Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kohn Family Corporation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2026still arriving
13
Grants FY2026still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Arts & Culture$64kReligion$37kEducation$20kAnimals$20kHealth$13kEnvironment$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2026 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k11 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$179k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LA PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION$10,000
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FSO FLAG SERVICE ORG$10,000
SOUTHERN COUNTIES RESCUE INC$8,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
CATS AT THE STUDIOS INC$2,000
DENVER DACHSHOUND RESCUE & TRANSPORT$2,000
US INTERNATIONAL ASSOC SCIENTOLOGY$1,000
THE DELPHIAN SCHOOL$1,000
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY PORTLAND$1,000
MCMINNVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$500
GALLERY THEATRE$500
THE ORTHMAN FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SOUTHERN COUNTIES RESCUE INC: $8k → 11%RESCUES ROCK: $3k → 14%BRAIN & BEHAVIOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FSO FLAG SERVICE ORG: $10k → 12%STORY BOOK HILL PARK & ZOO: $8k → 11%THE DELPHIAN SCHOOL: $8k → 11%CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY PORTLAND: $1k → 12%THE SAIGI ESOPHAGEAL CANCER FTDN: $2k → 7%COLORADO PUPPY RESCUE: $5k → 8%DENVER DACHSHOUND RESCUE & TRANSPORT: $2k → 9%DENVER SISTER CITIES: $6k → 12%NEW HAMPSHIRE MUSIC FESTIVAL: $1k → 10%RESCUES ROCK: $3k → 14%THE FIELD: $8k → 17%ST PATRICK'S WEDNESDAY NIGHT MEAL PROGRAM: $3k → 11%THE DELPHIAN SCHOOL: $8k → 11%COLORADO PUPPY RESCUE: $4k → 8%DENVER SISTER CITIES: $5k → 12%WE ARE LAUREL CANYON: $3k → 14%THE FIELD: $5k → 17%THE DELPHIAN SCHOOL: $2k → 11%COLORADO PUPPY RESCUE: $3k → 8%DENVER SISTER CITIES: $5k → 12%WE ARE LAUREL CANYON: $2k → 14%THE FIELD: $5k → 17%THE DELPHIAN SCHOOL: $2k → 11%GWEN & FRIENDS: $3k → 12%WE ARE LAUREL CANYON: $1k → 14%TEAM FOR KIDS: $6k → 17%THE DELPHIAN SCHOOL: $1k → 11%YOUTH FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 14%SMILE TRAIN INC: $3k → 17%KIDS ON THE BLOCK: $1k → 11%WE ARE LAUREL CANYON: $1k → 14%LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC: $30k → 14%LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $15k → 14%BAGS INTO BEDS: $5k → 14%LA PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $10k → 14%MENTAL HEALTH ADVOCACY SERVICES: $3k → 14%MENTAL HEALTH ADVOCACY SERVICES: $3k → 14%THE EARTH ORGANIZATION: $3k → 14%THE EARTH ORGANIZATION: $2k → 14%US INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCIENTOLOGY: $13k → 14%US INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCIENTOLOGY: $4k → 14%US INTL ASSOC OF SCIENTOLOGY: $4k → 14%US INTL ASSOC OF SCIENTOLOGY: $3k → 14%US INTERNATIONAL ASSOC SCIENTOLOGY: $1k → 14%CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST: $13k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$157k · 11 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +166% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2026, 9 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
11

Total granted

$157k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+166%
+24%

Still filing today

45%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’26
AnimalsArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2017–2019 · $45k · revenue +28%
  • TP
    THE PERFORMANCE ZONE INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $18k · revenue +166%
  • CP
    COLORADO PUPPY RESCUE OF COLORADO
    3× · 2017–2020 · $12k · revenue +193%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
  • SB
    STORY BOOK HILL PARK & ZOO
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
  • BI
    Bags Into Beds
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Realtors to the Rescue

Animal Rescue

—
2
Safe Haven Inc
Animals
3
Mineral County Humane Society Inc

rescue-spay-neuter and adopt into forever homes

Animals
4
Jet Wag Animal Rescue Inc

Our mission is to move adoptable dogs and cats primarily from heavily-burdened areas to loving homes. We work with trusted partners throughout the country and around the world and facilitate vet care, transport, and adoptions to help…

Animals
5
Muttsnstuff

Rescue animals

Animals
6
Mountain View Animal Rescue

Rescue of abused or abandoned animals

Animals
7
Denver Kittens

Denver Kittens focuses on providing free and low cost spay and neuter services. trap neuter return services, and rescue for social cats and kittens in order to reduce the feral cat population and make spay and neuter services more…

Animals
8
Their Lives Matter

Dog rescue and care nurturing finding a home

Animals
9
Good Dog Rescue

To save dogs from high kill shelters and place them into loving foster homes. Prior to adoption our dogs will be vetted, spayed or neutered and nurtured to join a supportive and loving home environment.

Animals
10
St Clouds Rescue
Animals
11
PurrHarmony Inc

Rescue and shelter cats

Animals
12
Where the Wild Things Are Rescue in

The rescue and rehabilitation of canines.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Dachshunds Rescue and Transport; the most unlike its peers is Cats At the Studios Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

US INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCIENTOLOGY: $24,000 · OtherUS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCIENTOLOGYTHE DELPHIAN SCHOOL: $20,700 · OtherTHE DELPHIAN SCHOOLTHE PERFORMANCE ZONE INC: $18,000 · OtherTHE PERFORMANCE ZONE INCIndividual grant recipient: $15,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST: $13,000 · OtherCHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUSTLA PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · OtherLA PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATIONCHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FSO FLAG SERVICE ORG: $10,000 · OtherCHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FSO FLAG SERVICE ORGSTORY BOOK HILL PARK & ZOO: $8,000 · OtherWE ARE LAUREL CANYON: $6,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · Other+13 more: $21,600 · Other+13 moreLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $45,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PHILHARMO…+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureCOLORADO PUPPY RESCUE OF COLORADO: $11,500 · AnimalsCOLORADO PU…SOUTHERN COUNTIES RESCUE INC: $8,000 · AnimalsSOUTHERN CO…CATS AT THE STUDIOS INC: $2,000 · AnimalsCATS AT THE…Denver Dachshunds Rescue and Transport: $2,000 · AnimalsDenver Dach…MENTAL HEALTH ADVOCACY SERVICES INC: $5,500 · HealthTHE SALGI ESOPHAGEAL CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $2,200 · HealthTHE EARTH ORGANIZATION: $5,000 · EnvironmentBags Into Beds: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$153,400Arts & Culture$46,000Animals$23,500Health$7,700Environment$5,000Housing & Shelter$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PERFORMANCE ZONE INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOLORADO PUPPY RESCUE OF COLORADO: $11,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH ADVOCACY SERVICES INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE EARTH ORGANIZATION: $5,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetRESCUES ROCK INC: $5,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SALGI ESOPHAGEAL CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $2,200 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE MUSIC FESTIVAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS ON THE BLOCK: $1,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE PERFORMANCE ZONE INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO PUPPY RESCUE OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN COUNTIES RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ADVOCACY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EARTH ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds RESCUES ROCK INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION ↗
  • Who funds THE SALGI ESOPHAGEAL CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CATS AT THE STUDIOS INC ↗
  • Who funds Denver Dachshunds Rescue and Transport ↗
  • Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE MUSIC FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds KIDS ON THE BLOCK ↗
  • Who funds MCMINNVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kohn Family Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kohn Family Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kohn Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph