Skip to content
Kpg Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Kpg Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$105kYouth Development$17kEducation$9kHousing & Shelter$5kHealth$2k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$389k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STARRY INC$10,000
COLLIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION$9,000
COMPUTERS FOR THE BLIND$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CITY HOUSE: $10k → 5%Angel Reach: $5k → 9%LifeWorks Austin: $3k → 10%City House: $10k → 5%Angel Reach: $5k → 9%Clothed By Faith Inc: $5k → 16%CITY HOUSE: $8k → 5%City House: $5k → 5%Clothed By Faith Inc: $3k → 16%City House: $5k → 5%CITY HOUSE: $2k → 5%Tony's Place: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 73% of Kpg Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Kpg Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$95k · 4 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$95k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+37%

Still filing today

100%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CITY HOUSE INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $40k · revenue +23%
  • SI
    STARRY Inc
    5× · 2019–2024 · $38k · revenue +48%
  • AR
    ANGEL REACH
    2× · 2019–2021 · $10k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • HC
    HAY Center Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +20%
  • TC
    Twin City Mission
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +16%
  • HR
    HOUSTON REVISIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +81%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Youth Crisis Center Inc

The mission of YCC is to build a healthier community by empowering young people and families to rise above adversity.

Human Services
2
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
3
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
4
Covenant House Texas

Covenant house texas shelters, protects, and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, and sexually exploited youth.

Human Services
5
Youth and Family Crossroads

Transitional and Outreach services to homeless, care for families in crisis

Religion
6
Atx Helps

ATX Helps was created to fill gaps in the spectrum of services available to people in Austin who are experiencing homelessness.

Human Services
7
Youth Center of Texas Inc

Youth center of texas, inc mission is to provide the holistic support needed to restore each survivor's (female identifying survivors of child sex trafficking and commercial exploitation, ages 18-22 and their babies) growth into a life…

—
8
Shelter Agencies for Families in East Texas

To provide shelter to abused families.

Human Services
9
Teen and Family Services Austin

Teen and Family Services Austin provides counseling and education on an individual as well as group basis to provide support to parents and teens who are coping with teen high risk behavior.

—
10
Homeless Youth Alliance

The Organization's mission is to meet youth experiencing homelessness where they are, see them all as individuals with unique experiences and life stories and help them to build healthier lives. The Organization believes reducing harm is…

Youth Development
11
Ft Bend County Child Advocates Inc

Fort Bend County Child Advocates, Inc. provides a voice, heals the hurt and breaks the cycle of abuse and neglect for children in Fort Bend County.

Civil Rights
12
Payne County Youth Services Inc

Payne County Youth Services, Inc. is dedicated to providing free quality services for the positive development and recovery of children, youth, and families.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Computers for the Blind. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY HOUSE INC: $39,576 · Human ServicesCITY HOUSE INCANGEL REACH: $10,000 · Human ServicesANGEL REACHCLOTHED BY FAITH INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesCLOTHED BY FAITH INCTony's Place: $2,500 · Human ServicesYOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE: $2,500 · Human ServicesSTARRY Inc: $37,500 · Community ImprovementSTARRY IncCOLLIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $9,000 · OtherCOLLIN COLLEGE FOUNDA…Twin City Mission: $2,500 · OtherTwin City MissionLifeworks: $2,500 · OtherLifeworksHarris County Protective Services for Children and Adults: $2,500 · OtherHarris County Protect…UPBRING: $2,500 · OtherUPBRINGTHE SAFE ALLIANCE: $2,500 · OtherTHE SAFE ALLIANCEBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF COLLIN COUNTY INC: $2,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF…COMPUTERS FOR THE BLIND: $2,000 · OtherCOMPUTERS FOR THE BLI…HAY Center Foundation: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOUSTON REVISION: $2,500 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$62,076Community Improvement$37,500Other$25,500Youth Development$10,000Crime & Legal$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCITY HOUSE INC: $39,576 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSTARRY Inc: $37,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHAY Center Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetANGEL REACH: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCLOTHED BY FAITH INC: $7,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTwin City Mission: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSTON REVISION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTony's Place: $2,500 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetYOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF COLLIN COUNTY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMPUTERS FOR THE BLIND: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company Fou…Greater Houston Commu…Texas Instruments Fou…Texas Center for Chil…Baker Hughes Foundati…The Blackbaud Giving …United Way WorldwideEnterprise Holdings F…Natl Christian Charit…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…
Shell USA Company FoundationTX16.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Texas Center for Child and Family Studies · Baker Hughes Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · United Way Worldwide · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kpg Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kpg Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kpg Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home