risk young people, ages 18-24 who have nowhere to go. it is our mission to serve these children with respect and love.covenant house michigan builds bridges to hope for young…

Human Services
12
Providence House Inc

Mission: providence house protects at-risk children and supports families through crisis, strengthening communities to end child abuse and neglect.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Urban Community School; the most unlike its peers is The Kyle Jean-Baptiste Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
17/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OUR LADY OF THE WAYSIDE INC: $24,365 · OtherOUR LADY OF THE WAYSIDE INCIndividual grant recipient: $21,412 · OtherIndividual grant recipientACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN: $12,000 · OtherACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDRENST HERMANS HOUSE - FOCUS CLEVELAND: $9,500 · OtherST HERMANS HOUSE - FOCUS CLEVELANDCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $7,500 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION+30 more: $41,427 · Other+30 moreGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CLE…VILLAGE PROJECT: $5,500 · Food & NutritionVILLAGE PRO…BLESSING HOUSE: $5,000 · Human ServicesNORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $3,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH HAVEN INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesFun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesBOOKS FOR COLLIER KIDS INC: $8,000 · EducationTHE METANOIA PROJECT: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterSTRONGSVILLE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Community ImprovementCAMP GOOD DAYS AND SPECIAL TIMES INC: $1,549 · Recreation & Sports
Other$116,204Food & Nutrition$15,500Human Services$10,000Education$8,000Housing & Shelter$3,000Community Improvement$2,500Recreation & Sports$1,549

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOUR LADY OF THE WAYSIDE INC: $24,365 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN: $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBOOKS FOR COLLIER KIDS INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetVILLAGE PROJECT: $5,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBLESSING HOUSE: $5,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTRONGSVILLE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE METANOIA PROJECT: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMALACHI HOUSE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP GOOD DAYS AND SPECIAL TIMES INC: $1,549 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetURBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH HAVEN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS CLEVELAND WEST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOH-GO: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE KYLE JEAN-BAPTISTE FOUNDATION INC: $227 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OUR LADY OF THE WAYSIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds BOOKS FOR COLLIER KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds BLESSING HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
  • Who funds STRONGSVILLE ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE METANOIA PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds MALACHI HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP GOOD DAYS AND SPECIAL TIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds URBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS CLEVELAND WEST ↗
  • Who funds Fun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH21× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · Community West Foundation · Akron Community Foundation · Citizens Charitable Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kretz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kretz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kretz Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph