· Private foundation
Korndrop Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MALARIA CONSORTIUM US | $25,000 |
| HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| ASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC | $10,000 |
| ALASKA ZOO | $10,000 |
| HEALTH VOLUNTEERS OVERSEAS | $10,000 |
| ALASKA PUBLIC MEDIA INC | $7,500 |
| THE ALASKA CENTER EDUCATION FUND | $5,000 |
| FRIENDS OF FOOTHILLS ANIMAL SHELTER | $5,000 |
| RENEWABLE ENERGY ALASKA PROJECT | $5,000 |
| ALASKA SPORTS HALL OF FAME INC | $5,000 |
| MAUI HUMANE SOCIETY INC | $2,500 |
| FRIENDS OF CHUGACH NATIONAL FOREST AVALANCHE INFOR | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC3× · 2021–2024 · $75k · revenue +85%
- TATHE ALASKA CENTER EDUCATION FUND4× · 2021–2024 · $30k · revenue +6%
- MHMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY2× · 2023–2024 · $28k · revenue +79%
Funded once
- SASingletrack Advocatesgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +36%
- YEYouth Exploring Adventure Incone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +19%
- NSNordic Skiing Association of Anchoragegraduatedone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +39%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Promote and encourage cooperation among Alaska electric utilities and their customers while promoting the operation of electrical plants adequate for the needs of Alaskan consumers.
to promote, support and advocate for Alaska agriculture
The alaska museum of science and nature is dedicated to the education and exploration of our scientific and natural world.
The blood bank provides blood products and testing services to hospitals to ensure an adequate and safe supply of blood in routine and emergency situations. it provides educational services to potential donors and recipients of blood…
Enhance wild sheep populations, promote scientific wildlife management, educate the public on sheep and enhance sheep hunting and view opportunities in alaska.
The Alaska Hospital & Healthcare Association (AHHA) is a non-profit trade association representing more than 65 hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, home health agencies, and other healthcare partners.Our members are distributed across…
Alaska Whale Foundation is dedicated to marine mammal conservation through research monitoring and education.
Building partnerships, building trails. Working to build trails across the state and build capacity for trail organizations.
Protects alaska's unique landscapes and ways of life by supporting conservation leaders, organizations, and initiatives.
The alaska sealife center generates and shares scientific knowledge to promote understanding and stewardship of alaska's marine ecosystems.
Dedicated to strengthening the multi-disciplinary response to child abuse. We strive to ensure that professionals throughout Alaska are equipped to do the best job possible at holding offenders accountable and helping children and families…
The mission of the Alaska Avalanche School is to provide exceptional experience-based avalanche safety education to all users of the mountain environment.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Renewable Energy Alaska Project and the most unlike its peers is Singletrack Advocates. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ALASKA CENTER EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds MAUI HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds RENEWABLE ENERGY ALASKA PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ALASKA SPORTS HALL OF FAME INC ↗
- Who funds ALASKA PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds ALASKA ZOO ↗
- Who funds Singletrack Advocates ↗
- Who funds HEALTH VOLUNTEERS OVERSEAS INC ↗
- Who funds Youth Exploring Adventure Inc ↗
- Who funds ASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of Foothills Animal Shelter ↗
- Who funds Nordic Skiing Association of Anchorage ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rasmuson Foundation · The Alaska Community Foundation · Atwood Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Korndrop Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.