Skip to content

· Private foundation

Koenig Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$84k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$84k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$308kHuman Services$182kPhilanthropy$84kHousing & Shelter$80kFood & Nutrition$43kPublic Benefit$10kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$83,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Donor Advised Fund$83,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $132k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $67k → 14%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $50k → 14%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $14k → 14%FAMILY FOCUS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$484k · 4 repeat orgs$270k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
12

Total granted

$484k
$186k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+24%

Still filing today

100%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $84k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LO
    LEMONS OF LOVE INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $173k · revenue +66%
  • SC
    SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $131k · revenue +28%
  • EH
    Endeavor Health Clinical Operations
    3× · 2018–2020 · $100k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • Y
    YWCA
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • S
    SHORE
    one grant, 2021 · $45k
  • NF
    NORTHFIELD FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Illinois Children's Healthcare Foundation
Human Services
2
Illinois Institute for Children

Providing Social Services to Families including Child Care

Human Services
3
Chicago Hope Inc

Chicago Hope runs a food pantry twice a week that serves over 100 families. The organization is working toward the furtherance of wrap around services.

Human Services
4
Northern Il Helping Hands Food Pantry Nfp

To provide at least 2 days of food to needy families and people.

Food & Nutrition
5
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Ann & robert h. lurie children's hospital of chicago is dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a…

Health
6
Center for Family Services

Administering an array of critical, intensive therapeutic interventions and/or facilitation services to emotionally and behaviorally disturbed clients for whom DCFS is legally responsible in order to stabilize their traditional or home of…

Human Services
7
Garden Center Services

Advancing lives of connection, contribution and meaning for persons with developmental disabilities and the individuals that support them.

—
8
True Chicago
Arts & Culture
9
Hands of Hope Illinois
Education
10
Grand Prairie Services Llc

The provision of holistic emotional and behavioral health services for individuals, families and communities with an emphasis on recovery and optimal functioning.

Human Services
11
Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group

Northwestern memorial healthcare is an integrated healthcare system, consisting of multiple hospitals (including northwestern memorial hospital, an academic medical center) and networks of physicians and healthcare professionals, where the…

Health
12
United Way of Illinois

Strengthen United Way movement in Illinois

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections for the Homeless Inc; the most unlike its peers is Endeavor Health Clinical Operations. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEMONS OF LOVE INC: $173,050 · HealthLEMONS OF LOVE INCEndeavor Health Clinical Operations: $100,000 · HealthEndeavor Health Clinical OperationsDonor Advised Fund: $83,500 · OtherDonor Advised FundYWCA: $50,000 · OtherYWCASHORE: $45,000 · OtherSHORENORTHFIELD FOOD PANTRY: $20,000 · OtherNORTHFIELD FOOD PANTRYST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH: $20,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCHVILLAGE OF LINCOLNWOOD: $10,000 · OtherSHRINER'S HOSPITAL: $10,000 · Other+2 more: $5,000 · OtherSHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $130,857 · Human ServicesSHORE COMMUNITY SER…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesCONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $80,000 · Housing & ShelterCONNECTIONS …NILES TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Food & NutritionNORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY: $10,000 · Food & NutritionGiant Steps Illinois Inc: $5,000 · Education
Health$273,050Other$243,500Human Services$131,857Housing & Shelter$80,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEMONS OF LOVE INC: $173,050 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetSHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $130,857 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetEndeavor Health Clinical Operations: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $80,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetNILES TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetGiant Steps Illinois Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY FOCUS LEGACY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEMONS OF LOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Endeavor Health Clinical Operations ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds NILES TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds Giant Steps Illinois Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY FOCUS LEGACY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL12.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Koenig Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Koenig Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Koenig Family Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Koenig Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Koenig Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph