Skip to content
Kiwanis Club of Orland Park Kiwanis International Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Kiwanis Club of Orland Park Kiwanis International Inc

To support other non profit organizations through donations

$271k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Human Services$185kEducation$79kCommunity Improvement$42kHealth$25kFood & Nutrition$23kAnimals$10kArts & Culture$8k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $210,127, the rows itemized in this filing. The $271,198 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $61,071 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$404k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$53,476
THE CENTER$37,078
SANDBURG HS SCHOLARSHIPS$20,000
ORLAND PARK ROTARY$16,539
MORAINE VALLEY FOUNDATION$16,260
CRISES CENTER FOR SOUTH SUBUR$15,538
VIP SERVICE FOUNDATION$10,000
ORLAND FOOD PANTRY$8,000
MCCORD GALLERY$7,500
PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY TREASURY$7,130
NAVARRO FARMS$7,000
CANCER SUPPORT CENTER$6,000
AAUW$5,606
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CRISES CENTER FOR SOUTH SUBUR: $16k → 14%CANCER SUPPORT CENTER: $6k → 14%CRISES CENTER FOR SOUTH SUBUR: $15k → 14%CANCER SUPPORT CENTER: $6k → 14%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $53k → 14%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $41k → 14%PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY TREASURY: $7k → 14%PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY TREASURY: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$348k · 10 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
3

Total granted

$348k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

70%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Crisis Center for South Suburbia
    2× · 2024–2025 · $31k · revenue +2%
  • OT
    Orland Township Food Pantry FDN
    2× · 2024–2025 · $16k · revenue +19%
  • AA
    AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $12k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • VS
    VIP SERVICE DOGS
    one grant, 2025 · $10k
  • MH
    MCCORD HOUSE NFP
    one grant, 2025 · $8k · revenue 0%
  • NF
    NAVARRO FARMS
    one grant, 2025 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Montgomery County Community Foundation

The mission of the Montgomery County Community Foundation (MCCF) is to provide leadership in Montgomery County by directing sustainable financial resources that strengthen our community and improve the quality of life for current and…

Philanthropy
2
Central Community College Foundation Inc

The foundation's mission is to advance opportunities for quality educational services in nebraska-based institutions.

Education
3
Minneapolis Community & Technical College Foundation

The minneapolis community & technical college foundation helps solve issues of affordability and access to higher education through funds and provides part or all of the funding to the college to develop technical college foundation…

Education
4
Akron Community Foundation

To identify, activate, and support informed and passionate philanthropists who strive to improve the quality of life in our community. we accomplish this by:- building a permanent source of charitable funding- cultivating strategic…

Philanthropy
5
Cancer Support Community Greater Philadelphia

Our mission is to ensure that all people impacted by cancer are empowered by knowledge, strengthened by action, and sustained by community. programs offered are totally free for individuals and families impacted by cancer.

Health
6
Foundation for Women's Cancer

To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.

Health
7
Community Foundation of Lorain County

The community foundation responds to the changing needs of the community by making grants to local nonprofit organizations, awarding scholarships to help local students, working together with donors to build community endowment and…

Philanthropy
8
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
9
South Carolina Ovarian Cancer Foundation

The south carolina ovarian cancer foundation (scocf) was created as an organization to support women diagnosed with ovarian cancer, to be a source of education and awareness about the disease to people across the state, and to support…

Health
10
Oregon Cancer Foundation

Our mission is to empower, strengthen and sustain those impacted by cancer in our community through education, support and financial assistance.

Health
11
Pcc Community Wellness Center

The mission of pcc community wellness center is to improve health outcomes for the medically underserved community through the provision of high quality, affordable, and accessible primary health care and support services. anchored with…

Health
12
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Ne Kansas Inc

To provide lodging to families of hospitalized children at an affordable cost, or no cost, based on need through operation of the ronald mcdonald house.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Chicagoland & Nw Indiana; the most unlike its peers is Orland Township Food Pantry Fdn. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHICAGO SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN COMMUNITY PARISH & COMM CTR FNDTN: $60,396 · OtherCHICAGO SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN COMMUNITY PARISH & …ORLAND PARK ROTARY: $41,962 · OtherORLAND PARK ROTARYCARL SANDBURG HIGH SCHOOL PARENT FACUALTY STUDENT ASSOCIATION: $35,000 · OtherCARL SANDBURG HIGH SCHOOL PARENT FACUALTY STUD…VIP SERVICE DOGS: $10,000 · OtherVIP SERVICE DOGSNAVARRO FARMS: $7,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHICAGOLAND & NW INDIANA: $94,516 · Human ServicesRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHICAGOLAN…Crisis Center for South Suburbia: $30,538 · Human ServicesCrisis Center for South SuburbiaPediatric Oncology Treasure Chest: $13,402 · Human ServicesPediatric Oncology Treasure ChestJENNIFER S FALLICK CANCER SUPPORT CENTER: $12,000 · Human ServicesJENNIFER S FALLICK CANCER SUPPORT CENTERMORAINE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $32,260 · EducationMORAINE VALLE…AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC: $11,982 · EducationAMERICAN ASSO…Orland Township Food Pantry FDN: $16,000 · Food & NutritionMCCORD HOUSE NFP: $7,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$154,358Human Services$150,456Education$44,242Food & Nutrition$16,000Arts & Culture$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHICAGOLAND & NW INDIANA: $94,516 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMORAINE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $32,260 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCrisis Center for South Suburbia: $30,538 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOrland Township Food Pantry FDN: $16,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetPediatric Oncology Treasure Chest: $13,402 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetJENNIFER S FALLICK CANCER SUPPORT CENTER: $12,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC: $11,982 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMCCORD HOUSE NFP: $7,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC6.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kiwanis Club of Orland Park Kiwanis International Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kiwanis Club of Orland Park Kiwanis International Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kiwanis Club of Orland Park Kiwanis International’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home