· Public charity
Knights of Columbus Intellectual Disabilities Foundation of Nebraska
Assist those with intellectual disabilities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $159,820 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $189,915 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $30,095 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VILLA MARIE SCHOOL | $41,388 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEBRASKA | $29,157 |
| MOSAIC | $22,695 |
| ARC OF NEBRASKA | $17,178 |
| MADONNA ABILITY ALLIANCE | $15,650 |
| SMILE INC | $11,834 |
| UNITED WAY OF WESTERN NEBRASKA | $10,959 |
| BUCKBOARD THERAPEUTIC RIDING | $10,959 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $92k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against -30% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SOSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEBRASKA INC9× · 2017–2025 · $302k · revenue +91%
- TATHE ARC OF NEBRASKA INC9× · 2017–2025 · $192k · revenue +50% · 30% of their budget
- MMOSAIC9× · 2017–2025 · $147k · revenue +73%
Funded once
- VMVilla Maria Schoolone grant, 2019 · $34k
- WEWINDSONG EQUITHERAPYone grant, 2024 · $9k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide a reasonable volume of developmentally disabled services to residents of the surrounding region who are or shall be diagnosed or thought to be developmentally disabled.
"to heal with horses" by offering nationally accredited, affordable, horse-centered therapies and experiences that bring strength, independence, confidence and joy to central oregonians of all ages and abilities.
Provide therapeutic horsemanship to disabled individuals.
Provide recreational and therapeutic riding on horseback for about 120 people with disabilities
Special Equestrians provides therapeutic riding programs to individuals with physical, mental, and emotional disabilities.
By partnering with horses, we help people realize their individual potential through customized equine assisted services
National center for equine facilitated training is dedicated to helping people with special needs reach beyond their boundaries through equine-assisted therapies, education, and research.
SES provides equine-based therapy to serve children, adults, and Veterans in Southern Illinois. In 2025, we provided 1,000 hours of equine therapy to participants from Southern Illinois.
To provide therapeautic benefits to handicapped citizens through a horseback riding program.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Olympics Nebraska Inc and the most unlike its peers is Knights of the Holy Eucharist Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEBRASKA INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF NEBRASKA INC ↗
- Who funds MOSAIC ↗
- Who funds KNIGHTS OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST INC ↗
- Who funds BUCKBOARD THERAPEUTIC RIDING ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds STEPHANIE'S MIRACLE IN LOVING EQUIN ↗
- Who funds OLLIE WEBB CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SHELTERING TREE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF WESTERN NEBRASKA ↗
- Who funds DUET FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WINDSONG EQUITHERAPY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Midlands Community Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Knights of Columbus Intellectual Disabilities Foundation of Nebraska funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Knights of Columbus Intellectual Disabilities Foundation of Nebraska?
Find your warmest path to Knights of Columbus Intellectual Disabilities Foundation of Nebraska through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.