Skip to content

· Private foundation

Knapp Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$72k
Granted FY2026still arriving
7
Grants FY2026still arriving
7
States reached
$44k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$366kRecreation & Sports$29kEmployment$7kYouth Development$4kArts & Culture$1kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2026 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k5 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $54k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY$43,500
CONNECTICUT COLLEGE$10,000
KIDS PLAY INTERNATIONAL INC$5,000
PROCTOR ACADEMY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
NORTH BENNET STREET SCHOOL$3,000
POINT FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NORTH BENNET STREET SCHOOL: $3k → 16%SUPERNOVA SCHOLARS INC: $30k → 11%CONSTRUCTING HOPE PRE- APPRENTICESHIP PR: $2k → 12%CONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $10k → 9%WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $44k → 15%CANTERBURY SCHOOL: $5k → 16%KIDS PLAY INTERNATIONAL INC: $6k → 5%PROCTOR ACADEMY: $5k → 7%NORTH BENNET STREET SCHOOL: $3k → 16%SUPERNOVA SCHOLARS INC: $25k → 11%CONSTRUCTING HOPE PRE- APPRENTICESHIP: $2k → 12%CONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $5k → 9%WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $43k → 15%KIDS PLAY INTERNATIONAL INC: $5k → 5%PROCTOR ACADEMY: $3k → 7%NORTH BENNET STREET SCHOOL: $3k → 16%SUPERNOVA SCHOLARS INC: $24k → 11%CONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $3k → 9%WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $38k → 15%KIDS PLAY INTERNATIONAL INC: $5k → 5%PROCTOR ACADEMY: $3k → 7%NORTH BENNET STREET SCHOOL: $2k → 16%SUPERNOVA SCHOLARS INC: $5k → 11%CONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $3k → 9%WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $36k → 15%KIDS PLAY INTERNATIONAL INC: $5k → 5%PROCTOR ACADEMY: $3k → 7%NORTH BENNET STREET SCHOOL: $2k → 16%CONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $3k → 9%WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $28k → 15%KIDS PLAY INTERNATIONAL INC: $5k → 5%PROCTOR ACADEMY: $3k → 7%CONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $3k → 9%WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $25k → 15%KIDS PLAY INTERNATIONAL INC: $3k → 5%PROCTOR ACADEMY: $3k → 7%CONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $3k → 9%WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $24k → 15%KIDS PLAY INTERNATIONAL INC: $3k → 5%PROCTOR ACADEMY: $3k → 7%CONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $3k → 9%WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $23k → 15%KIDS PLAY INTERNATIONAL INC: $3k → 5%PROCTOR ACADEMY: $3k → 7%GIRLS INC OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST: $2k → 12%REAP USA: $3k → 12%REAP USA: $3k → 12%REAP USA: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MA
OR
CT
CA
UT
TN
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$478k · 12 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$478k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+106%

Still filing today

92%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationInternationalYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2019–2026 · $261k · revenue +33%
  • KP
    Kids Play International Inc
    8× · 2019–2026 · $34k · revenue +47%
  • CC
    CONNECTICUT COLLEGE
    8× · 2019–2026 · $31k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • CS
    CANTERBURY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • NF
    NASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +106%
  • SY
    SEE YA LATER FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +70%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
2
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
3
The Winsor School

Our mission: the winsor school prepares young women to pursue their aspirations and contribute to the world.

Education
4
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
5
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
6
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

—
7
Pomona College

Throughout its history, pomona college has educated men and women of exceptional promise. we gather individuals, regardless of financial circumstances, into a small residential community that is strongly rooted in southern california yet…

Education
8
Phillips Exeter Academy

Unite goodness and knowledge and inspire youth from every quarter to lead purposeful lives. [text in quotations is taken from the academy's deed of gift, drafted in 1781] knowledge and goodness "above all, it is expected that the attention…

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
11
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
12
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connecticut College; the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $261,498 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITYSUPERNOVA SCHOLARS INC: $84,323 · EducationSUPERNOVA SCHOLARS INCCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $31,000 · EducationCONNECTICUT COLLEGEPROCTOR ACADEMY: $22,500 · EducationNorth Bennet Street School: $16,000 · Education+5 more: $17,000 · EducationKids Play International Inc: $33,500 · InternationalIndividual grant recipient: $9,750 · OtherCANTERBURY SCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherDANCER PROJECT: $1,000 · Other+1 more: $250 · OtherGirls Inc of the Pacific Northwest: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentNASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionYAMHILL ENRICHMENT SOCIETY: $250 · Community Improvement
Education$432,321International$33,500Other$16,000Youth Development$3,000Food & Nutrition$1,000Community Improvement$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $261,498 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSUPERNOVA SCHOLARS INC: $84,323 over 4y, 38% of budgetKids Play International Inc: $33,500 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $31,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPROCTOR ACADEMY: $22,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Bennet Street School: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetConstructing Hope Pre-Apprenticeship Program: $7,400 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPOINT FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHADOW PROJECT: $3,300 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGirls Inc of the Pacific Northwest: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSMART READING: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEE YA LATER FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYAMHILL ENRICHMENT SOCIETY: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SUPERNOVA SCHOLARS INC ↗
  • Who funds Kids Play International Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PROCTOR ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds North Bennet Street School ↗
  • Who funds Constructing Hope Pre-Apprenticeship Program ↗
  • Who funds POINT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SHADOW PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Girls Inc of the Pacific Northwest ↗
  • Who funds SMART READING ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SEE YA LATER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YAMHILL ENRICHMENT SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR14.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Knapp Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Knapp Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • The Shadow Project: 8% of income from government
  • Girls Inc of the Pacific Northwest: 4% of income from government
  • Smart Reading: 3% of income from government
  • Constructing Hope Pre-Apprenticeship Program: 2% of income from government
  • Connecticut College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Knapp Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Knapp Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Knapp Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph