Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kleinmuntz Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$96k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$333kHealth$280kSocial Science$44kScience & Tech$32kHuman Services$15kReligion$4kArts & Culture$1kAnimals$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $88k
$550
Median grant
4
States reached
$674k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Chicago Medicine$25,000
University of Illinois Foundation$25,000
U of Chicago Laboratory Schools$15,000
Spertus Institute$12,500
Northwestern Memorial Foundation$10,000
KAM Isaiah Israel Congretation$3,818
U of Chicago Laboratory Schools$2,500
Art Institute of Chicago$550
Chicago Botanic Garden$388
Griffith Museum of Science & Industry$300
WTTW$300
Freckles Foundation & Rescue$250
Field Museum$250
Jewish United Fund$236
Peaceful Valley Donkey Rescue$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Invest for Kids: $10k → 14%Invest for Kids: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$474k · 6 repeat orgs$235k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against -8% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$474k
$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
-8%

Still filing today

33%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesSocial ScienceEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Chicago
    4× · 2021–2024 · $225k · revenue +34%
  • NM
    Northwestern Memorial Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $120k
  • SI
    Spertus Institute
    4× · 2022–2025 · $45k

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Chicago Pediatrics
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • BZ
    BERNARD ZELL ANSHE EMET DAY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -8%
  • IF
    Institute for Operations Research a
    one grant, 2021 · $17k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Zoological Society

To inspire conservation leadership by connecting people with wildlife and nature.

Animals
2
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
3
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
4
Indiana University Foundation

The Indiana University Foundation (IUF) maximizes private philanthropic support for Indiana University by fostering lifelong relationships with key stakeholders and providing advancement leadership and fundraising services for (Continued…

Education
5
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
6
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
7
The Salk Institute for Biological Studies

Unlocking the secrets of life itself is the driving force behind the salk institute. our team of world-class, award-winning scientists pushes boundaries of knowledge in areas such as neuroscience, cancer research, aging, immunobiology,…

Science & Tech
8
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
9
Northwestern University

Northwestern is committed to excellent teaching, innovative research and the personal and intellectual growth of its students in a diverse academic community.

Recreation & Sports
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
12
Institute for the International Education of Students

The Institute for the International Education of Students (IES) blends the best elements of foreign higher education with American University requirements and encourages students to explore the unique elements of foreign countries.…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Horticultural Society; the most unlike its peers is Freckles Foundation & Animal Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
5/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Northwestern Memorial Foundation: $120,000 · OtherNorthwestern Memorial FoundationUniversity of Chicago Pediatrics: $100,000 · OtherUniversity of Chicago PediatricsSpertus Institute: $45,000 · OtherSpertus InstituteUniversity of Chicago Medicine: $40,000 · OtherUniversity of Chicago MedicineInst for Oper Research and Mgmt Sci: $29,000 · OtherInst for Oper Research and Mgmt SciU of Chicago Laboratory Schools: $17,500 · OtherInstitute for Operations Research a: $17,000 · OtherUniversity of Chicago Biological Sciences Division: $15,000 · OtherSOCIETY FOR JUDGEMENT AND DECISION MAKING INCORPORATED: $15,000 · Other+3 more: $9,118 · OtherUniversity of Chicago: $225,000 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $25,000 · EducationUniversity of Illinois FoundationBERNARD ZELL ANSHE EMET DAY SCHOOL: $20,000 · EducationBERNARD ZELL ANSHE EMET DAY SCHOOL+1 more: $550 · EducationInvest for Kids Inc: $15,000 · Human ServicesINSTITUTE FOR OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND THE MANAGEMENT SCIENCES: $14,500 · Social ScienceWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $300 · Arts & CultureFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $250 · Arts & CultureFRECKLES FOUNDATION & ANIMAL RESCUE: $250 · AnimalsPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc: $150 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $100 · AnimalsCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $388 · EnvironmentJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $236 · Philanthropy
Other$407,618Education$270,550Human Services$15,000Social Science$14,500Arts & Culture$550Animals$500Environment$388Philanthropy$236

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Chicago: $225,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBERNARD ZELL ANSHE EMET DAY SCHOOL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIETY FOR JUDGEMENT AND DECISION MAKING INCORPORATED: $15,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetInvest for Kids Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND THE MANAGEMENT SCIENCES: $14,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRECKLES FOUNDATION & ANIMAL RESCUE: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $236 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kleinmuntz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kleinmuntz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kleinmuntz Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kleinmuntz Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kleinmuntz Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph