Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Knights of Columbus Council 1883

Serve the local catholic community

$2.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
50
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Religion$1.3MRecreation & Sports$1.1MEducation$542kHuman Services$456kPublic Safety & Disaster$322kYouth Development$300kCommunity Improvement$285kHealth$176kOther$0
02FY2024 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 50 grants below total $1,703,856 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,165,737 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $461,881 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $75k
  • $10k–50k30 grants · $557k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.1M
$14,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WC YOUTH SPORTS$150,144
ST JAMES BASILICA$141,242
GIVING A FUTURE FOUNDATION LLC$133,041
STJOHN'S ACADEMY$121,196
FACE FOUNDATION$116,341
DIOCESE OF FARGO$115,000
STUTSMAN COUNTY ND$107,668
JAMESTOWN PARKS AND REC$96,984
ANNE CARLSEN CENTER$90,120
JAMESTOWN FINE ARTS ASSOCIATION INC$49,000
JAMESTOWN PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$48,020
JAMESTOWN RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT$42,518
NORTH DAKOTA SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC$42,000
EL ZAGAL MYSTICS$29,282
EDDY FUNERAL HOME$21,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%A MOMENT OF FREEDOM: $7k → 11%A MOMENT OF FREEDOM: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 17% of Knights of Columbus Council 1883’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in ND; read by stated purpose it is 80% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Knights of Columbus Council 1883lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.1M · 36 repeat orgs$871k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.

36 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
38

Total granted

$4.1M
$396k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
-4%

Still filing today

50%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $475k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsEducationHealthPublic Safety & DisasterYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • F(
    FACE (FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF CHRISTIAN EDUCATION
    6× · 2018–2024 · $287k · revenue +78% · 37% of their budget
  • JP
    JAMESTOWN PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $271k · revenue +98%
  • JR
    JAMESTOWN RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT
    7× · 2018–2024 · $249k · revenue +100% · 45% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $23k
  • DW
    DON WILHELMS
    one grant, 2021 · $21k
  • MS
    MONTPELIER SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jamestown Frontier Attractions

To provide a safe, fun, educational, and engaging experience for all through a nd pioneer-era lens

Education
2
Jamestown Fire Department

Provide fire and rescue services for the town of jamestown

3
Jamestown Community College Foundation Inc

To benefit jamestown community college in carrying out its educational, scientific, capital and cultural programs.

Education
4
Jamestown Drag Racing Association

To promote and provide entertainment for the local area in central north dakota.

Arts & Culture
5
Jamestown Area Chamber of Commerce

To promote civic, economic, & social growth

6
Jamestown Historical Society

To collect, preserve and share the heritage of jamestown ri

7
Jamestown Arts Center

Mission is to engage, enrich and inspire our community through extraordinary arts and educational experiences.

Arts & Culture
8
The James River Basin Partnership

To improve and protect the water quality in the james river watershed and table rock lake.

Environment
9
Jamestown Center City Development Corporation

As a non-profit, multi-service facility, northwest arena is committed to enriching our community through year-round events and activities that connect, engage, and transform.jamestown center city development corporation is a new york…

Community Improvement
10
Babe Ruth League of Jamestown

Babe ruth baseball league

Recreation & Sports
11
Janesville Youth Hockey Club Inc

Operation of a youth hockey club that exposes the youth of our community to hockey and develops their skills.

Recreation & Sports
12
Friends of Jamestown Seniors Inc

Fund and operate a senior center

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jamestown Fine Arts Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is S a F E Shelter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%4%<5yr13%14%5–10yr14%10%10–20yr13%16%20–35yr16%33%35–55yr25%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%1%<5yr13%10%5–10yr14%3%10–20yr13%16%20–35yr16%27%35–55yr25%43%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/73
the rest of the field
8%
105/1,259

