Skip to content

· Public charity

Knights of Columbus Council 13

The knights of columbus is a catholic fraternal organization dedicated to the promotion and charitable giving to members and the community.

$60k
Granted FY2021
3
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Religion$167kEducation$14kHuman Services$8kHealth$7kCrime & Legal$1kPublic Benefit$250Food & Nutrition$50Other$0
02FY2021 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $40,180, the rows itemized in this filing. The $60,206 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,026 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$10,180
Median grant
1
States reached
$155k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SACRED HEART CHU$25,000
ST ABTHONY CHURC$10,180
PROVIDENCE HS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 5% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ST ANTHONY CHURC: $10k → 10%HOLY FAMILY: $3k → 10%HANOVER COLLEGE: $2k → 12%GIBAULT SCHOOL: $2k → 19%CRUSADE FOR CHIL: $2k → 15%ST ABTHONY CHURC: $10k → 10%OUR LADY OF PERP: $3k → 10%HANOVER COLLEGE: $2k → 12%GIBAULT SCHOOL: $2k → 19%CRUSADE FOR CHIL: $2k → 15%ST ANTHONY CHURC: $6k → 10%ST MARY: $2k → 10%PROVIDENCE HS: $5k → 10%OLPH: $1k → 10%ST ANTHONY CHURC: $5k → 10%ST ANTHONY CHURC: $2k → 10%SOU IN CATH FBAL: $1k → 10%ST MICHAEL CHURC: $1k → 10%SACRED HEART: $48k → 10%SACRED HEART CHU: $25k → 10%SACRED HEART CHU: $11k → 10%ST AUGUSTINE: $8k → 10%ST AUGUSTINE CH: $7k → 10%SACRED HEART CH: $6k → 10%CTR LAY MINISTRY: $5k → 10%ST AUGUSTINE CHU: $4k → 10%SACRED HEART CHU: $3k → 10%JEFF HIGH SCHOOL: $3k → 10%ST AUGUSTINE CHU: $3k → 10%SIC CROSS CTRY: $3k → 10%SIC CROSS CTRY: $3k → 10%CTR LAY MINISTRY: $2k → 10%JEFF HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 10%JEFF HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 10%JEFF FOP LODGE: $1k → 10%FOP LODGE: $1k → 10%CTR LAY MINISTRY: $1k → 10%JEFF HIGH SCHOOL: $600 → 10%JEFF LITTLE LEAG: $250 → 10%ST JOHN PAUL: $2k → 10%CITY OF JEFFERSO: $250 → 10%ST JOSEPH CHURCH: $2k → 10%COMMUNITY KITCHE: $50 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$181k · 10 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +84% since the first grant, against +66% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2021, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
10

Total granted

$181k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
+66%

Still filing today

30%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
EducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CENTER FOR LAY MINISTRIES INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $8k · revenue +156%
  • GI
    Gibault Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $3k · revenue +27%
  • HC
    Hanover College
    2× · 2019–2020 · $3k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • HF
    HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC CHURCH NEW ALBANY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • SJ
    ST JOHN PAUL II CATHOLIC CHURCH SELLERSBURG INC
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
5/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SACRED HEART CATHOLIC CHURCH JEFFERSONVILLE INC: $92,589 · OtherSACRED HEART CATHOLIC CHURCH JEFFERSONVILLE INCST ANTHONY OF PADUA CATHOLIC CHURCH CLARKSVILLE INC: $54,528 · OtherST ANTHONY OF PADUA CATHOLIC CHURCH CLARKSVILLE INC+15 more: $37,492 · Other+15 moreCENTER FOR LAY MINISTRIES INC: $7,500 · Food & NutritionGibault Inc: $3,300 · EducationHanover College: $3,000 · EducationTHE COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $50 · Philanthropy
Other$184,609Food & Nutrition$7,500Education$6,300Philanthropy$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGibault Inc: $3,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHanover College: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE CHARLES C O'HERN LODGE 100: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTER FOR LAY MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Gibault Inc ↗
  • Who funds Hanover College ↗
  • Who funds FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE CHARLES C O'HERN LODGE 100 ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Institute for Quality Education IncIN19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Institute for Quality Education Inc · Community Foundation of Southern Indiana Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Knights of Columbus Council 13 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Knights of Columbus Council 13. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Knights of Columbus Council 13?

    Find your warmest path to Knights of Columbus Council 13 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $17k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Knights of Columbus Council 13’s filings →

    More from the funding graph