· Public charity
Kiwanis Club of Orland Park Kiwanis International Inc
To support other non profit organizations through donations
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 41% of KIWANIS CLUB OF ORLAND PARK KIWANIS INTERNATIONAL INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $210,127 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $271,198 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $61,071 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $115k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE | $53,476 |
| THE CENTER | $37,078 |
| SANDBURG HS SCHOLARSHIPS | $20,000 |
| ORLAND PARK ROTARY | $16,539 |
| MORAINE VALLEY FOUNDATION | $16,260 |
| CRISES CENTER FOR SOUTH SUBUR | $15,538 |
| VIP SERVICE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| ORLAND FOOD PANTRY | $8,000 |
| MCCORD GALLERY | $7,500 |
| PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY TREASURY | $7,130 |
| NAVARRO FARMS | $7,000 |
| CANCER SUPPORT CENTER | $6,000 |
| AAUW | $5,606 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCrisis Center for South Suburbia2× · 2024–2025 · $31k · revenue +2%
- OTOrland Township Food Pantry FDN2× · 2024–2025 · $16k · revenue +19%
- AAAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC2× · 2024–2025 · $12k · revenue +44%
Funded once
- VSVIP SERVICE DOGSone grant, 2025 · $10k
- MHMCCORD HOUSE NFPone grant, 2025 · $8k · revenue 0%
- NFNAVARRO FARMSone grant, 2025 · $7k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the Montgomery County Community Foundation (MCCF) is to provide leadership in Montgomery County by directing sustainable financial resources that strengthen our community and improve the quality of life for current and…
The foundation's mission is to advance opportunities for quality educational services in nebraska-based institutions.
The minneapolis community & technical college foundation helps solve issues of affordability and access to higher education through funds and provides part or all of the funding to the college to develop technical college foundation…
To identify, activate, and support informed and passionate philanthropists who strive to improve the quality of life in our community. we accomplish this by:- building a permanent source of charitable funding- cultivating strategic…
Our mission is to ensure that all people impacted by cancer are empowered by knowledge, strengthened by action, and sustained by community. programs offered are totally free for individuals and families impacted by cancer.
To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.
The community foundation responds to the changing needs of the community by making grants to local nonprofit organizations, awarding scholarships to help local students, working together with donors to build community endowment and…
The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.
The south carolina ovarian cancer foundation (scocf) was created as an organization to support women diagnosed with ovarian cancer, to be a source of education and awareness about the disease to people across the state, and to support…
Our mission is to empower, strengthen and sustain those impacted by cancer in our community through education, support and financial assistance.
The mission of pcc community wellness center is to improve health outcomes for the medically underserved community through the provision of high quality, affordable, and accessible primary health care and support services. anchored with…
To provide lodging to families of hospitalized children at an affordable cost, or no cost, based on need through operation of the ronald mcdonald house.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Chicagoland & Nw Indiana and the most unlike its peers is Orland Township Food Pantry Fdn. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHICAGOLAND & NW INDIANA ↗
- Who funds MORAINE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Crisis Center for South Suburbia ↗
- Who funds Orland Township Food Pantry FDN ↗
- Who funds Pediatric Oncology Treasure Chest ↗
- Who funds JENNIFER S FALLICK CANCER SUPPORT CENTER ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds MCCORD HOUSE NFP ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kiwanis Club of Orland Park Kiwanis International Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.