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
22/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST JAMES BASILICA OF JAMESTOWN — $1,171,995 · OtherST JAMES BASILICA OF JAMESTOWNWC YOUTH SPORTS — $453,581 · OtherWC YOUTH SPORTSSTUTSMAN COUNTY ND — $316,191 · OtherSTUTSMAN COUNTY NDGIVING A FUTURE FOUNDATION LLC — $133,041 · Other+75 more — $1,559,883 · Other+75 moreJAMESTOWN PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION INC — $270,846 · Recreation & SportsJAMESTOWN P…SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH DAKOTA INC — $164,728 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLY…JAMESRIVER FIGURE SKATING CLUB INC — $32,510 · Recreation & SportsJAMESRIVER …+4 more — $26,193 · Recreation & SportsFACE (FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF CHRISTIAN EDUCATION — $287,119 · EducationFACE (FOUN…ANNE CARLSEN CENTER — $132,105 · EducationANNE CARLS…University of Jamestown — $30,230 · EducationUniversity…JAMESTOWN RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT — $249,095 · Public Safety & DisasterMARION FIRE DEPARTMENT — $10,000 · Public Safety & DisasterFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $33,000 · Youth DevelopmentMEDINA BOOSTER CLUB — $14,500 · Youth DevelopmentJamestown Regional Medical Center Foundation Inc — $18,986 · HealthGACKLE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $11,623 · HealthTHE FIRM FOUNDATION INC — $11,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY ACTION REGION VI — $40,860 · Housing & Shelter
Other$3,634,691Recreation & Sports$494,277Education$449,454Public Safety & Disaster$259,095Youth Development$47,500Health$41,609Housing & Shelter$40,860

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFACE (FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF CHRISTIAN EDUCATION — $287,119 over 6y, 37% of budgetJAMESTOWN PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION INC — $270,846 over 4y, 22% of budgetJAMESTOWN RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT — $249,095 over 7y, 45% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH DAKOTA INC — $164,728 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetANNE CARLSEN CENTER — $132,105 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJAMESTOWN FINE ARTS ASSOCIATION INC — $117,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetSHRINERS INTERNATIONAL — $85,582 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetJAMESTOWN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $41,500 over 3y, 99% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION REGION VI — $40,860 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $33,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Jamestown — $30,230 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUNTINGTON'S DISEASE SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC — $27,795 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJAMESTOWN SOCCER FEDERATION — $21,692 over 2y, 20% of budgetJames River Senior Citizens Center Inc — $19,383 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFuture Pheasants Inc — $19,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetJamestown Regional Medical Center Foundation Inc — $18,986 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCANDID — $16,682 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVETERAN HONOR FLIGHT OF NDMN — $16,580 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNORTH DAKOTA PEACE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION — $15,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetMEDINA BOOSTER CLUB — $14,500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetA MOMENT OF FREEDOM — $12,650 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetJAMES RIVER HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $12,582 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetNORTH DAKOTA KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS FOUNDATION — $11,980 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetGACKLE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $11,623 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE FIRM FOUNDATION INC — $11,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetJAMESTOWN TOURISM — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMARION FIRE DEPARTMENT — $10,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetS A F E SHELTER — $8,800 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetJHS SOPHISTIKIX BOOSTER CLUB — $7,510 over 1y, 26% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK OF NORTH DAKOTA INC — $7,165 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetJAMESTOWN GYMNASTICS CLUBINC — $6,800 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetJAMESTOWN HOCKEY BOOSTER CLUB INC — $6,500 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetJAMESTOWN AREA YOUTH BB — $5,383 over 1y, 2.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FACE (FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF CHRISTIAN EDUCATION
  • Who funds JAMESTOWN PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds JAMESTOWN RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH DAKOTA INC
  • Who funds ANNE CARLSEN CENTER
  • Who funds JAMESTOWN FINE ARTS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds SHRINERS INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds JAMESTOWN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION REGION VI
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds JAMESRIVER FIGURE SKATING CLUB INC
  • Who funds University of Jamestown
  • Who funds HUNTINGTON'S DISEASE SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds JAMESTOWN SOCCER FEDERATION
  • Who funds James River Senior Citizens Center Inc
  • Who funds Future Pheasants Inc
  • Who funds Jamestown Regional Medical Center Foundation Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring FoundationND25.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring Foundation · Otter Tail Power Company Foundation · Jamestown Tourism · Cliff and Charlotte L Bellon Fdn · North Dakota Community Foundation · Dakota Medical Foundation · Sanford Group Return · Midcontinent Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Knights of Columbus Council 1883 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Knights of Columbus Council 1883?

    Find your warmest path to Knights of Columbus Council 1883 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 97 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph