Loading…
· Public charity
Knights of Columbus 6344 Corp
To donate to Catholic Charities
$132k
Granted FY2025
8
Grants
1
Communities
$45k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 76% of Knights of Columbus 6344 Corp’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
—
2020
—
2021
—
2022
—
2023
membersfoodneedyworks
2024
food
2025
dementiamedicallovebuildinghopefoodfaith
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2025 · 8 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$58k
Total assets
Largest grants
- Catholic Faith Appeal$45,000
- Our Daily Bread Food Pantry$15,035
- St Vincent DePaul Society$10,000
- Marco Dementia Respite$9,000
- Judy Sullivan Resource Center$8,500
- Community Pregnancy Clinics$8,000
- Habitat for Humanity$8,000
- Special Olympics$6,746
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$524k · 6 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
6
2
Total granted
$524k
$28k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+40%
+17%
Still filing today
50%
50%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesFood & NutritionMembership BenefitHealthHousing & ShelterOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ODOur Daily Bread Food Pantry3× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue +2535%
- SVSt Vincent DePaul Society3× · 2023–2025 · $40k · revenue +40%
- JSJudy Sullivan Resource Center2× · 2024–2025 · $17k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- KOK of C Florida State Councilone grant, 2019 · $20k
- KOK of C Supreme Councilone grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +17%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Catholic Palliative Care Services Inc
Provides responsive end-of-life care to patients and families in broward and miami-dade counties.
—
2
Catholic Charities of Northwest Florida
Catholic charities carries out the social mission of the catholic church in northwest florida to serve, empower, and advocate for vulnerable families and individuals of any race, religion, or national origin.
—
3
St Anne's Nursing Center
The organization provides nursing and assisted care to individuals of all faiths regardless of ability to pay.
Health
4
Catholic Charities Bureau Inc
The mission of Catholic Charities is to provide services to anyone in need, regardless of race or religion, to advocate justice, human dignity and quality of life, and to call all people to join in these efforts; thereby reflecting the…
Human Services
5
Catholic Elderly Services Inc
The organization's specific and primary purpose is to establish, receive and maintain funds for the support of catholic elderly services within the archdiocese of miami.
Human Services
6
Catholic Hospice Inc
Provides responsive end-of-life care to patients and families in broward and miami-dade counties.
Human Services
7
Society of St Vincent De Paul Council
A network of neighbors, inspired by gospel values, growing in holiness and building a more just world through personal relationships with and service to people in need.
Human Services
8
Bay Village of Sarasota Inc
Established on christian principles, bay village of sarasota, inc. (bvsi) offers a dynamic, secure, and comprehensive residency for older adults, providing meaningful community life with continuing care. bvsi is a church-related continuing…
Human Services
9
Catholic Charities Corporation
Respond to those in need through an integrated system of quality services designed to respect the dignity of every person and build a just and compassionate society.
Human Services
10
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of
Catholic charities diocese of baton rouge provides the community with services related to employment opportunities for elderly. counseling services, disaster relief, foster grandparent service, etc. (all listed under program services)
Human Services
11
Villa Maria Nursing &
Villa maria nursing and rehabilitation center provides nursing and rehabilitative care to individuals of all faiths regardless of any individual's ability to pay for services, including routine and ancillary care, in support of the…
Health
12
St Vincent De Paul Stores
A network of neighbors, inspired by gospel values, growing in holiness and building a more just world through personal relationships with and service to people in need.
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Vincent Depaul Society Naples and the most unlike its peers is Marco Dementia Respite Mdr Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$435,563Food & Nutrition$60,035Human Services$56,206Health$9,000Housing & Shelter$8,000Membership Benefit$7,522
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Collier Community Foundation IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Knights of Columbus 6344 Corp funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Our Daily Bread Food Pantry.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 26.3× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 832956050 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Our Daily Bread Food Pantry, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 0% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Knights of Columbus 6344 Corp?
Find your warmest path to Knights of Columbus 6344 Corp through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines