Skip to content

· Public charity

Knights of Columbus 560

Subsidized local catholic education and community activities benefitting 600 to 1,000 children and adults

$409k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$118k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$2.5MEducation$366kInternational$288kHealth$229kFood & Nutrition$190kPhilanthropy$187kHuman Services$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $364,180, the rows itemized in this filing. The $409,314 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $45,134 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $160k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $176k
$15,963
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LAWRENCE$117,924
ST MICHAELS SCHOOL$57,592
HAITI LIBRARY FOUNDATION$33,863
ST MARY'S$32,494
OLPH$26,656
SOUP KITCHEN OF MUNCIE$21,634
ST FRANCIS$15,963
GIBAULT$15,441
K OF C - 4TH DEGREE$14,306
FIRST CHICE FOR WOMEN$8,335
Individual grant recipient$8,240
INDIANA STATE KNIGHTS OF COLUMB$6,253
YORK TOWN HIGH SCHOOL$5,479
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $288k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%OLPH: $46k → 19%OLPH: $36k → 19%OLPH: $35k → 19%OLPH: $35k → 19%OLPH: $32k → 19%OLPH: $28k → 19%OLPH: $28k → 19%OLPH: $27k → 19%OLPH: $21k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 9 repeat orgs$101k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$3.7M
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+8%

Still filing today

56%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationInternationalFood & NutritionHealthMembership BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OL
    OUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP HAITIAN ORPHANAGE FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $288k · revenue +7% · 35% of their budget
  • GI
    Gibault Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $209k · revenue +31%
  • TS
    THE SOUP KITCHEN OF MUNCIE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $190k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • KO
    KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS 560
    one grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue -33%
  • KO
    KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue +8%
  • TG
    THE GABRIEL PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +324%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Knights of Columbus-Bishop Gunn Council #1583

The knights of columbus provide contributions to st. john catholic church.

—
2
Knights of Columbus Council No 1226

The purpose of the organization is: (1) rendering pecuniary aid to its members, their families and beneficiaries of members and their families;(2) rendering mutual aid and assistance to its sick, disabled and needy members and their…

—
3
Knights of Columbus 1584

Catholic religious organization

—
4
Knights of Columbus Kansas State Council

A catholic, family, fraternal, service organization

—
5
Knights of Columbus Tennessee State Council

None

—
6
Knights of Columbus

Catholic Fraternal Organization Focused on Charitable Giving

—
7
Knights of Columbus

Empowering catholic men to live their faith at home, in their parish, at work and in their community.

—
8
Knights of Columbus Council

The knights of columbus is an order of catholic gentlemen comitted to the exemplification of charity, unity , fraternity, patriotism, respect for life, and defense of the preisthood.

—
9
Michigan Knights of Columbus Charities
Community Improvement
10
Knights of Columbus St Augustine Council 41

The knights of columbus is a catholic men's organization that aims to support its members and their families, promote charitable works, and serve the community.

—
11
Knights of Columbus 1580

Catholic fraternal organization

—
12
Knights of Columbus 3746

The purposes for which this council is formed are:(a) to promote fraternal,charitable, educational, civic, athletic, and social pursuit; (b) to render mutual aid and assistance to its sick, disabled, and needy members and their families;…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Knights of Columbus; the most unlike its peers is Haiti Library Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST LAWRENCE: $1,436,679 · OtherST LAWRENCEST MARY'S: $884,937 · OtherST MARY'SST FRANCIS: $215,083 · OtherST FRANCISBISHOP WM ARNOLD ASSEMBLY 0243 KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS: $187,306 · OtherBISHOP WM ARNOLD ASSEMBLY 0243 KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS+5 more: $83,785 · OtherHaiti Library Foundation Inc: $295,910 · InternationalOUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP HAITIAN ORPHANAGE FOUNDATION INC: $287,907 · Human Services+1 more: $5,304 · Human ServicesGibault Inc: $208,860 · Education+1 more: $5,479 · EducationTHE SOUP KITCHEN OF MUNCIE INC: $189,696 · Food & NutritionFIRST CHOICE FOR WOMEN INC: $19,665 · HealthKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS: $6,026 · Membership Benefit
Other$2,807,790International$295,910Human Services$293,211Education$214,339Food & Nutrition$189,696Health$19,665Membership Benefit$6,026

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHaiti Library Foundation Inc: $295,910 over 9y, 73% of budgetOUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP HAITIAN ORPHANAGE FOUNDATION INC: $287,907 over 9y, 35% of budgetGibault Inc: $208,860 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SOUP KITCHEN OF MUNCIE INC: $189,696 over 9y, 18% of budgetFIRST CHOICE FOR WOMEN INC: $19,665 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS 560: $6,600 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS #1042: $6,253 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS: $6,026 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Haiti Library Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds OUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP HAITIAN ORPHANAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Gibault Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SOUP KITCHEN OF MUNCIE INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST CHOICE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS 560 ↗
  • Who funds KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS #1042 ↗
  • Who funds KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS ↗
  • Who funds THE ENDOWMENT PROJECT EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GABRIEL PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Muncie and Delaware County IncIN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Muncie and Delaware County Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Knights of Columbus 560 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Knights of Columbus 560. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Knights of Columbus 560?

    Find your warmest path to Knights of Columbus 560 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Knights of Columbus 560’s filings →

    More from the funding graph